Predictive models of post-traumatic stress disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety in children and adolescents following a single-event trauma.

PTSD adolescents anxiety children depression predictors trauma

Journal

Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 7 10 2024
pubmed: 7 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study examined the power of theory-derived models to account for the development of PTSD, Complex PTSD (CPTSD), depression, and anxiety in children and adolescents who had experienced a single-event trauma. Children ( At nine weeks post-trauma, 64% did not meet criteria for any disorder, 23.5% met criteria for PTSD, and 5.2% met criteria for CPTSD. 23.9% and 10.7% had developed clinically significant symptoms of depression and GAD, respectively. A cognitive model was the most powerful predictive model, a psychosocial model was weak, and subjective markers of event severity were more powerful than objective measures. Youth exposed to single-incident trauma may develop different forms of psychopathology, and PTSD and CPTSD are frequently experienced alongside other conditions. The cognitive model of PTSD shows utility in identifying predictors of PTSD, CPTSD, depression, and GAD, particularly the role of trauma-related negative appraisals. This supports the application of cognitive interventions which focus upon re-appraising trauma-related beliefs in youth.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study examined the power of theory-derived models to account for the development of PTSD, Complex PTSD (CPTSD), depression, and anxiety in children and adolescents who had experienced a single-event trauma.
METHODS METHODS
Children (
RESULTS RESULTS
At nine weeks post-trauma, 64% did not meet criteria for any disorder, 23.5% met criteria for PTSD, and 5.2% met criteria for CPTSD. 23.9% and 10.7% had developed clinically significant symptoms of depression and GAD, respectively. A cognitive model was the most powerful predictive model, a psychosocial model was weak, and subjective markers of event severity were more powerful than objective measures.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Youth exposed to single-incident trauma may develop different forms of psychopathology, and PTSD and CPTSD are frequently experienced alongside other conditions. The cognitive model of PTSD shows utility in identifying predictors of PTSD, CPTSD, depression, and GAD, particularly the role of trauma-related negative appraisals. This supports the application of cognitive interventions which focus upon re-appraising trauma-related beliefs in youth.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39371009
doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001648
pii: S0033291724001648
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Auteurs

Jessica Memarzia (J)

Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychological Therapies, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich, UK.

Katie Lofthouse (K)

Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychological Therapies, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich, UK.

Tim Dalgleish (T)

Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Adrian Boyle (A)

Emergency Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Anna McKinnon (A)

Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Clare Dixon (C)

Sussex Partnership National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK.

Patrick Smith (P)

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Richard Meiser-Stedman (R)

Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychological Therapies, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich, UK.

Classifications MeSH