Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel for Recurrent Osteosarcoma with Serial Monitoring Using Liquid Biopsy: A Report from the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
accepted: 01 10 2024
received: 27 04 2024
revised: 02 07 2024
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 3 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is often used to treat patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Nab-paclitaxel has preclinical activity against osteosarcoma and is potentially less myelosuppressive than docetaxel. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional phase II trial combining gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for patients 12-30 years with recurrent osteosarcoma and measurable disease. A Simon's two-stage design was used to test a 4-month progression-free survival (PFS-4) of 10% vs. 35%. Patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly x 3 in 4-week cycles. Immunohistochemical analysis of archival tissue and serial assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using ultralow passage whole-genome sequencing were performed to identify potential biomarkers of response. Eighteen patients received 56 total cycles (median 2, range 1 - 12). Two patients (11%) experienced confirmed partial response, and 6 (33%) received > 2 cycles. The PFS-4 was 28% (95% CI 13-59%). Six patients required dose reductions and three patients were removed due to toxicities. All 18 patients had detectable CTCs, and 10 had ctDNA identified. All 8 patients with MYC amplification at study-entry experienced disease progression. Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated similar clinical activity and toxicity compared to previous retrospective reports utilizing gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Serial analysis of CTC and ctDNA was feasible in this prospective multi-institution study and provides preliminary data on the use of these assays in patients with relapsed disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is often used to treat patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Nab-paclitaxel has preclinical activity against osteosarcoma and is potentially less myelosuppressive than docetaxel. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional phase II trial combining gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for patients 12-30 years with recurrent osteosarcoma and measurable disease.
METHODS METHODS
A Simon's two-stage design was used to test a 4-month progression-free survival (PFS-4) of 10% vs. 35%. Patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly x 3 in 4-week cycles. Immunohistochemical analysis of archival tissue and serial assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using ultralow passage whole-genome sequencing were performed to identify potential biomarkers of response.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eighteen patients received 56 total cycles (median 2, range 1 - 12). Two patients (11%) experienced confirmed partial response, and 6 (33%) received > 2 cycles. The PFS-4 was 28% (95% CI 13-59%). Six patients required dose reductions and three patients were removed due to toxicities. All 18 patients had detectable CTCs, and 10 had ctDNA identified. All 8 patients with MYC amplification at study-entry experienced disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrated similar clinical activity and toxicity compared to previous retrospective reports utilizing gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Serial analysis of CTC and ctDNA was feasible in this prospective multi-institution study and provides preliminary data on the use of these assays in patients with relapsed disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39360936
pii: 748820
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1339
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Aditi Dhir (A)

University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, United States.

Masanori Hayashi (M)

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Avery Bodlak (A)

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.

Javier Oesterheld (J)

Levine Children's Hospital, charlotte, United States.

David M Loeb (DM)

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.

Leo Mascarenhas (L)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Michael S Isakoff (MS)

Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, United States.

Eric S Sandler (ES)

Nemours Children's Health- Jacksonville, Florida, United States.

Scott C Borinstein (SC)

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Matteo Trucco (M)

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Joanne P Lagmay (JP)

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Bhuvana A Setty (BA)

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.

Christine A Pratilas (CA)

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Emi Caywood (E)

Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, Delaware, United States.

Jonathan Metts (J)

Moffitt Cancer Center, Florida, United States.

Hong Yin (H)

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, United States.

Brooke Fridley (B)

Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, United States.

Jun Yin (J)

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.

Jose Laborde (J)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.

Damon R Reed (DR)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.

Daniel L Adams (DL)

Creatv MicroTech (United States), Monmouth Junction, NJ, United States.

Lars M Wagner (LM)

Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Classifications MeSH