Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention of anomalous coronary arteries: insights from the PROGRESS CTO registry.
anomalous coronary artery
chronic total occlusion
percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Oct 2024
04 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
25
08
2024
received:
04
07
2024
accepted:
20
09
2024
medline:
4
10
2024
pubmed:
4
10
2024
entrez:
4
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There is limited information about the frequency and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in anomalous coronary arteries (ACA). We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of CTO PCI in ACA among 14,173 patients who underwent 14,470 CTO PCIs at 46 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023. Of 14,470 CTO PCIs, 36 (0.24%) were CTO PCIs in an ACA. ACA patients had similar baseline characteristics as those without an ACA. The type of ACA in which the CTO lesion was found were as follows: anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (ARCA) (17, 48.5%), anomalous origin of left circumflex coronary artery (9, 25.7%), left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery with separate origins (4, 11.4%), anomalous origin of the left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%), dual left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%) and woven coronary artery 1 (2.8%). The Japan CTO score was similar between both groups (2.17 ± 1.32 vs 2.38 ± 1.26, p = 0.30). The target CTO in ACA patients was more likely to have moderate/severe tortuosity (44% vs 28%, p = 0.035), required more often use of retrograde approach (27% vs 12%, p = 0.028), and was associated with longer procedure (142.5 min vs 112.00 min [74.0, 164.0], p = 0.028) and fluoroscopy (56 min [40, 79 ml] vs 42 min [25, 67], p = 0.014) time and higher contrast volume (260 ml [190, 450] vs 200 ml [150, 300], p = 0.004) but had similar procedural (91.4% vs 85.6%, p = 0.46) and technical (91.4% vs 87.0%, p = 0.59) success. No major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were seen in ACA patients (0% [0] vs 1.9% [281] in non-ACA patients, p = 1.00). Two coronary perforations were reported in ACA CTO PCI (p = 0.7 vs. non-ACA CTO PCI). CTO PCI of ACA comprise 0.24% of all CTO PCIs performed in the PROGRESS CTO registry and was associated with higher procedural complexity but similar technical and procedural success rates and similar MACE compared with non-ACA CTO PCI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is limited information about the frequency and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in anomalous coronary arteries (ACA).
METHODS
METHODS
We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of CTO PCI in ACA among 14,173 patients who underwent 14,470 CTO PCIs at 46 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 14,470 CTO PCIs, 36 (0.24%) were CTO PCIs in an ACA. ACA patients had similar baseline characteristics as those without an ACA. The type of ACA in which the CTO lesion was found were as follows: anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (ARCA) (17, 48.5%), anomalous origin of left circumflex coronary artery (9, 25.7%), left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery with separate origins (4, 11.4%), anomalous origin of the left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%), dual left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%) and woven coronary artery 1 (2.8%). The Japan CTO score was similar between both groups (2.17 ± 1.32 vs 2.38 ± 1.26, p = 0.30). The target CTO in ACA patients was more likely to have moderate/severe tortuosity (44% vs 28%, p = 0.035), required more often use of retrograde approach (27% vs 12%, p = 0.028), and was associated with longer procedure (142.5 min vs 112.00 min [74.0, 164.0], p = 0.028) and fluoroscopy (56 min [40, 79 ml] vs 42 min [25, 67], p = 0.014) time and higher contrast volume (260 ml [190, 450] vs 200 ml [150, 300], p = 0.004) but had similar procedural (91.4% vs 85.6%, p = 0.46) and technical (91.4% vs 87.0%, p = 0.59) success. No major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were seen in ACA patients (0% [0] vs 1.9% [281] in non-ACA patients, p = 1.00). Two coronary perforations were reported in ACA CTO PCI (p = 0.7 vs. non-ACA CTO PCI).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
CTO PCI of ACA comprise 0.24% of all CTO PCIs performed in the PROGRESS CTO registry and was associated with higher procedural complexity but similar technical and procedural success rates and similar MACE compared with non-ACA CTO PCI.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Gentile F, Castiglione V, De Caterina R. Coronary artery anomalies. Circulation. 2021;144(12):983‐996. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055347
Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;21(1):28‐40. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810210110
Graidis C, Dimitriadis D, Karasavvidis V, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery anomalies in an adult population undergoing multidetector‐row computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:112. doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0098-x
Cocco N, Madonna R, Cammalleri V, et al. Percutaneous treatment of a CTO in an anomalous right coronary artery: a rupture paved the way for new insights. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:916616. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.916616
Patra S, Halder A, Chakraborty R, Dey S. Percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusion of anomalous right coronary artery: an onerous journey. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;11(5):624‐627.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)‐‐a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377‐381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Ybarra LF, Rinfret S, Brilakis ES, et al. Definitions and clinical trial design principles for coronary artery chronic total occlusion therapies: CTO‐ARC consensus recommendations. Circulation. 2021;143(5):479‐500. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046754
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2551‐2567. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184
Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 Minutes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):213‐221. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.024
Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(1):1‐9. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.022
Simsek B, Kostantinis S, Karacsonyi J, et al. Predicting periprocedural complications in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(14):1413‐1422. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.007
Kostantinis S, Simsek B, Karacsonyi J, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting clinical coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: the PROGRESS‐CTO perforation score. EuroIntervention. 2023;18(12):1022‐1030. doi:10.4244/eij-d-22-00593
Angelini P. Normal and anomalous coronary arteries: definitions and classification. Am Heart J. 1989;117(2):418‐434. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(89)90789-8
Lau WR, Lee PT, Koh CH. Coronary artery anomalies—state of the art review. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48(11):101935. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101935
Cheezum MK, Liberthson RR, Shah NR, et al. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery from the inappropriate sinus of valsalva. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(12):1592‐1608. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.031
Benezet J, Agarrado A, Oneto J. Successful transradial antegrade recanalization of a chronic total occlusion of an anomalous circumflex artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2017;87(2):180‐182. doi:10.1016/j.acmx.2016.06.007
Vijayvergiya R, Gupta A, Kanabar K, Paramasivam G, Kasinadhuni G. Percutaneous coronary intervention of anomalous left circumflex coronary artery—a case series. Indian Heart J. 2020;72(3):200‐201. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2020.05.002
Morgan KP, Morris GM, Al‐Najjar Y, et al. Percutaneous intervention on anomalous circumflex coronary arteries‐‐a single centre experience. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2012;13(6):335‐340. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2012.08.004
West NEJ, McKenna CJ, Ormerod O, Forfar JC, Banning AP, Channon KM. Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment in anomalously‐arising left circumflex coronary arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68(6):882‐890. doi:10.1002/ccd.20807
Sarkar K, Sharma SK, Kini AS. Catheter selection for coronary angiography and intervention in anomalous right coronary arteries. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22(3):234‐239. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00463.x
Abdou SM, Wu CJ. Treatment of aortocoronary dissection complicating anomalous origin right coronary artery and chronic total intervention with intravascular ultrasound guided stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78(6):914‐919. Epub 20110606 doi:10.1002/ccd.23021
Kaneda H, Takahashi S, Saito S. Successful coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in an anomalous right coronary artery using the retrograde approach via a collateral vessel. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19(1):1‐4.
Yamada R, Hirohata A, Kume T, Neishi Y, Uemura S. Retrograde coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion of RCA ostium with anomalous origin: a case report. J Cardiol Cases. 2019;19(6):182‐185. doi:10.1016/j.jccase.2019.01.003
Fang HY, Wu CC, Wu CJ. Successful transradial antegrade coronary intervention of a rare right coronary artery high anterior downward takeoff anomalous chronic total occlusion by double‐anchoring technique and retrograde guidance. Int Heart J. 2009;50(4):531‐538. doi:10.1536/ihj.50.531
Senguttuvan NB, Sharma SK, Kini A. Percutaneous intervention of chronic total occlusion of anomalous right coronary artery originating from left sinus—use of mother and child technique using guideliner. Indian Heart J. 2015;67(suppl 3):S41‐S42. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2015.10.300
Porwal SC, Vishwanath H, Tasgaonkar R, Sitapara T, Thakkar A. Percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusion of anomalous right coronary artery. Int J Clin Med. 2014;05:567‐571.
Young L, Harb SC, Puri R, Khatri J. Percutaneous coronary intervention of an anomalous coronary chronic total occlusion: the added value of three‐dimensional printing. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(2):330‐335. doi:10.1002/ccd.28625
Gasparini GL, Oreglia JA, Reimers B. Successful retrograde recanalization of a very rare anomalous OriginRight coronary artery chronic total occlusion. J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn. 2017;5:2. doi:10.4172/2329-9517.1000263