Convertible glenoid replacement in the anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: medium-term results.
Convertible metal-backed glenoid
Glenoid
Metal-backed glenoid
Radiological survival
Revision surgery
Shoulder arthroplasty
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
10
02
2024
accepted:
02
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
3
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The older generation of high thickness metal-backed glenoid prostheses had a high failure rate. The goal of our study was to analyze the medium-term clinical and radiological results of a technically modified generation of metal backed glenoids with 35% decrease in thickness. Thirty-nine patients (43 shoulders) with a mean age of 66.5 years at surgery were examined from two to ten years (mean 71.2 months) using the Constant-Score, Subjective Shoulder Value and X-ray in a.p. and axial view. Indication for surgery included patients with glenoid types B1, B2, or B3 and/or posterior subluxation but intact rotator cuff, or patients who did not want a reverse prosthesis and had high functional demands. Inclusion criteria comprised participation in a clinical and radiological follow-up examination, along with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. Additionally, in all cases, the Constant Score and the Subjective Shoulder Value (PROM) had to be determined. Exclusion criteria were an incomplete dataset, implantation of a different prosthesis type, and failure to meet the minimum follow-up time. The absolute Constant Score (CS) improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from 43 ± 13 (range: 20-69) points before to 80 ± 13 (range: 46-98) points after surgery. The only preoperative negative influencing factor on the result was the glenoid protrusion according to Lévigne (p = 0.0150). No significant differences in functional outcomes were found between glenoid types A2, B1, B2 and B3. Radiolucent lines at the interface were observed in a total of four patients (13%). Radiological signs of glenoid osteolysis were seen in six patients (20%). Humeral upward migration was observed in four patients (13%) and posterior shoulder joint decentering occurred in one patient (3%). Implant-specific complications occurred in three cases (7%). Due to a massive rotator cuff tear, two cases (4.7%) had to be converted to a reversed implant, with the primary metal component remaining in place. If the implant-specific and rotator cuff-associated complications are summarized, the rate is 11.7%. All components that required conversion to an reverse implant have so far remained free of complications. Favorable clinical results can be achieved, especially in patients with an eccentric glenoid type. Severe preoperative glenoid erosion (Walch A2, B2, B3) does not appear to have any influence on postoperative functional results. The complication and revision rates are significantly better than in previous studies with conventional metal-backed glenoid components. Conversion of the anatomical glenoid component to a reverse system was always possible and good clinical results were achieved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39361059
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05536-7
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05536-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Fox TJ, Cil A, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2009) Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg Nov-Dec 18(6):859–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.020
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.020
Papadonikolakis A, Matsen FA (2014) Metal-backed glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 96:1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00674
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00674
pubmed: 24951741
Clitherow HD, Frampton CM, Astley TM (2014) Effect of glenoid cementation on total shoulder arthroplasty degenerative arthritis of the shoulder: a review of the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(6):775–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.022
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.022
Young A, Walch G, Boileau P, Favard L, Gohlke F, Loew M, Molé D (2011) A multicentre study of the long-term results of using a flat-back polyethylene glenoid component in shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93–B:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25086
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25086
Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G (2013) Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:894–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.016
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.016
Page RS, Pai V, Eng K, Bain G, Graves S, Lorimer M (2018) Cementless versus cemented glenoid components in conventional total shoulder joint arthroplasty: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27:1859–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.017
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.017
Walch G, Young AA, Melis B, Gazielly D, Loew M, Boileau P (2011) Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011
Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2010) Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.018
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.018
Hinse S, Pastor T, Hasler A, Ernstbrunner L, Wieser K, Gerber C (2023) Mid- to long-term clinical and radiological results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with B2 glenoids. JSES Int 7:464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.006
pubmed: 37266161
pmcid: 10229408
Montoya F, Magosch P et al (2013) Midterm results of a total shoulder prosthesis fixed with a cementless glenoid component. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(5):628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.005
Merolla G, Chin P, Sasyniuk TM et al (2016) Total shoulder arthroplasty with a second generation tantalum trabecular metal metal-backed glenoid component: clinical and radiographic outcomes with a mean follow-up of 38 months. Bone Joint J Jan 98–B(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36620
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36620
Katz D, Kany J, Valenti P, Sauzières P, Gleyze P, El Kholti K (2013) New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Sept 23:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1109-6
doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1109-6
Magosch P, Habermeyer P, Vetter P (2023) Radiologic midterm results of cemented and uncemented glenoid components in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a matched pair analysis. Archives Orthop Trauma Surg Jan 143(1):225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04021-9
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04021-9
Boileau P, Moineau G et al (2015) Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(10):1534–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.012
Vuillermin CB, Trump ME, Barwood SA, Hoy GA (2015) Catastrophic failure of a low profile metal-backed glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Shoulder Surg Oct -Dec 9(4):121–127. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.167952
doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.167952
Noschajew E, Rittenschober F, Kindermann H, Ortmaier R (2022) Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after anatomical total shoulder replacement using a modular metal-backed glenoid after a Mean Follow-Up of 5.7 years. J Clin Med 11:6107: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206107
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206107
Budge MD, Nolan EM, Heisey MH, Baker K, Wiater MJ (2013) Results of a total shoulder arthroplasty with a monoblock porus tantalum glenoid component: a prospective minimum 2-year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.001
Taunton MJ, McIntosh AL, Sperling JW, Coflied RH (2008) Total shoulder arthroplasty with a Metal-Backed, Bone-Ingrowth Glenoid Component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2180–2188. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00966
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00966
pubmed: 18829916
Raiss P, Schmitt M, Bruckner T et al (2012) Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e1711–e1710. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00580
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00580
pubmed: 23224391
Levy DM, Abrams GD, Harris JD et al (2016) Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 10:78–84. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180720
doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.180720
pubmed: 27186060
pmcid: 4857535
Lowe JT, Testa EJ, Li X et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifcations. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:669–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.024
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.024
Stewart MP, Kelly IG (1997) Total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid disease: 7- to 13-year follow-up of 37 joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6645
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6645
pubmed: 9020448
Young AA, Walch G, Pape G et al (2012) Secondary rotator cuf dysfunction following total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than fve years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:685–693. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00727
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00727
pubmed: 22419408
Durchholz H, Salomonsson B, Moroder P, Lambert S, Page R (2019) Core Set of Radiographic Parameters for Shoulder Arthroplasty Monitoring. JBJS Open Access 2019:e0025. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00025
Raiss P, Schmitt M, Bruckner T, Kasten P, Pape G, Loew M, Zeifang F (2012) Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a Minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg 94(23):e171
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00580
Fox TJ, Foruria AM, Kilka BJ, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2013) Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg September 22(9):1221–1227
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.034
Bonnevialle N, Melis B, Neyton L, Favard L, Molé D, Walch G, Boileau P (2013) Aseptic glenoid loosening or failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: revision with glenoid reimplantation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22:745–751
Castagna A, Randelli M, Garofalo R, Maradei L, Giardella A, Borroni M (2010) Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement. J Bone&Joint Surg (Br) Oct 1092–B. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.23578
Kany J, Amouyel T, Flamand O et al (2015) A convertible shoulder system: is it useful in total shoulder arthroplasty revisions? Int Orthop 39:299–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2563-z
doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2563-z
pubmed: 25319947
Valenti P, Katz D, Kany J, Werthel J-D (2018) Convertible glenoid components facilitate revisions to reverse shoulder arthroplasty easier: retrospective review of 13 cases. Am J Orthop 47(2). https://doi.org/10.12788/ajo.2018.0008
Castagna A, Delcogliano M, de Caro F et al (2013) Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system. Int Orthop 37:1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1907-4
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1907-4
pubmed: 23685831
pmcid: 3685650
Weber-Spickschen TS, Alfke D, Agneskirchner JD (2015) The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results. Bone Joint J 97–B:1662–1667. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35176
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35176
pubmed: 26637682
Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Loew M, Magosch P, Martetschläger F, Tauber M. Schulterchirurgie, 5th edition. Heidelberg: Urban und Fischer; Page 631–720.