Differences in Mu rhythm when seeing grasping/motor actions in a real context versus on screens.
Motor actions
Neurocinematics
Reality vs. screen
Visual perception
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
10
07
2024
accepted:
26
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mu rhythm (∼8-12 Hz) in the somatosensory cortex has traditionally been linked with doing and seeing motor activities. Here, we aimed to learn how the medium (physical or screened) in which motor actions are seen could impact on that specific brain rhythm. To do so, we presented to 40 participants the very same narrative content both in a one-shot movie with no cuts and in a real theatrical performance. We recorded subjects' brain activities with electroencephalographic (EEG) procedures, and analyzed Mu rhythm present in left (C3) and right (C4) somatosensory areas in relation to the 24 motor activities included in each visual stimulus (screen vs. reality) (24 motor and grasping actions x 40 participants x 2 conditions = 1920 trials). We found lower Mu spectral power in the somatosensory area after the onset of the motor actions in real performance than on-screened content, more pronounced in the left hemisphere. In our results, the sensorimotor Mu-ERD (event-related desynchronization) was stronger during the real-world observation compared to screen observation. This could be relevant in research areas where the somatosensory cortex is important, such as online learning, virtual reality, or brain-computer interfaces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39358411
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74453-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-74453-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22921Subventions
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PID2021-122446NB-100
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PID2021-122446NB-100
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PID2021-122446NB-100
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PID2021-122446NB-100
Organisme : Junta de Andalucía
ID : BIO-122
Organisme : Junta de Andalucía
ID : BIO-122
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. & Johnson, B. W. McNair, N. a. Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cogn. Brain Res.19, 195–201 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001
Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R. & Mattingley, J. B. Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev.36, 341–349 (2012).
pubmed: 21782846
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004
Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R. & Eickhoff, S. B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage. 50, 1148–1167 (2010).
pubmed: 20056149
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112
Castiello, U. The neuroscience of grasping. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.6, 726–736 (2005).
pubmed: 16100518
doi: 10.1038/nrn1744
Nakayashiki, K., Saeki, M., Takata, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Kondo, T. Modulation of event-related desynchronization during kinematic and kinetic hand movements. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 1–9 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-90
Debnath, R., Salo, V. C., Buzzell, G. A., Yoo, K. H. & Fox, N. A. Mu rhythm desynchronization is specific to action execution and observation: evidence from time-frequency and connectivity analysis. Neuroimage. 184, 496–507 (2019).
pubmed: 30248457
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053
Matsumoto, J. et al. Modulation of mu rhythm desynchronization during motor imagery by transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7, 27 (2010).
pubmed: 20540721
pmcid: 2898754
doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-27
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res.91, 176–180 (1992).
pubmed: 1301372
doi: 10.1007/BF00230027
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. & Rizzolatti, G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 119 (Pt 2), 593–609 (1996).
pubmed: 8800951
doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.593
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. & Johnson, B. W. Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiology. 41, 152–156 (2004).
pubmed: 14693010
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00129.x
Rayson, H., Bonaiuto, J. J., Ferrari, P. F. & Murray, L. Mu desynchronization during observation and execution of facial expressions in 30-month-old children. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.19, 279–287 (2016).
pubmed: 27261926
pmcid: 4913557
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.05.003
Cooper, N. R., Simpson, A., Till, A., Simmons, K. & Puzzo, I. Beta event-related desynchronization as an index of individual differences in processing human facial expression: further investigations of autistic traits in typically developing adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci.7, 1–8 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00159
Cannon, E. N. et al. Action Experience, more than Observation, influences Mu Rhythm Desynchronization. PLoS One. 9, e92002 (2014).
pubmed: 24663967
pmcid: 3963876
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092002
Behmer, L. P. & Jantzen, K. J. Reading sheet music facilitates sensorimotor mu-desynchronization in musicians. Clin. Neurophysiol.122, 1342–1347 (2011).
pubmed: 21216663
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.035
Perry, A. & Bentin, S. Does focusing on hand-grasping intentions modulate electroencephalogram mu and alpha suppressions? Neuroreport. 21, 1050–1054 (2010).
pubmed: 20838261
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833fcb71
Zaepffel, M., Trachel, R., Kilavik, B. E. & Brochier, T. Modulations of EEG Beta power during planning and execution of grasping movements. PLoS One. 8, e60060 (2013).
pubmed: 23555884
pmcid: 3605373
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060060
Khanna, P. & Carmena, J. M. Neural oscillations: beta band activity across motor networks this review comes from a themed issue on large-scale recording technology. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.32, 60–67 (2015).
pubmed: 25528615
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.010
Chavarriaga, R. et al. Human EEG reveals distinct neural correlates of power and precision grasping types. Neuroimage. 181, 635–644 (2018).
pubmed: 30056196
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.055
Neuper, C., Scherer, R., Reiner, M. & Pfurtscheller, G. Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.25, 668–677 (2005).
pubmed: 16236487
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014
Ying, R., Weisz, J. & Allen, P. K. Grasping with your brain: a brain-computer interface for fast grasp selection. Rob. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51532-8_20 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51532-8_20
Perry, A. & Bentin, S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: a comparison between EEG desynchronization in the mu-range and previous fMRI results. Brain Res.1282, 126–132 (2009).
pubmed: 19500557
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.059
Pfurtscheller, G. & Aranibar, A. Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.46, 138–146 (1979).
pubmed: 86421
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90063-4
Liao, Y., Akalin, Z., Makeig, S. & Deak, G. EEG imaging of toddlers during dyadic turn-taking: Mu-rhythm modulation while producing or observing social actions. Neuroimage. 112, 52–60 (2015).
pubmed: 25731992
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.055
Pfurtscheller, G., Brunner, C., Schlögl & Lopes da Silva, F. H. Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. Neuroimage. 31, 153–159 (2006).
pubmed: 16443377
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.003
Syrov, N., Yakovlev, L., Miroshnikov, A. & Kaplan, A. Beyond passive observation: feedback anticipation and observation activate the mirror system in virtual finger movement control via P300-BCI. Front. Hum. Neurosci.17, 1–13 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1180056
Eaves, D. L., Hodges, N. J., Buckingham, G., Buccino, G. & Vogt, S. Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation. Psychol. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01768-7 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01768-7
pubmed: 36574019
pmcid: 11315722
McGarry, L. M., Russo, F. A., Schalles, M. D. & Pineda, J. A. Audio-visual facilitation of the mu rhythm. Exp. Brain Res.218, 527–538 (2012).
pubmed: 22427133
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3046-3
Andreu-Sánchez, C., Martín-Pascual, M. Á., Gruart, A. & Delgado-García, J. M. Looking at reality versus watching screens: media professionalization effects on the spontaneous eyeblink rate. PLoS One. 12, e0176030 (2017).
pubmed: 28467449
pmcid: 5414933
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176030
Mystakidis, S. & Metaverse Encycl MDPI2, 486–497 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia2010031
Daşdemİr, Y. A brain-computer interface for gamification in the Metaverse. DUJE Dicle Uinversity J. Eng.13, 645–652 (2022).
Maggio, M. G. et al. Virtual reality based Cognitive Rehabilitation in minimally conscious state: a Case Report with EEG findings and systematic literature review. Brain Sci.10, 1–16 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10070414
Lin, C., Ko, L. & Chiou, J. Noninvasive neural prostheses using mobile and wireless EEG. Proc. IEEE 96, (2008).
Babiloni, C. et al. Human cortical electroencephalography (EEG) rhythms during the observation of simple aimless movements: a high-resolution EEG study. Neuroimage. 17, 559–572 (2002).
pubmed: 12377134
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1192
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.27, 169–192 (2004).
pubmed: 15217330
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
Rizzolatti, G. & Cattaneo, L. The mirror-neuron system. Arch. Neurol.66, 557–560 (2009).
pubmed: 19433654
Ikeda, Y., Nishimura, Y. & Higuchi, S. Effects of the differences in mental states on the mirror system activities when observing hand actions. J. Physiol. Anthropol.38, 1–7 (2019).
pubmed: 30606252
pmcid: 6318953
doi: 10.1186/s40101-018-0192-8
Marshall, P. J. & Meltzoff, A. N. Neural mirroring systems: Exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2010.09.001 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.09.001
pubmed: 21528008
Madigan, S., McArthur, B. A., Anhorn, C., Eirich, R. & Christakis, D. A. Associations between screen Use and Child Language skills a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr.174, 665–675 (2020).
pubmed: 32202633
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N. & Bus, A. G. A comparison of children’s reading on Paper Versus screen: a Meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res.91 (4) 483–517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074 (2021).
Thorpe, S. G., Cannon, E. N. & Fox, N. A. Rhythms from infancy through Adulthood. J. Clin. Neurophysiol.127, 254–269 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.004
Cuevas, K., Cannon, E. N., Yoo, K. & Fox, N. A. The infant EEG mu rhythm: methodological considerations and best practices. Dev. Rev.34, 26–43 (2014).
pubmed: 24563573
doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.12.001
Marshall, P. J., Young, T. & Meltzoff, A. N. Neural correlates of action observation and execution in 14-month-old infants: an event-related EEG desynchronization study. Dev. Sci.14, 474–480 (2011).
pubmed: 21477187
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00991.x
Marshall, P. J. & Meltzoff, A. N. Neural mirroring systems: exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.1, 110–123 (2011).
pubmed: 21528008
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.09.001
Bojic, L. Metaverse through the prism of power and addiction: what will happen when the virtual world becomes more attractive than reality? Eur. J. Futur Res.10 (22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00208-4 (2022).
Lopez Diez, J. & Metaverse Year one. Mark Zuckerberg’s video keynote on Meta (October 2021) in the context of previous and prospective studies on metaverses. Pensar La. Public. Rev. Int. Investig Public.15, 299–303 (2021).
Zhang, X., Guo, Y., Gao, B. & Long, J. Alpha frequency intervention by Electrical Stimulation to Improve Performance in Mu-Based BCI. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil Eng.28, 1262–1270 (2020).
pubmed: 32305926
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2987529
Pineda, J. A. The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating ‘seeing’ and ‘hearing’ into ‘doing’. Brain Res. Rev.50, 57–68 (2005).
pubmed: 15925412
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
McFarland, D. J., Miner, L. A., Vaughan, T. M. & Wolpaw, J. R. Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements. Brain Topogr. 12, 177–186 (2000).
pubmed: 10791681
doi: 10.1023/A:1023437823106
LaMarca, K., Gevirtz, R., Lincoln, A. J. & Pineda, J. A. Brain–computer interface training of mu EEG rhythms in intellectually impaired children with autism: a feasibility Case Series. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 48, 229–245 (2023).
pubmed: 36607454
doi: 10.1007/s10484-022-09576-w
Heida, T., Poppe, N. R., de Vos, C. C., van Putten, M. J. A. M. & van Vugt, J. P. P. Event-related mu-rhythm desynchronization during movement observation is impaired in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol.125, 1819–1825 (2014).
pubmed: 24560131
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.016
Cho, H., Ahn, M., Ahn, S., Kwon, M. & Jun, S. C. EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface. Giga Sci.6, 1–8 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix034
Silas, J., Levy, J. P., Nielsen, M. K., Slade, L. & Holmes, A. Sex and individual differences in induced and evoked EEG measures of action observation. Neuropsychologia. 48, 2417–2426 (2010).
pubmed: 20226800
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.004
Souza, R. F. L. et al. Effect of the Menstrual cycle on Electroencephalogram Alpha and Beta bands during Motor Imagery and Action Observation. Front. Hum. Neurosci.16, 1–16 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.878887
Tremblay, C. et al. Action observation and execution: intracranial recordings in a human subject. Neurology. 63, 937–938 (2004).
pubmed: 15365160
doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000137111.16767.C6
Halje, P., Seeck, M., Blanke, O. & Ionta, S. Inferior frontal oscillations reveal visuo-motor matching for actions and speech: evidence from human intracranial recordings. Neuropsychologia. 79, 206–214 (2015).
pubmed: 26282276
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.015
Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M. & Fried, I. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr. Biol.20, 750–756 (2010).
pubmed: 20381353
pmcid: 2904852
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045
Martín-Pascual, M. Á., Andreu-Sánchez, C., Delgado-García, J. M. & Gruart, A. Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content. JoVE - J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/57321 (2018).
doi: 10.3791/57321
pubmed: 29889189
Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods. 134, 9–21 (2004).
pubmed: 15102499
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Maris, E. & Oostenveld, R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods. 164, 177–190 (2007).
pubmed: 17517438
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
Pfurtscheller, G. & Da Lopes, F. H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol.110, 1842–1857 (1999).
pubmed: 10576479
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8