Whole Blood Donor Iron Management Across Europe: Experiences and Challenges in Four Blood Establishments.

Blood donation Donor health Hemoglobin Iron deficiency

Journal

Transfusion medicine reviews
ISSN: 1532-9496
Titre abrégé: Transfus Med Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8709027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 11 06 2024
revised: 06 09 2024
accepted: 09 09 2024
medline: 7 10 2024
pubmed: 7 10 2024
entrez: 6 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Whole blood donors lose iron while donating and frequent blood donation is therefore known to induce a risk of iron deficiency and/or anemia. In this review we present, compare and discuss the pros and cons of 4 distinctive donor iron management strategies in England, Finland, the Netherlands, and Denmark. Donor iron management policies in the countries concerned are described for the year 2021, and data on donor and donation numbers, low hemoglobin (Hb) deferral rates and Hb levels are presented. In England Hb levels were only measured in donors failing a copper sulphate test, while in the other 3 countries Hb is measured at every donation. In Finland, donors considered at risk of iron deficiency receive iron supplements, while in the Netherlands, ferritin-guided donation intervals without iron supplementation are in place. In Denmark, iron supplementation is provided to donors with low ferritin levels. Low-Hb deferral rates and average Hb levels are quite similar across the included countries, with the exception of higher deferral rates in England. To conclude, despite significant diversity in donor iron management approaches, low Hb deferral rates and average Hb levels are similar among the included countries except for England, where higher deferral rates were observed that are likely attributed to the absence of iron supplementation or ferritin-guided deferral. Achieving an optimal, more tailored iron management strategy requires further research and a nuanced understanding of both donor demographics and physiological responses to optimize the effectiveness and safety of blood donation practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39369584
pii: S0887-7963(24)00050-6
doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150860
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

150860

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest KvdH, MA, DJR, JC and CE are employed by organizations responsible for supplying adequate quantities of safe blood products to hospitals in their respective countries/regions. CE has received unrestricted research grants from Abbott Diagnostics, administered by Aarhus University Hospital, and Novo Nordisk, administered by Aarhus University.

Auteurs

K van den Hurk (K)

Donor Health, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Dept of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health (APH) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: k.vandenhurk@sanquin.nl.

M Arvas (M)

Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Research and Development, Helsinki, Finland.

D J Roberts (DJ)

NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Department of Haematology, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

J Castrén (J)

Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Research and Development, Helsinki, Finland.

C Erikstrup (C)

Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH