Participation Preferences in Cognitive Treatments Among Youth With Mental Illness: Findings From the Your Mind, Your Choice Survey.
cognition
intervention
priority
survey
youth
Journal
Early intervention in psychiatry
ISSN: 1751-7893
Titre abrégé: Early Interv Psychiatry
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101320027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
23
07
2024
received:
22
02
2024
accepted:
10
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To explore the cognitive treatment preferences of young people with mental illness. Two-hundred and fourteen people, aged 12-25 years, were surveyed about their treatment priorities. Participants were specifically asked how they might like to receive cognitive treatments and identify factors that might influence their decisions to participate. Over half of the participants indicated that they would like to receive treatment face-to-face, in a one-on-one setting, with a treatment focus on both deficits and strengths, or without involvement from friends or family when asked about each preference individually. However, only 11% of people wanted all four of these preferences combined. Treatment cost, effectiveness, therapeutic relationships, and accessibility were the most frequently identified factors that could influence perceived decisions to participate. The cognitive treatment preferences of young people are variable. Supports focusing on both cognitive strengths and deficits were a novel finding and warrants further attention within existing treatment frameworks.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Dame Kate Campbell Fellowship, University of Melbourne
ID : 1141207
Informations de copyright
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Allott, K., K. van‐der ‐El, S. Bryce, et al. 2020. “Compensatory Interventions for Cognitive Impairments in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 46: 869–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz134.
Ben‐David, S., A. Cole, G. Brucato, R. Girgis, and M. Munson. 2019. “A Conceptual Model of Mental Health Service Utilisation Among Young Adults at Clinical High‐Risk for Developing Psychosis.” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 42, no. 1: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12725.
Bryce, S., N. Cheng, A. Dalton, et al. 2023. “Cognitive Health Treatment Priorities and Preferences Among Young People With Mental Illness: The Your Mind, Your Choice Survey.” Early Intervention in Psychiatry 18: 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13436.
Bryce, S., A. De Winter, L. Phillips, N. Cheng, M. Alvarez‐Jimenez, and K. Allott. 2023. “Cognitive Strengths in First‐Episode Psychosis: Perspectives From Young People With Lived Experience.” Psychosis 15, no. 3: 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2022.2044895.
Daglas‐Georgiou, R., S. Bryce, G. Smith, et al. 2022. “Treatments for Objective and Subjective Cognitive Functioning in Young People With Depression: Systematic Review of Current Evidence.” Early Intervention in Psychiatry 16, no. 10: 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13248.
Early Psychosis Guidelines Writing Group. 2016. Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Orygen Youth Health.
Frawley, E., C. Heary, C. Berry, et al. 2024. “Participant Perspectives on Cognitive Remediation and Social Recovery in Early Psychosis (CReSt‐R): An Acceptability Study.” Early Intervention in Psychiatry 18, no. 1: 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13424.
Lee, R. S., D. F. Hermens, S. L. Naismith, et al. 2015. “Neuropsychological and Functional Outcomes in Recent‐Onset Major Depression, Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia‐Spectrum Disorders: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.” Translational Psychiatry 5: e555. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.50.
Lewandowski, K. E. 2021. “Feasibility and Tolerability of a Cognitive Remediation Clinical Service in First Episode Coordinated Specialty Care.” Early Intervention in Psychiatry 15, no. 2: 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12978.
Morey‐Nase, C., L. J. Phillips, S. Bryce, et al. 2019. “Subjective Experiences of Neurocognitive Functioning in Young People With Major Depression.” BMC Psychiatry 19, no. 1: 209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888‐019‐2197‐1.
Munson, M., J. Jaccard, K. Moore, et al. 2022. “Impact of a Brief Intervention to Improve Engagement in a Recovery Program for Young Adults With Serious Mental Illness.” Schizophrenia Research 250: 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.11.008.
Munson, M., J. Jaccard, S. Smalling, H. Kim, J. Werner, and L. Scott. 2012. “Static, Dynamic, Intergrated and Contextualised: A Framework for Understanding Mental Health Service Utilization Among Young Adults.” Social Science & Medicine 75, no. 8: 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.039.
Stainton, A., K. Chisholm, S. L. Griffiths, et al. 2023. “Prevalence of Cognitive Impairments and Strengths in the Early Course of Psychosis and Depression.” Psychological Medicine 1‐13: 5945–5957. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723001770.
Vita, A., S. Barlati, A. Ceraso, et al. 2021. “Effectiveness, Core Elements, and Moderators of Response of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.” JAMA Psychiatry 78, no. 8: 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0620.
Wykes, T., D. Stringer, J. Boadu, et al. 2023. “Cognitive Remediation Works but How Should We Provide It? An Adaptive Randomized Controlled Trial of Delivery Methods Using a Patient Nominated Recovery Outcome in First‐Episode Participants.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 49, no. 3: 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214.
Zbukvic, I., S. Bryce, J. Moullin, and K. Allott. 2023. “The Use of Implementation Science to Close the Research‐to‐Treatment Gap for Cognitive Impairment in Psychosis.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 57, no. 10: 1308–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674231160987.