Concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam in bile fluid-a prospective phase IIb study.


Journal

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN: 1460-2091
Titre abrégé: J Antimicrob Chemother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513617

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 21 02 2024
accepted: 24 09 2024
medline: 7 10 2024
pubmed: 7 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The rise in carbapenem-resistant bacteria and the limited number of effective antibiotics pose a major health-care threat. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) represents an approved treatment option for carbapenem-resistant intra-abdominal infections. However, data on the pharmacokinetic profile of AVI in the hepatobiliary compartment is lacking. To provide clinical in vivo data on the concentration of AVI in bile fluid as a surrogate for hepatobiliary excretion. A single dose of 2000/500 mg CAZ/AVI was administered prolonged over 2 h to 10 patients prior to abdominal surgery, with bile samples available in nine patients in this phase IIb study (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023533). Antibiotic concentrations in plasma (0-8 h), bile (after resection) and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined. The mean concentration across individuals in bile was 33.5 mg/L (±20.5 mg/L) for CAZ and 7.1 mg/L (±3.5 mg/L) for AVI, resulting in bile/plasma ratios of 0.58 (±0.26) and 0.61 (±0.18). The Cmax in plasma was 87.2 mg/L (±25.0 mg/L) for CAZ and 18.6 mg/L (±6.29 mg/L) for AVI, with AUC0-∞ values of 351 h·mg/L (±104 h·mg/L) and 72.1 h·mg/L (±32.1 h·mg/L), respectively. Plasma concentrations of both CAZ and AVI remained more than 50% of the dosing interval above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC > 50%; MICCAZ = 8 mg/L, MICAVI = 1 mg/L) in all patients. No antibiotic-associated side effects were reported during the 30-day follow-up. The concentrations of CAZ and AVI in bile suggest their potential as a valuable therapeutic option for multi-resistant biliary infections.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The rise in carbapenem-resistant bacteria and the limited number of effective antibiotics pose a major health-care threat. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) represents an approved treatment option for carbapenem-resistant intra-abdominal infections. However, data on the pharmacokinetic profile of AVI in the hepatobiliary compartment is lacking.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To provide clinical in vivo data on the concentration of AVI in bile fluid as a surrogate for hepatobiliary excretion.
METHODS METHODS
A single dose of 2000/500 mg CAZ/AVI was administered prolonged over 2 h to 10 patients prior to abdominal surgery, with bile samples available in nine patients in this phase IIb study (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023533). Antibiotic concentrations in plasma (0-8 h), bile (after resection) and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean concentration across individuals in bile was 33.5 mg/L (±20.5 mg/L) for CAZ and 7.1 mg/L (±3.5 mg/L) for AVI, resulting in bile/plasma ratios of 0.58 (±0.26) and 0.61 (±0.18). The Cmax in plasma was 87.2 mg/L (±25.0 mg/L) for CAZ and 18.6 mg/L (±6.29 mg/L) for AVI, with AUC0-∞ values of 351 h·mg/L (±104 h·mg/L) and 72.1 h·mg/L (±32.1 h·mg/L), respectively. Plasma concentrations of both CAZ and AVI remained more than 50% of the dosing interval above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC > 50%; MICCAZ = 8 mg/L, MICAVI = 1 mg/L) in all patients. No antibiotic-associated side effects were reported during the 30-day follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The concentrations of CAZ and AVI in bile suggest their potential as a valuable therapeutic option for multi-resistant biliary infections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39373639
pii: 7814820
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae361
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Pfizer
ID : #57882183

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Andrea Witowski (A)

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

Lars Palmowski (L)

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

Iris K Minichmayr (IK)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Markus Zeitlinger (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Christoph Dorn (C)

Institute of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Constantin Lier (C)

Institute of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Michael Adamzik (M)

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

Hartmuth Nowak (H)

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.
Zentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Medizininformatik und Datenwissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Tim Rahmel (T)

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

Classifications MeSH