Can natural zeolite improve the removal of micropollutants in a nitrifying sequencing batch reactor? Insights on bioreactor performance, kinetics, and microbial community using Ibuprofen and Diclofenac as model micropollutants.
DFC
IBP
SBR
natural zeolite
nitrification
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
15
03
2024
revised:
16
09
2024
accepted:
01
10
2024
medline:
5
10
2024
pubmed:
5
10
2024
entrez:
4
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study presents the effect of natural zeolite (NZ) on a nitrifying sequencing batch reactor for removing ibuprofen (IBP) and diclofenac (DFC) in the long term, including kinetics and microbial community. The research was conducted in two 2 L liquid-volume bioreactors, one with 5 g/L of NZ. Nitrogen load rates ranging between 5.8 and 8.5 mg N/L h were studied. Bioreactors were operated for 217 days, with IBP and DFC concentrations ranging between 20 and 2,000 μg/L. The results showed that using NZ in a nitrifying SBR only improves IBP removal at low concentrations (40 μg/L). IBP and DFC do not affect the nitrification efficiency or kinetic of ammonia removal. In the presence of IBP and DFC, NZ also favored a higher relative abundance in the genus Nitrosomonas and the Bradyrhizobiaceae family (responsible for nitrite-oxidizing activity), allowing higher IBP degradations at low IBP concentrations. Finally, IBP and DFC stimulated heterotrophic nitrification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39366489
pii: S0045-6535(24)02353-1
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143455
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
143455Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: