More is Less: Image Enhancement Technology Reduces Radiation Exposure During Anterior Lumber Interbody Fusion.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion fluoroscopy image enhancement radiation exposure spine fusion

Journal

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
ISSN: 1878-1632
Titre abrégé: Spine J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130732

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 23 04 2024
revised: 14 09 2024
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 4 10 2024
pubmed: 4 10 2024
entrez: 3 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Fluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD). Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into two groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD). A total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs 87%), all p<0.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs 48.2), both p<0.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time < 30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and > 60 sec, respectively). The use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND CONTEXT BACKGROUND
Fluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD).
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into two groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD).
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs 87%), all p<0.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs 48.2), both p<0.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time < 30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and > 60 sec, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39362366
pii: S1529-9430(24)01025-8
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms.

Auteurs

Brian Kuhn (B)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Joel Hlavaty (J)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Patrick Muck (P)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Matthew Recht (M)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Aaron Kulwicki (A)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Mark Broering (M)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Adam Reichard (A)

Department of Vascular Surgery, TriHealth. 10506A Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242.

Classifications MeSH