Bounded risk disposition explains Turing patterns and tipping points during spatial contagions.
epidemics
opinion polarization
pattern formation
social myths
socio-economic turbulence
susceptibility acquisition
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
23
03
2024
revised:
24
06
2024
accepted:
04
08
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
3
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spatial contagions, such as pandemics, opinion polarization, infodemics and civil unrest, exhibit non-trivial spatio-temporal patterns and dynamics driven by complex human behaviours and population mobility. Here, we propose a concise generic framework to model different contagion types within a suitably defined contagion vulnerability space. This space comprises risk disposition, considered in terms of bounded risk aversion and adaptive responsiveness and a generalized susceptibility acquisition. We show that resultant geospatial contagion configurations follow intricate Turing patterns observed in reaction-diffusion systems. Pattern formation is shown to be highly sensitive to changes in underlying vulnerability parameters. The identified critical regimes (tipping points) imply that slight changes in susceptibility acquisition and perceived local risks can significantly alter the population flow and resultant contagion patterns. We examine several case studies using Australian datasets (COVID-19 pandemic; crime incidence; conflict exposure during COVID-19 protests; real estate businesses and residential building approvals) and demonstrate that these spatial contagions generated Turing patterns in accordance with the proposed model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39359464
doi: 10.1098/rsos.240457
pii: rsos240457
pmc: PMC11444781
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7441741']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
240457Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We declare we have no competing interests.