Safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms during single antiplatelet therapy: A multicenter study.
Aneurysm
angiography
device
flow diverter
intervention
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
3
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This multicenter study evaluates the safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters (cFDs) for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms under single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). This is a retrospective, observational study of 41 patients (median age: 58 years) with 41 aneurysms (median size: 7 mm, 29 [71%] saccular, 9 [22%] ruptured) treated with cFDs at four neurovascular centers between 2020 and 2023. Scheduled cases received continuous SAPT starting seven days before the procedure. Emergency cases were treated with tirofiban followed by SAPT loading. The safety endpoint was ischemic complications occurring during the procedure and within four months of clinical follow-up. The Pipeline Vantage or Flex Shield was used in 26 (63%) procedures, the FRED X in 12 (29%), the p48/64 Hydrophilic Polymer Coating in 2 (5%), and the Derivo Embolization Device 2heal in 1 (2%). Single antiplatelet therapy consisted of prasugrel in 27 (66%) patients, ticagrelor in 9 (22%), and ASA in 5 (12%). There were 2 (5%) early ischemic complications (one minor stroke and one transient ischemic attack). There were no late ischemic complications in the four-month follow-up of 35 patients. The six dropouts included four nontreatment-related deaths after subarachnoid hemorrhage and two patients with a poor outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Complete and favorable occlusion rates (median: 7 months) were 75% (27/36) and 89% (32/36), respectively. Coated flow diverter implantation in the setting of SAPT was safe and effective and warrants confirmation in a prospective comparative trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39360399
doi: 10.1177/15910199241286542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15910199241286542Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). TL serves or previously served as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), CERUS Endovascular (Fremont, CA, USA), Phenox (Bochum, Germany), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). DZ is on the speaker’s bureau of Philips (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and lecturer for Amboss GmbH (Cologne, Germany). FD serves as consultant/ proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), Balt (Irvine, CA, USA), Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson (Irvine, CA, USA); received speakers honoraria from Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson (Irvine, CA, USA), Acandis (Pforzheim, Germany), Asahi (Tokyo, Japan), Q`Apel (Fremont, CA, USA), Penumbra (Alameda, CA, USA), Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA); received scientific grants from Cerenovus/Johnson&Johnson (Irvine, CA, USA). SH received travel support by Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland).