Characterizing smartphone capabilities for seismic and structural monitoring.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
04
06
2024
accepted:
11
09
2024
medline:
4
10
2024
pubmed:
4
10
2024
entrez:
3
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As seismic events continue to pose significant threats to urban infrastructure, leveraging smartphones equipped with accelerometers for real-time monitoring has gained prominence. To ascertain the reliability and sensitivity of smartphone-based measurements, an in-depth characterization of their response is essential. This article presents a thorough characterization of the performance of typical accelerometers installed on three distinct smartphone models. For this, a novel experimental apparatus has been developed to conduct a comparative study involving three different smartphones against a reference accelerometer. We determine each accelerometer's transfer functions for Fourier frequencies 0.1-40 Hz, evidencing main differences and demonstrating a higher sensitivity than expected. Possible implementation in future distributed networks of heterogeneous and synchronized sensors, capable of independently generating and validating timely alerts in particular seismic events, are also discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39362928
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72929-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-72929-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23017Subventions
Organisme : European Commission
ID : NRR - M4C2 - Investimento 1.3, Partenariato Esteso PE00000001 - 'RESTART', fund
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Allen, R. M. & Melgar, D. Earthquake early warning: Advances, scientific challenges, and societal needs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.47, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457 (2019).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457
Hsu, T.-Y. & Nieh, C. P. On-site earthquake early warning using smartphones. Sensors[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy470 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy470
pubmed: 33322566
pmcid: 7763505
Chandrakumar, C., Prasanna, R., Stephens, M. & Tan, M. L. Earthquake early warning systems based on low-cost ground motion sensors: A systematic literature review. Front. Sens. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsens.2022.1020202 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fsens.2022.1020202
Minson, S. E., Meier, M.-A., Baltay, A. S., Hanks, T. C. & Cochran, E. S. The limits of earthquake early warning: Timeliness of ground motion estimates. Sci. Adv.[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0504 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0504
pubmed: 29750190
pmcid: 5943053
Spallarossa, D., Kotha, S. R., Picozzi, M., Barani, S. & Bindi, D. On-site earthquake early warning: A partially non-ergodic perspective from the site effects point of view. Geophys. J. Int.216, 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy470 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy470
Zhao, C. & Zhao, J. X. S-and P-wave spectral ratios for on-site earthquake early warning in Japan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.109, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180116 (2018).
doi: 10.1785/0120180116
Bhanu, P. C. et al. A prototype earthquake early warning system for northern India. J. Earthq. Eng.25, 2455–2473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1625828 (2021).
doi: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1625828
Kodera, Y. Real-time detection of rupture development: Earthquake early warning using p waves from growing ruptures. Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076118 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/2017GL076118
Chen, M., Peng, C. & Cheng, Z. Earthquake event recognition on smartphones based on neural network models. Sensors[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228769 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/s22228769
pubmed: 36617044
pmcid: 9824708
Pnevmatikos, N. G., Kallivokas, L. F. & Gantes, C. J. Feed-forward control of active variable stiffness systems for mitigating seismic hazard in structures. Eng. Struct.26, 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.11.003 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.11.003
Sarmadi, H., Entezami, A., Yuen, K.-V. & Behkamal, B. Review on smartphone sensing technology for structural health monitoring. Measurement223, 113716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113716 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113716
Feldbusch, A., Sadegh-Azar, H. & Agne, P. Vibration analysis using mobile devices (smartphones or tablets). Proc. Eng.199, 2790–2795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.543 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.543
Francisco, V. & Wen, Y. Smartphone based structural health monitoring using deep neural networks. Sensors Actuators A Phys.346, 113820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113820 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2022.113820
Matarazzo, T., Kondor, D. & Milardo, S. E. A. Crowdsourcing bridge dynamic monitoring with smartphone vehicle trips. Commun. Eng.1, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-022-00025-4 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s44172-022-00025-4
pmcid: 10955948
Feng, M., Fukuda, Y., Mizuta, M. & Ozer, E. Citizen sensors for SHM: Use of accelerometer data from smartphones. Sensors15, 2980–2998. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150202980 (2015).
doi: 10.3390/s150202980
pubmed: 25643056
pmcid: 4367344
Ahn, J.-K., Lee, J., Kwon, Y.-W., Kim, J.-K. & Kwak, D. Y. Development of seismic intensity maps using low-cost micro-electro-mechanical systems seismic network. IEEE Access11, 39926–39933. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268520 (2023).
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268520
Kong, Q. et al. Smartphone-based networks for earthquake detection. In 15th International Conference on Innovations for Community Services. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1109/I4CS.2015.7294490 (2015).
Chen, M., Peng, C. & Cheng, Z. Earthquake event recognition on smartphones based on neural network models. Sensors[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228769 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/s22228769
pubmed: 36617044
pmcid: 9824708
Vega, F. & Yu, W. Smartphone based structural health monitoring using deep neural networks. Sensors Actuators A Phys.346, 113820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113820 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2022.113820
Finazzi, F. The earthquake network project: Toward a crowdsourced smartphone-based earthquake early warning system. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.106, 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150354 (2016).
doi: 10.1785/0120150354
Richard, M. A., Qinckai, K. & Robert, M.-S. The myshake platform: A global vision for earthquake early warning. Pure Appl. Geophys.177, 1699–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02337-7 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s00024-019-02337-7
Finazzi, F., Bossu, R. & Cotton, F. Smartphones enabled up to 58 s strong-shaking warning in the m7.8 Türkiye earthquake. Sci. Rep.14, 4878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55279-z (2024).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55279-z
pubmed: 38418495
pmcid: 10902327
Becker, J. et al. Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: A survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun.7, 138. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00613-9 (2020).
doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00613-9
Cremen, G., Galasso, C. & Zuccolo, E. Investigating the potential effectiveness of earthquake early warning across Europe. Nat. Commun.13, 639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27807-2 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27807-2
pubmed: 35136044
pmcid: 8826849
Lăpădat, A. M., Tiberius, C. C. J. M. & Teunissen, P. J. G. Experimental evaluation of smartphone accelerometer and low-cost dual frequency GNSS sensors for deformation monitoring. Sensors[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237946 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/s21237946
pubmed: 34883950
pmcid: 8659869
Kinemetrics, I. EpiSensor Force Balance Accelerometer Model FBA ES-T. https://www.passcal.nmt.edu/webfm_send/2434 (2005).
Luzi, L. et al. Engineering strong motion database (ESM) (version 2.0). Istit. Nazl. Geofis. Vulcanol. (INGV)[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.13127/ESM.2 (2020).
Capponi, A. et al. A survey on mobile crowdsensing systems: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.21, 2419–2465. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2914030 (2019).
doi: 10.1109/COMST.2019.2914030
Liu, J., Shen, H. & Zhang, X. A survey of mobile crowdsensing techniques: A critical component for the internet of things. In 2016 25th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2016.7568484 (2016).
Suhag, D. & Jha, V. A comprehensive survey on mobile crowdsensing systems. J. Syst. Architect.142, 102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2023.102952 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2023.102952
Zhao, S. et al. A survey of sparse mobile crowdsensing: Developments and opportunities. IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc.3, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2022.3177290 (2022).
doi: 10.1109/OJCS.2022.3177290
He, X., Liu, M. & Yang, G. Spatiotemporal opportunistic transmission for mobile crowd sensing networks. Pers Ubiquit. Comput.27, 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01439-7 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s00779-020-01439-7
Wang, J., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, D. & Kong, L. Task allocation in mobile crowd sensing: State-of-the-art and future opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J.5, 3747–3757. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2864341 (2018).
doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2864341
Liao, W., Chen, X., Lu, X., Huang, Y. & Tian, Y. Deep transfer learning and time-frequency characteristics-based identification method for structural seismic response. Front. Built Environ.[SPACE] https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.627058 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.627058