Verification of five-factor models and reference scores for personality dysfunction and trait domains of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11), revised version.
Journal
Personality and mental health
ISSN: 1932-863X
Titre abrégé: Personal Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101473502
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
06
09
2024
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
09
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
3
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
A brief self-reported measure of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for the 11th edition of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Disease (ICD-11) (PAQ-11) was developed to evaluate ICD-11 personality traits. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of the revised PAQ-11 version (PAQ-11R) with an additional item in the Dissociality domain and thresholds for the severity of personality dysfunction and domains. Study 1 examined the construct validity of the PAQ-11R in 192 university students in Korea. Study 2 estimated tentative reference scores of personality dysfunction and domains of the PAQ-11R in 91 patients in Korea. In study 1, the PAQ-11R had a five-factor structure and the revised Dissociality scale had better convergent and discriminant validities than the previous version. In study 2, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the PAQ-11R identified a threshold score of 35. Reference scores for domains were estimated as 15 for Negative Affectivity, 10 for Detachment, 8 for Anankastia, and 5 each for Disinhibition and Dissociality. These scores contribute to severity of personality disturbance but remain qualifiers only; they are not diagnostic. The results suggest that the PAQ-11R is useful as a quick assessment tool for identifying the domains of personality dysfunction in clinical practice in harmony with the ICD-11 guidelines.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (The Ministry of Science and ICT, MSIT)
ID : 2021R1A2C2009668
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors Personality and Mental Health Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Bach, B., Brown, T. A., Mulder, R. T., Newton‐Howes, G., Simonsen, E., & Sellbom, M. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of the ICD‐11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS‐ICD‐11. Personality and Mental Health, 15, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1510
Bach, B., Sellbom, M., Kongerslev, M., Simonsen, E., Krueger, R. F., & Mulder, R. (2017). Deriving ICD‐11 personality disorder domains from dsm‐5 traits: Initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12748
Bach, B., Simonsen, E., Kongerslev, M. T., Bo, S., Hastrup, L. H., Simonsen, S., & Sellbom, M. (2023). ICD‐11 personality disorder features in the Danish general population: Cut‐offs and prevalence rates for severity levels. Psychiatry Research, 328, 115484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115484
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI‐R professional manual. In Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI‐R) and NEO five‐factor inventory (NEO‐FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Crego, C., Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). Obtaining and losing the bipolarity of the five‐factor model through factor analysis. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000378
Germans, S., Van Heck, G. L., Moran, P., & Hodiamont, P. P. G. (2008). The self‐report standardized assessment of personality‐abbreviated scale: Preliminary results of a brief screening test for personality disorders. Personality and Mental Health, 2, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.34
Hong, T. H., Hwang, S. T., & Kim, Y. R. (2018). Replication of a validation study on the Korean version of the personality inventory for DSM‐5 (K‐PID‐5). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 558–572. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.4.008
Hong, T. H., Kim, Y. R., & Hwang, S. T. (2018). Construction and validation of the Korean version of the personality inventory for DSM‐5 short form (K‐PID‐5‐SF). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 396–410. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.3.010
IBM Corporation. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 27.0. IBM Corp.
Kerber, A., Schultze, M., Müller, S., Rühling, R. M., Wright, A. G. C., Spitzer, C., Krueger, R. F., Knaevelsrud, C., & Zimmermann, J. (2022). Development of a short and ICD‐11 compatible measure for DSM‐5 maladaptive personality traits using ant colony optimization algorithms. Assessment, 29, 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120971848
Kim, J. T., & Shin, D. K. (1978). A study based on the standardization of the STAI for Korea. The New Medical Journal, 21, 69–75.
Kim, Y. R., Tyrer, P., & Hwang, S. T. (2021). Personality assessment questionnaire for ICD‐11 personality trait domains: Development and testing. Personality and Mental Health, 15, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1493
Kim, Y. R., Tyrer, P., Lee, H. S., Kim, S. G., Hwang, S. T., Lee, G. Y., & Mulder, R. (2015). Preliminary field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD‐11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 2. Proposed trait domains. Personality and Mental Health, 9, 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1305
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM‐5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
Langbehn, D. R., Pfohl, B. M., Reynolds, S., Clark, L. A., Battaglia, M., Bellodi, L., Cadoret, R., Grove, W., Pilkonis, P., & Links, P. (1999). The Iowa personality disorder screen: Development and preliminary validation of a brief screening interview. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1999.13.1.75
Lee, Y. H., & Song, J. Y. (1991). A study of the reliability and the validity of the BDI, SDS, and MMPI‐D scales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10, 98–113.
Lotfi, M., Bach, B., Amini, M., & Simonsen, E. (2018). Structure of DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 personality domains in Iranian community sample. Personality and Mental Health, 12, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1409
Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., Williamson, R. L., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM‐5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the personality inventory for DSM‐5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
Min, B. M., Lee, K. I., & Jeong, J. C. (1997). NEO‐PI‐R. PSI Consulting.
Moran, P., Leese, M., Lee, T., Walters, P., Thornicroft, G., & Mann, A. (2003). Standardised assessment of personality – abbreviated scale (SAPAS): Preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.228
Mulder, R. T., Horwood, J., Tyrer, P., Carter, J., & Joyce, P. R. (2016). Validating the proposed ICD‐11 domains. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1336
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). A self‐report measure for the ICD‐11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD‐11. Psychological Assessment, 30, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). The five‐factor personality inventory for ICD‐11: A facet‐level assessment of the ICD‐11 trait model. Psychological Assessment, 32, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000763
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sellbom, M., Brown, T. A., & Bach, B. (2024). Development and psychometric evaluation of the personality disorder severity ICD‐11 (PDS‐ICD‐11) clinician‐rating form. Personality and Mental Health, 18, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1596
Sellbom, M., Chiasson, P. M., Brown, T. A., & Bach, B. (2023). Examining the construct validity of the personality assessment questionnaire for ICD‐11 (PAQ‐11) personality trait domains in a community sample. Personality and Mental Health, 17, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1573
Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P., & Facobs, G. (1983). Manual for the state‐trait anxiety inventory, STAI (form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Tyrer, P., & Alexander, J. (1979). Classification of personality disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.135.2.163
Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., Mulder, R., & Group IRW. (2011). Reclassifying personality disorders [editorial material]. Lancet, 377, 1814–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61926-5
World Health Organization. (2022). International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (11th Revision). Accessed June 13, 2024. https://icd.who.int/
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD‐11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Health Organization.