Education Research: Neuroradiology Curriculum and Competencies Among Canadian Adult Neurology Residency Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study.


Journal

Neurology. Education
ISSN: 2771-9979
Titre abrégé: Neurol Educ
ID NLM: 9918787188106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 13 03 2023
accepted: 18 09 2023
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 3 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While benefitting from neuroradiologists' reports, neurologists use their own image interpretation to guide clinical decisions, especially in acute care settings. This calls for robust neuroradiology training in neurology residency, informed by current educational gaps and practices. This study aims to (1) characterize the formal neuroradiology curriculum among Canadian neurology residency programs; (2) assess neurology residents' neuroimaging interpretation competencies; and (3) define neurology residents' and program directors' (PDs) attitudes toward the current curriculum and future directions. Anonymous surveys were sent to Canadian neurology residents and PDs, querying neuroradiology learning activities, imaging modalities covered, assessment modalities, perceived residents' competencies to interpret different modalities, and attitudes regarding neuroradiology training. Residents were asked to interpret 15 neuroimaging cases. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed. Potential differences in residents' interpretation success rates by seniority, self-perceived proficiency, and perception of curriculum sufficiency were examined using 2-tailed Welch tests with a 95% CI and Holm-Bonferroni comparison adjustment. Statistics were computed using Excel. Seventy-eight (32.6%) residents and 11 (68.8%) PDs participated. Ten of 11 PDs reported including a mandatory neuroradiology rotation, and 9/11 offered a formal neuroradiology curriculum covering head CT, head and neck CT angiography (CTA), spine MRI, and head MRI. Programs predominantly offered additional didactic lectures (9/11), teaching cases (8/11), and imaging websites (8/11). Most of the residents agreed with a minimum 1-month long rotation and desired regular didactics from neuroradiologists. Residents favored learning about head MRI (88.5%), head and neck CTA (76.9%), and spine MRI (69.2%). Senior residents' self-perceived competencies were highest for head CT, head MRI, and head and neck CTA, but lower than PDs' perception. Senior residents had greater interpretation scores than juniors (84.5% ± 13.2% vs 69.1% ± 19.9%; Neuroradiology training varies among programs. Residents expressed strong interest in commonly taught modalities, for which they also expressed high self-perceived competencies. However, PDs expressed greater satisfaction than residents with the current training. Leveraging interactions with neuroradiologists and online case-based learning while emphasizing trainees' interests can enhance postgraduate neuroradiology training for this useful skill.

Sections du résumé

Background and Objectives UNASSIGNED
While benefitting from neuroradiologists' reports, neurologists use their own image interpretation to guide clinical decisions, especially in acute care settings. This calls for robust neuroradiology training in neurology residency, informed by current educational gaps and practices. This study aims to (1) characterize the formal neuroradiology curriculum among Canadian neurology residency programs; (2) assess neurology residents' neuroimaging interpretation competencies; and (3) define neurology residents' and program directors' (PDs) attitudes toward the current curriculum and future directions.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Anonymous surveys were sent to Canadian neurology residents and PDs, querying neuroradiology learning activities, imaging modalities covered, assessment modalities, perceived residents' competencies to interpret different modalities, and attitudes regarding neuroradiology training. Residents were asked to interpret 15 neuroimaging cases. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed. Potential differences in residents' interpretation success rates by seniority, self-perceived proficiency, and perception of curriculum sufficiency were examined using 2-tailed Welch tests with a 95% CI and Holm-Bonferroni comparison adjustment. Statistics were computed using Excel.
Results UNASSIGNED
Seventy-eight (32.6%) residents and 11 (68.8%) PDs participated. Ten of 11 PDs reported including a mandatory neuroradiology rotation, and 9/11 offered a formal neuroradiology curriculum covering head CT, head and neck CT angiography (CTA), spine MRI, and head MRI. Programs predominantly offered additional didactic lectures (9/11), teaching cases (8/11), and imaging websites (8/11). Most of the residents agreed with a minimum 1-month long rotation and desired regular didactics from neuroradiologists. Residents favored learning about head MRI (88.5%), head and neck CTA (76.9%), and spine MRI (69.2%). Senior residents' self-perceived competencies were highest for head CT, head MRI, and head and neck CTA, but lower than PDs' perception. Senior residents had greater interpretation scores than juniors (84.5% ± 13.2% vs 69.1% ± 19.9%;
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Neuroradiology training varies among programs. Residents expressed strong interest in commonly taught modalities, for which they also expressed high self-perceived competencies. However, PDs expressed greater satisfaction than residents with the current training. Leveraging interactions with neuroradiologists and online case-based learning while emphasizing trainees' interests can enhance postgraduate neuroradiology training for this useful skill.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39359313
doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200096
pii: NXE-2023-000109
pmc: PMC11419301
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e200096

Informations de copyright

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NE for full disclosures.

Auteurs

Diana Benea (D)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Rose Di Ioia (R)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Julien Bejjani (J)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen (AX)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Isabelle Hardy (I)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Isabelle Trop (I)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Nicolas Jodoin (N)

From the School of Medicine (D.B., R.D.I., A.X.-L.N.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (J.B., I.T.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Ophthalmology (I.H.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal; and Department of Neurosciences (N.J.), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Classifications MeSH