Generalisation of the yield stress measurement in three point bending collapse tests: application to 3D printed flax fibre reinforced hydrogels.

Analytical model Extrusion pressure Flax fibre Hydrogel Three points bending collapse test Yield stress

Journal

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)
ISSN: 1748-605X
Titre abrégé: Biomed Mater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101285195

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 2 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This paper describes the extrusion pressure's effect on composite hydrogel inks' filaments subjected to collapse tests. The composite considered in this work consists of an alginate-poloxamer hydrogel reinforced with flax fibres. Increased extrusion pressure resulted in more asymmetrical filaments between the support pillars. Furthermore, the material and printing conditions used in the present study led to the production of curved specimens. These two characteristics implicitly limit the validity of the yield stress equations commonly used in open literature. Therefore, a new system of equations was derived for the case of asymmetrical and curved filaments. A post-processing method was also created to obtain the properties required to evaluate this yield stress. This new equation was then implemented to identify the strength of failed hydrogels without flax fibre reinforcement. A statistical analysis showed this new equation's significance, which yielded statistically higher (i.e., 1.15 times larger) strength values compared to the numbers obtained with the open literature equations. At larger extrusion pressures, longer periods were needed for the material to converge towards its final shape. Larger extrusion pressure values led to lower yield stresses within the composite hydrogel filament: a 5 kPa increase in extrusion pressure lowered the yield stress by 19 %. In comparison, a 15 kPa increase led to a 29 % decrease in the yield stress. Overall this study provides guidelines to standardize collapse tests and analysis comparison between different materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39357798
doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad82c6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Creative Commons Attribution license.

Auteurs

Charles de Kergariou (C)

Bristol Composite Institute, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Hind Saidani-Scott (H)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, BRISTOL, BS8 1TR, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Adam Perriman (A)

School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Room C52a, Medical Sciences Building, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Graham J Day (GJ)

Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, James Watt School of Engineering, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

James P K Armstrong (JPK)

Department of Translational Health Sciences,, University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, BS1 3NY, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Fabrizio Scarpa (F)

Bristol Composite Institute, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

Classifications MeSH