High-sugar diet leads to loss of beneficial probiotics in housefly larvae guts.

High-sugar diet Housefly Microbiota Probiotics

Journal

The ISME journal
ISSN: 1751-7370
Titre abrégé: ISME J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 22 05 2024
revised: 15 07 2024
accepted: 01 10 2024
medline: 4 10 2024
pubmed: 4 10 2024
entrez: 3 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The housefly (Musca domestica) is a common insect species with only a few recurrent bacterial taxa in its gut microbiota, because the numerous microbial acquisition routes in its septic habitats can favor transient microbes. Here, we investigated the role of the diet on the microbiota and the developmental success of a housefly strain reared on three substrates. We used a control wheat bran-based substrate, and added clotted cream and sucrose to make a high-fat, and a high-sugar substrate, respectively. The conducted survey revealed that, in contrast to the high-fat diet, the high-sugar diet caused lower developmental success and less diverse microbiota, in which several lactobacilli were replaced with Weissella bacterial phylotypes. Cultures with sucrose as the sole carbon source confirmed that a Weissela confusa strain, isolated from larvae, could utilize sucrose more efficiently than other tested lactic acid bacteria; a result also supported by gene function prediction analysis. Enhancing the rearing substrate with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains, which were isolated from control larvae, could not only revert the negative effect of the high-sucrose diet on development, but also increase the gut bacterial diversity. In our study, we show that the microbiota shifts in response to the high-sucrose diet did not benefit the host, that showed lower developmental success. In contrast, high-sucrose favored specific components of the microbiota, that continued to be enriched even after multiple generations, outcompeting beneficial bacteria. Also, microbiome manipulation showed the potential of probiotics to rescue host performance and restore the microbiome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39361901
pii: 7810223
doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae193
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) [2024]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Microbial Ecology.

Auteurs

Anna Voulgari-Kokota (A)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, 6700 EH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Francesco Boatta (F)

Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Ruud Rijkers (R)

Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bregje Wertheim (B)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Leo W Beukeboom (LW)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Jacintha Ellers (J)

Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, 6700 EH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Joana Falcao Salles (JF)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH