Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment.

Bee health Biodiversity loss Ecosystem services Hymenoptera Plant-insect interactions Pollination Response traits

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 19 06 2024
revised: 19 09 2024
accepted: 26 09 2024
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 2 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Access to adequate pollen sources in agricultural landscapes is critical for the nutrition and development of bees. The type and quantity of pollen available to bees and may be determined by local plant diversity, land-use intensity and landscape structure but different bee species likely respond differently to these parameters. Identifying community and specific responses is therefore imperative to understand pollinator population dynamics in agricultural landscapes. We sampled bees in 36 plots along a land-use gradient at 4 sites in Belgium and Germany over two years. We collected 1821 bees from 100 bee species and constructed a pollen foraging network with 36 common wild bee species based on pollen metabarcoding. We investigated differences in community responses and species-specific responses to environmental variables. Landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee species richness, diversity and functional richness, and significantly explained bee community composition per plot. Bee collected pollen diversity correlated with bee species diversity. Furthermore, landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee collected pollen diversity when pooling abundant bee species, while it did not correlate with pollen diversity of the most abundant generalists. Land-use intensity and local plant diversity had no significant effect on bee diversity. Larger bees showed negative responses to increasing land-use intensity and bees with more specialized diets showed positive correlations with landscape heterogeneity. Our study goes beyond mere floral diversity and provides new insight into the responses of wild bee communities to landscape structure and regional pollen availability, as well as the interplay between bee abundance and pollen foraging traits. Our results highlight the importance of determining species-specific nutritional needs and considering landscape level structure in pollinator conservation programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39357756
pii: S0048-9697(24)06751-2
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176595
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

176595

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

M A Parreno (MA)

Plant-Insect Interactions, TUM School of Life Science Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany. Electronic address: alejandra.parreno@tum.de.

S Werle (S)

Plant-Insect Interactions, TUM School of Life Science Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany.

L Buydens (L)

Agricultural entomology, acarology, nematology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

C Leroy (C)

INRAE, Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France.

S Roberts (S)

Bees, Wasps and Ants Recording Society, 1 Waterloo Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP1 2JR, UK.

S Koirala (S)

Plant-Insect Interactions, TUM School of Life Science Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany.

M Filipiak (M)

Life History Evolution Lab, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.

M Kuhlmann (M)

Zoological Museum of Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.

J-L Brunet (JL)

INRAE, Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France.

M Henry (M)

INRAE, Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France.

C Alaux (C)

INRAE, Abeilles et Environnement, Avignon, France.

F Requier (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement, et Écologie, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

N Piot (N)

Agricultural entomology, acarology, nematology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

I Meeus (I)

Agricultural entomology, acarology, nematology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

A-M Klein (AM)

Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

A Keller (A)

Cellular and Organismic Networks, Faculty of Biology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

S D Leonhardt (SD)

Plant-Insect Interactions, TUM School of Life Science Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany.

Classifications MeSH