Headache trajectories in children and adolescents with new onset continuous headache.
headache
new daily persistent headache
outcomes
pediatric.
Journal
Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache
ISSN: 1468-2982
Titre abrégé: Cephalalgia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8200710
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
7
10
2024
pubmed:
7
10
2024
entrez:
7
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a challenging and understudied primary headache disorder with no known effective treatment. Although the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria require that the new onset continuous headache be present for at least three months before diagnosing NDPH, the biologic basis for when a new, continuous headache starts to behave as NDPH is unknown, and some pediatric headache experts consider that the minimum duration criterion could be shorter. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the intake questionnaires and medical records of 5-17 year-olds seen in neurology clinic for headache at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Those with a new onset continuous headache of at least one month in duration were eligible. The patient's self-report and clinician's description both had to indicate that the headache was new, of abrupt onset, and continuous to be included, although patients were allowed to have a prior history of infrequent headaches. We compared headache outcomes at last follow-up and at one year after continuous headache onset between those who had a continuous headache duration of 1 to <3 months ("new onset headache", or NOH) at first visit vs. those with ≥3 months (NDPH). We used multivariate regression modeling to examine for predictors of headache outcomes. Of 472 patient records reviewed, 172 met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 84 had a headache duration of 1 to <3 months in duration and 88 had a duration of ≥3 months. Those with shorter duration continuous headache were younger (median (interquartile range) 13.5 (11.1-15.7) vs. 15.1 (12.3-16.5) years, and less likely to have previously received a prescription preventive for the continuous headache (n = 14 (17%) vs. 26 (30%), p = 0.046), but were otherwise similar to those with NDPH in terms of baseline clinical and demographic variables. Sixty-five (74%) of those with NDPH and 60 (71%) with NOH had follow-up data. At last clinic follow-up, 41/65 (63%) with NDPH and 43/60 (72%) with NOH had experienced any headache benefit ( Headache outcomes of children and adolescents with new onset continuous headache, whether of 1 to <3 months (NOH) or ≥3 months in duration (NDPH) are suboptimal. More research is needed to improve treatment outcomes for this patient population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a challenging and understudied primary headache disorder with no known effective treatment. Although the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria require that the new onset continuous headache be present for at least three months before diagnosing NDPH, the biologic basis for when a new, continuous headache starts to behave as NDPH is unknown, and some pediatric headache experts consider that the minimum duration criterion could be shorter.
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective study, we reviewed the intake questionnaires and medical records of 5-17 year-olds seen in neurology clinic for headache at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Those with a new onset continuous headache of at least one month in duration were eligible. The patient's self-report and clinician's description both had to indicate that the headache was new, of abrupt onset, and continuous to be included, although patients were allowed to have a prior history of infrequent headaches. We compared headache outcomes at last follow-up and at one year after continuous headache onset between those who had a continuous headache duration of 1 to <3 months ("new onset headache", or NOH) at first visit vs. those with ≥3 months (NDPH). We used multivariate regression modeling to examine for predictors of headache outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 472 patient records reviewed, 172 met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 84 had a headache duration of 1 to <3 months in duration and 88 had a duration of ≥3 months. Those with shorter duration continuous headache were younger (median (interquartile range) 13.5 (11.1-15.7) vs. 15.1 (12.3-16.5) years, and less likely to have previously received a prescription preventive for the continuous headache (n = 14 (17%) vs. 26 (30%), p = 0.046), but were otherwise similar to those with NDPH in terms of baseline clinical and demographic variables. Sixty-five (74%) of those with NDPH and 60 (71%) with NOH had follow-up data. At last clinic follow-up, 41/65 (63%) with NDPH and 43/60 (72%) with NOH had experienced any headache benefit (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Headache outcomes of children and adolescents with new onset continuous headache, whether of 1 to <3 months (NOH) or ≥3 months in duration (NDPH) are suboptimal. More research is needed to improve treatment outcomes for this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39370854
doi: 10.1177/03331024241282803
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3331024241282803Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interestsCS: Dr Szperka or her institution have received compensation for serving as a consultant for AbbVie and Teva. She has received personal compensation for serving on a data safety monitoring board for Eli Lilly and Upsher-Smith. She has also received research support from the NIH NINDS (K23NS102521), PCORI and the CHOP CARES/ Doris Duke COVID-19 Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists. ME: None. CPG: Dr Patterson Gentile has received salary support from grants from the American Academy of Neurology Clinical Research Training Scholarship in the past 24 months, and is currently funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS124986). PP: None. NR: None. BMP: None. ADH: Dr Hershey or his institution have received compensation for serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Supernus, Teva, Theranica and Upsher-Smith. His institution has also received research support from Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Theranica, Upsher-Smith, and the NIH NINDS/NICHDS. AAG: In the last 24 months, Dr Gelfand has received honoraria from UpToDate (for authorship) and from the Headache Cooperative of the Pacific and the Taiwan Headache Society for speaking. She receives payment to her institution from the American Headache Society for her role as Editor of