Effect of low molecular weight phenols on the in-mouth sensory perception of high molecular weight phenols by analyzing reconstituted wines.
Astringency
Bitterness
Phenols
Reconstituted wines
Sensory analysis
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
27
03
2024
revised:
19
08
2024
accepted:
23
09
2024
medline:
6
10
2024
pubmed:
6
10
2024
entrez:
5
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This research aimed to assess the contribution of monomeric phenols to the perception of bitterness and astringency by means of wine reconstitution experiments. Six wines with distinct total polyphenol indexes were selected and fractioned by preparative liquid chromatography into two fractions. Thirty-one reconstituted wines were prepared by combining distinct low molecular weight fractions (L) with different high molecular weight fractions (H). In-mouth attributes of reconstituted and reference wines were described by a trained sensory panel. Fractions were chemically characterized by UPLC-MS. No significant differences among sensory results were found between reference and reconstituted wines. Bitterness and astringency perception were strongly influenced by total proanthocyanidins content. Flavan-3-ol monomers and dimers were only responsible for astringency in wines with a low content of proanthocyanidins, as was the case in rosé wine. Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide and several anthocyanins presented correlations with bitterness in the reconstituted wines; notwithstanding, several interactions with this attribute were observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39368200
pii: S0308-8146(24)03072-3
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141422
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
141422Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.