Immediate Implants in Fibulas: Does the Implant to Fibula Osteotomy Distance Impact Early Implant Failure?


Journal

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
ISSN: 1531-5053
Titre abrégé: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8206428

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 22 04 2024
revised: 05 08 2024
accepted: 11 09 2024
medline: 5 10 2024
pubmed: 5 10 2024
entrez: 4 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

When placing dental implants in the free fibula flap, the osteotomy cut edge poses a unique challenge in that an optimal distance has not yet been established. The study aimed to measure the association between implant-to-fibula osteotomy edge distance and early implant failure in patients who received free fibula flap reconstruction with immediate implants. A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer with immediate dental implant placement for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022 at John Peter Smith Hospital. Subjects were excluded if the implant was in the middle of the free flap bordered by adjacent implants, was >10 mm from the osteotomy edge, or had insertional torque values of ≤30 Ncm. Primary predictor variable was the implant distance in millimeters from the fibula osteotomy edge. Primary outcome variable was early implant failure, defined as implant exfoliation noted by the patient or failure due to implant movement or pain necessitating explantation within 6 months of placement. The covariates were age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, history of head and neck radiation, pathology treated, and if postoperative radiation treatment was received. A generalized estimating equations model was used to assess the relation between the primary predictor and outcome. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. The sample was composed of 48 subjects who had 130 implants placed, with early failures occurring in 5 implants (3.9%) in 3 subjects. The mean age of the sample was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] 20) and 29 (60%) were male. The mean implant distances for early failures and nonfailures were 3.5 mm (SD 1.04) and 4.3 mm (SD 1.5), respectively. There was a statistically significant relation between implant distance and early implant failure (P = .005, odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.85). This study found that shorter distances between the implant and the edge of the fibula osteotomy are associated with early implant failure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
When placing dental implants in the free fibula flap, the osteotomy cut edge poses a unique challenge in that an optimal distance has not yet been established.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The study aimed to measure the association between implant-to-fibula osteotomy edge distance and early implant failure in patients who received free fibula flap reconstruction with immediate implants.
STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE UNASSIGNED
A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer with immediate dental implant placement for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022 at John Peter Smith Hospital. Subjects were excluded if the implant was in the middle of the free flap bordered by adjacent implants, was >10 mm from the osteotomy edge, or had insertional torque values of ≤30 Ncm.
PREDICTOR VARIABLE METHODS
Primary predictor variable was the implant distance in millimeters from the fibula osteotomy edge.
MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE METHODS
Primary outcome variable was early implant failure, defined as implant exfoliation noted by the patient or failure due to implant movement or pain necessitating explantation within 6 months of placement.
COVARIATES UNASSIGNED
The covariates were age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, history of head and neck radiation, pathology treated, and if postoperative radiation treatment was received.
ANALYSES METHODS
A generalized estimating equations model was used to assess the relation between the primary predictor and outcome. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS RESULTS
The sample was composed of 48 subjects who had 130 implants placed, with early failures occurring in 5 implants (3.9%) in 3 subjects. The mean age of the sample was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] 20) and 29 (60%) were male. The mean implant distances for early failures and nonfailures were 3.5 mm (SD 1.04) and 4.3 mm (SD 1.5), respectively. There was a statistically significant relation between implant distance and early implant failure (P = .005, odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.85).
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE CONCLUSIONS
This study found that shorter distances between the implant and the edge of the fibula osteotomy are associated with early implant failure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39366664
pii: S0278-2391(24)00841-3
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.09.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Timothy W Neal (TW)

Resident, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern/Parkland Memorial Hospital. Electronic address: Timothy.Neal@UTSouthwestern.edu.

Fayette C Williams (FC)

Director, Maxillofacial Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital Health Network, Fort Worth, TX.

Brian R Carr (BR)

Resident, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern/Parkland Memorial Hospital.

Taylor Pankey (T)

Resident, John Peter Smith Hospital Health Network, Fort Worth, TX.

Kari Teigen (K)

Office of Clinical Research, John Peter Smith Hospital Health Network, Fort Worth, TX.

Roderick Y Kim (RY)

Vice Director, Maxillofacial Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital Health Network, Fort Worth, TX.

Classifications MeSH