Emotional competence self-help mobile phone app versus cognitive behavioural self-help app versus self-monitoring app to promote mental wellbeing in healthy young adults (ECoWeB PROMOTE): an international, multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Digital health
ISSN: 2589-7500
Titre abrégé: Lancet Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101751302

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 21 05 2024
accepted: 03 07 2024
medline: 6 10 2024
pubmed: 6 10 2024
entrez: 5 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Based on evidence that mental health is more than an absence of mental disorders, there have been calls to find ways to promote flourishing at a population level, especially in young people, which requires effective and scalable interventions. Despite their potential for scalability, few mental wellbeing apps have been rigorously tested in high-powered trials, derived from models of healthy emotional functioning, or tailored to individual profiles. We aimed to test a personalised emotional competence self-help app versus a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) self-help app versus a self-monitoring app to promote mental wellbeing in healthy young people. This international, multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial within a cohort multiple randomised trial (including a parallel trial of depression prevention) was done at four university trial sites in four countries (the UK, Germany, Spain, and Belgium). Participants were recruited from schools and universities and via social media from the four respective countries. Eligible participants were aged 16-22 years with well adjusted emotional competence profiles and no current or past diagnosis of major depression. Participants were randomised (1:1:1) to usual practice plus either the emotional competence app, the CBT app or the self-monitoring app, by an independent computerised system, minimised by country, age, and self-reported gender, and followed up for 12 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome was mental wellbeing (indexed by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well Being Scale [WEMWBS]) at 3-month follow-up, analysed in participants who completed the 3-month follow-up assessment. Outcome assessors were masked to group allocation. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04148508, and is closed. Between Oct 15, 2020, and Aug 3, 2021, 2532 participants were enrolled, and 847 were randomly assigned to the emotional competence app, 841 to the CBT app, and 844 to the self-monitoring app. Mean age was 19·2 years (SD 1·8). Of 2532 participants self-reporting gender, 1896 (74·9%) were female, 613 (24·2%) were male, 16 (0·6%) were neither, and seven (0·3%) were both. 425 participants in the emotional competence app group, 443 in the CT app group, and 447 in the self-monitoring app group completed the follow-up assessment at 3 months. There was no difference in mental wellbeing between the groups at 3 months (global p=0·47). The emotional competence app did not differ from the CBT app (mean difference in WEMWBS -0·21 [95% CI -1·08 to 0·66]) or the self-monitoring app (0·32 [-0·54 to 1·19]) and the CBT app did not differ from the self-monitoring app (0·53 [-0·33 to 1·39]). 14 of 1315 participants were admitted to or treated in hospital (or both) for mental health-related reasons, which were considered unrelated to the interventions (five participants in the emotional competence app group, eight in the CBT app group, and one in the self-monitoring app group). No deaths occurred. The emotional competence app and the CBT app provided limited benefit in promoting mental wellbeing in healthy young people. This finding might reflect the low intensity of these interventions and the difficulty improving mental wellbeing via universal digital interventions implemented in low-risk populations. European Commission.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Based on evidence that mental health is more than an absence of mental disorders, there have been calls to find ways to promote flourishing at a population level, especially in young people, which requires effective and scalable interventions. Despite their potential for scalability, few mental wellbeing apps have been rigorously tested in high-powered trials, derived from models of healthy emotional functioning, or tailored to individual profiles. We aimed to test a personalised emotional competence self-help app versus a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) self-help app versus a self-monitoring app to promote mental wellbeing in healthy young people.
METHODS METHODS
This international, multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial within a cohort multiple randomised trial (including a parallel trial of depression prevention) was done at four university trial sites in four countries (the UK, Germany, Spain, and Belgium). Participants were recruited from schools and universities and via social media from the four respective countries. Eligible participants were aged 16-22 years with well adjusted emotional competence profiles and no current or past diagnosis of major depression. Participants were randomised (1:1:1) to usual practice plus either the emotional competence app, the CBT app or the self-monitoring app, by an independent computerised system, minimised by country, age, and self-reported gender, and followed up for 12 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome was mental wellbeing (indexed by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well Being Scale [WEMWBS]) at 3-month follow-up, analysed in participants who completed the 3-month follow-up assessment. Outcome assessors were masked to group allocation. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04148508, and is closed.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Between Oct 15, 2020, and Aug 3, 2021, 2532 participants were enrolled, and 847 were randomly assigned to the emotional competence app, 841 to the CBT app, and 844 to the self-monitoring app. Mean age was 19·2 years (SD 1·8). Of 2532 participants self-reporting gender, 1896 (74·9%) were female, 613 (24·2%) were male, 16 (0·6%) were neither, and seven (0·3%) were both. 425 participants in the emotional competence app group, 443 in the CT app group, and 447 in the self-monitoring app group completed the follow-up assessment at 3 months. There was no difference in mental wellbeing between the groups at 3 months (global p=0·47). The emotional competence app did not differ from the CBT app (mean difference in WEMWBS -0·21 [95% CI -1·08 to 0·66]) or the self-monitoring app (0·32 [-0·54 to 1·19]) and the CBT app did not differ from the self-monitoring app (0·53 [-0·33 to 1·39]). 14 of 1315 participants were admitted to or treated in hospital (or both) for mental health-related reasons, which were considered unrelated to the interventions (five participants in the emotional competence app group, eight in the CBT app group, and one in the self-monitoring app group). No deaths occurred.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
The emotional competence app and the CBT app provided limited benefit in promoting mental wellbeing in healthy young people. This finding might reflect the low intensity of these interventions and the difficulty improving mental wellbeing via universal digital interventions implemented in low-risk populations.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
European Commission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39368870
pii: S2589-7500(24)00149-3
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00149-3
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04148508']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests ERW receives royalties from Guilford Press for a CBT treatment manual he authored and was an expert member of the NICE Guidelines for treatment of adult depression. MFr is a founder and shareholder of Monsenso. BWS is a founder and shareholder of audEERING. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Edward R Watkins (ER)

Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Electronic address: e.r.watkins@exeter.ac.uk.

Fiona C Warren (FC)

Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Alexandra Newbold (A)

Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Claire Hulme (C)

Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Timothy Cranston (T)

Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Benjamin Aas (B)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Holly Bear (H)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Cristina Botella (C)

Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Felix Burkhardt (F)

audEERING, Gilching, Germany.

Thomas Ehring (T)

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Mina Fazel (M)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Johnny R J Fontaine (JRJ)

Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Mads Frost (M)

Monsenso, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Azucena Garcia-Palacios (A)

Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Ellen Greimel (E)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Christiane Hößle (C)

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Arpine Hovasapian (A)

Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Veerle E I Huyghe (VEI)

Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Kostas Karpouzis (K)

Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.

Johanna Löchner (J)

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Guadalupe Molinari (G)

Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Reinhard Pekrun (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Belinda Platt (B)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Tabea Rosenkranz (T)

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Klaus R Scherer (KR)

University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Katja Schlegel (K)

University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Bjorn W Schuller (BW)

audEERING, Gilching, Germany; Embedded Intelligence for Health Care and Well-being, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany; Group on Language, Audio & Music, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Gerd Schulte-Korne (G)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Carlos Suso-Ribera (C)

Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Varinka Voigt (V)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Maria Voß (M)

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität Munchën, Munich, Germany.

Rod S Taylor (RS)

Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Classifications MeSH