The artificial intelligence revolution...in unethical publishing: Will AI worsen our dysfunctional publishing system?
Journal
The Journal of general physiology
ISSN: 1540-7748
Titre abrégé: J Gen Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985110R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Nov 2024
04 Nov 2024
Historique:
medline:
7
10
2024
pubmed:
7
10
2024
entrez:
7
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Scholarly publishing has been shaped by the pressure of a liquid economy to become an exercise in branding more than a vehicle for the advancement of science. The current revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to make matters worse. The new generation of large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in text generation and are already being used to write papers, grants, peer review reports, code for analyses, and even perform literature reviews. Although these models can be used in positive ways, the metrics and pressures of academia, along with our dysfunctional publishing system, stimulate their indiscriminate and uncritical use to speed up research outputs. Thus, LLMs are likely to amplify the worst incentives of academia, greatly increasing the volume of scientific literature while diluting its quality. At present, no effective solutions are evident to overcome this grim scenario, and nothing short of a cultural revolution within academia will be needed to realign the practice of science with its traditional ideal of a rigorous search for truth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39373656
pii: 277011
doi: 10.1085/jgp.202413654
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
ID : 001
Organisme : National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
ID : PQ 307888/2020-7
Informations de copyright
© 2024 França and Monserrat.