Outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for kidney stones: a prospective cohort study.

bleeding complications kidney stones minimally invasive surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Journal

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 11 06 2024
accepted: 14 08 2024
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 3 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Currently, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard of treatment for large renal stones. The high prevalence of urolithiasis is associated with a high recurrence rate increasing the risk of re-intervention. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications of PCNL among patients with previous therapeutic interventions for renal stones. Between August 2018 and September 2023, 245 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study and who underwent PCNL for renal stones at our institution. We compared patients who had no previous renal surgery (group 1: The fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the group of patients with previous open surgery than in groups 1 and 3 (161.47±52.44, 223.05±33.29, 172.27±30.51 sec, PCNL in patients with a history of renal surgery was associated with longer fluoroscopy and operative time. However, the success and morbidity rates as a secondary procedure were similar to those of PCNL in patients with no previous intervention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39359763
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002502
pii: AMSU-D-24-01175
pmc: PMC11444619
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

5711-5715

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Aymen Sakly (A)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Syrine Khaldi (S)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Anouar Touati (A)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Elyes Dimassi (E)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Walid Zakhama (W)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Yassine Binous (Y)

Department of Urology, Tahar Sfar University Hospital of Mahdia, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Classifications MeSH