Prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia according to three fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria: A secondary analysis study.


Journal

Scandinavian journal of pain
ISSN: 1877-8879
Titre abrégé: Scand J Pain
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101520867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 12 2023
accepted: 25 03 2024
medline: 7 10 2024
pubmed: 7 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of fibromyalgia (FM) according to different diagnostic criteria in a clinical sample and to explore the clinical characteristics in cases and non-cases by the diagnostic criteria used. A sample of 182 participants, both positive (n = 120) and negative (n = 62) FM individuals according to a clinical, pragmatic classification was used. Their characteristics were explored according to three different FM diagnostic criteria, i.e., the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990, ACR 2016, and APS Pain Taxonomy (AAPT), respectively. Thus, impact of FM (FIQ), symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS), tender point (TP) counts, and mechanical pressure sensitivity (in kPa) were compared in cases versus non-cases depending on diagnostic criteria of FM used. Descriptive analyses used chi-square statistic for categorical variables and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. From the clinical positive FM sample (n = 120), n = 99, 108, and 110 persons were diagnosed positive according to the ACR 1990, ACR 2016, and AAPT FM diagnostic criteria, respectively. All these three diagnostic tools discriminated FM positively from diagnostic FM non-cases when measuring TP-counts, mechanical pressures, and most FIQ-items, but they varied for anxiety and depression. The prevalence of FM differed somewhat with the use of ACR 1990, ACR 2016, and the AAPT as diagnostic tools. The anxiety and depression symptoms differed significantly between cases and non-cases using some but not all the diagnostic criteria. Regarding other FM symptoms, e.g., TPs and most FIQ items, all diagnostic criteria contrasted case from non-case.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39372320
doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0143
pii: sjpain-2023-0143
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter.

Auteurs

Egil A Fors (EA)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practitioner Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Knut-Arne Wensaas (KA)

Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.

Anne-Sofie Helvik (AS)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practitioner Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH