Comparative Evaluation and Correlation of Hyoid Bone Position, Airway Dimension, and Psychological Status in Class II Vertical and Horizontal Malocclusion Cases With Temporomandibular Disorder Compared to Class I Non-Temporomandibular Disorder Cases.

hyoid bone psychological status temporomandibular disorder (tmd) tmd symptoms tmj disorders

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 22 07 2024
accepted: 04 09 2024
medline: 7 10 2024
pubmed: 7 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) involves discomfort and impaired function in the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with a multifaceted etiology that includes biomechanical, neuromuscular, psychological, and biological factors. This research aims to assess and correlate the hyoid bone position, airway dimensions, and psychological status in class II Hz (horizontal) and Vt (vertical) malocclusion cases with TMD in contrast to non-TMD class I cases. Methodology This research was carried out at the Orthodontics Department, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Sawangi, with consent obtained from the ethical committee. A total of 63 adult patients with class I, class II horizontal, and class II vertical malocclusions were selected. TMD was diagnosed using the Helkimo index, and patients were categorized accordingly. Psychological status was evaluated using the Warwick-Edinburgh scale, while the placement of hyoid bone and airway dimensions were assessed using lateral cephalograms. Statistical analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS version 27.0, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results The research showed a noteworthy difference in the hyoid bone's location, airway dimensions, and psychological status among the three groups. Class II TMD patients (both vertical and horizontal) exhibited higher hyoid bone positions and larger Go-Hy-Me angles (angle formed by the gonion-hyoid line and the hyoid-menton line) compared to class I patients. In addition, class II vertical TMD patients showed the most reduced airway dimensions. Psychological assessments indicated higher stress, anxiety, and depression levels in class II TMD patients, particularly in the vertical group, compared to class I non-TMD patients. Conclusion This study highlights the intricate relationships between hyoid bone position, airway dimensions, and psychological status in TMD patients. TMD patients present with hyoid bones positioned closer to the cranium and mandible, larger Go-Hy-Me angles, and reduced airway dimensions. Psychological distress exacerbates TMD symptoms, negatively impacting overall well-being and quality of life. Orthodontists should consider these interrelated factors when devising treatment plans to improve patient outcomes. Future longitudinal studies with larger samples and advanced imaging techniques are recommended to further elucidate these interactions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39371831
doi: 10.7759/cureus.68648
pmc: PMC11451583
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e68648

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Surendran et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research issued approval DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2023/1151. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Auteurs

Aathira Surendran (A)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Pallavi Daigavane (P)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Sunita Shrivastav (S)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Ranjit Kamble (R)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Abhishek D Sanchla (AD)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Lovely Bharti (L)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

Mrudula Shinde (M)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Aditya V Pareek (AV)

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, IND.

Classifications MeSH