Applicability of epigenetic age models to next-generation methylation arrays.
DNA methylation
Epigenetic clock
Epigenetics
Journal
Genome medicine
ISSN: 1756-994X
Titre abrégé: Genome Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101475844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
10
06
2024
accepted:
19
09
2024
medline:
8
10
2024
pubmed:
8
10
2024
entrez:
7
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epigenetic clocks are mathematical models used to estimate epigenetic age based on DNA methylation at specific CpG sites. As new methylation microarrays are developed and older models discontinued, existing epigenetic clocks might become obsolete. Here, we explored the effects of the changes introduced in the new EPICv2 DNA methylation array on existing epigenetic clocks. We tested the performance of four epigenetic clocks on the probeset of the EPICv2 array using a dataset of 10,835 samples. We developed a new epigenetic age prediction model compatible across the 450 k, EPICv1, and EPICv2 microarrays and validated it on 2095 samples. We estimated technical noise and intra-subject variation using two datasets with repeated sampling. We used data from (i) cancer survivors who had undergone different therapies, (ii) breast cancer patients and controls, and (iii) an exercise-based interventional study, to test the ability of our model to detect alterations in epigenetic age acceleration in response to theoretically antiaging interventions. The results of the four epiclocks tested are significantly distorted by the EPICv2 probeset, causing an average difference of up to 25 years. Our new model produced highly accurate chronological age predictions, comparable to a state-of-the-art epiclock. The model reported the lowest epigenetic age acceleration in normal populations, as well as the lowest variation across technical replicates and repeated samples from the same subjects. Finally, our model reproduced previous results of increased epigenetic age acceleration in cancer patients and in survivors treated with radiation therapy, and no changes from exercise-based interventions. Existing epigenetic clocks require updates for full EPICv2 compatibility. Our new model translates the capabilities of state-of-the-art epigenetic clocks to the EPICv2 platform and is cross-compatible with older microarrays. The characterization of epigenetic age prediction variation provides useful metrics to contextualize the relevance of epigenetic age alterations. The analysis of data from subjects influenced by radiation, cancer, and exercise-based interventions shows that despite being good predictors of chronological age, neither a pathological state like breast cancer, a hazardous environmental factor (radiation), nor exercise (a beneficial intervention) caused significant changes in the values of the "epigenetic age" determined by these first-generation models.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Epigenetic clocks are mathematical models used to estimate epigenetic age based on DNA methylation at specific CpG sites. As new methylation microarrays are developed and older models discontinued, existing epigenetic clocks might become obsolete. Here, we explored the effects of the changes introduced in the new EPICv2 DNA methylation array on existing epigenetic clocks.
METHODS
METHODS
We tested the performance of four epigenetic clocks on the probeset of the EPICv2 array using a dataset of 10,835 samples. We developed a new epigenetic age prediction model compatible across the 450 k, EPICv1, and EPICv2 microarrays and validated it on 2095 samples. We estimated technical noise and intra-subject variation using two datasets with repeated sampling. We used data from (i) cancer survivors who had undergone different therapies, (ii) breast cancer patients and controls, and (iii) an exercise-based interventional study, to test the ability of our model to detect alterations in epigenetic age acceleration in response to theoretically antiaging interventions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results of the four epiclocks tested are significantly distorted by the EPICv2 probeset, causing an average difference of up to 25 years. Our new model produced highly accurate chronological age predictions, comparable to a state-of-the-art epiclock. The model reported the lowest epigenetic age acceleration in normal populations, as well as the lowest variation across technical replicates and repeated samples from the same subjects. Finally, our model reproduced previous results of increased epigenetic age acceleration in cancer patients and in survivors treated with radiation therapy, and no changes from exercise-based interventions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Existing epigenetic clocks require updates for full EPICv2 compatibility. Our new model translates the capabilities of state-of-the-art epigenetic clocks to the EPICv2 platform and is cross-compatible with older microarrays. The characterization of epigenetic age prediction variation provides useful metrics to contextualize the relevance of epigenetic age alterations. The analysis of data from subjects influenced by radiation, cancer, and exercise-based interventions shows that despite being good predictors of chronological age, neither a pathological state like breast cancer, a hazardous environmental factor (radiation), nor exercise (a beneficial intervention) caused significant changes in the values of the "epigenetic age" determined by these first-generation models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39375688
doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01387-4
pii: 10.1186/s13073-024-01387-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Bocklandt S, et al. Epigenetic predictor of age PloS one. 2011;6: e14821.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821
Jones MJ, Goodman SJ, Kobor MS. DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell. 2015;14:924–32.
doi: 10.1111/acel.12349
Ryan CP. “Epigenetic clocks”: Theory and applications in human biology. Am J Hum Biol. 2021;33: e23488.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23488
Oblak L, van der Zaag J, Higgins-Chen AT, Levine ME, Boks MP. A systematic review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with epigenetic clock acceleration. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;69: 101348.
doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101348
Bozack AK, et al. DNA methylation age at birth and childhood: performance of epigenetic clocks and characteristics associated with epigenetic age acceleration in the Project Viva cohort. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15:62.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01480-2
Christiansen L, et al. DNA methylation age is associated with mortality in a longitudinal Danish twin study. Aging Cell. 2016;15:149–54.
doi: 10.1111/acel.12421
Marioni RE, et al. DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6
Perna L, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration predicts cancer, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality in a German case cohort. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:1–7.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0228-z
Marioni RE, et al. The epigenetic clock is correlated with physical and cognitive fitness in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1388–96.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu277
Valencia CI, Saunders D, Daw J, Vasquez A. DNA methylation accelerated age as captured by epigenetic clocks influences breast cancer risk. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1029.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1150731
Berstein FM, et al. Assessing the causal role of epigenetic clocks in the development of multiple cancers: a Mendelian randomization study. Elife. 2022;11: e75374.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.75374
Rozenblit M, et al. Evidence of accelerated epigenetic aging of breast tissues in patients with breast cancer is driven by CpGs associated with polycomb-related genes. Clin Epigenetics. 2022;14:30.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01249-z
Gehle SC, et al. Accelerated epigenetic aging and myopenia in young adult cancer survivors. Cancer Med. 2023;12:12149–60.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.5908
Hannum G, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49:359–67.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:1–20.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Levine ME, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:573.
Belsky DW, et al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. Elife. 2022;11: e73420.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.73420
Lu AT, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:303.
Freire-Aradas A, et al. A common epigenetic clock from childhood to old age. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;60: 102743.
doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102743
Prosz A, et al. Biologically informed deep learning for explainable epigenetic clocks. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1306.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50495-5
Tomusiak, A. et al. Development of a novel epigenetic clock resistant to changes in immune cell composition. 2023. bioRxiv 2023–03.
Caulton A, et al. Development of epigenetic clocks for key ruminant species. Genes. 2021;13:96.
doi: 10.3390/genes13010096
Zoller JA, et al. DNA methylation clocks for clawed frogs reveal evolutionary conservation of epigenetic aging. GeroScience. 2024;46:945–60.
doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00840-3
Sala C, et al. Where are we in the implementation of tissue-specific epigenetic clocks? Front Bioinform. 2024;4:1306244.
doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1306244
Pośpiech E, Bar A, Pisarek-Pacek A, et al. Epigenetic clock in the aorta and age-related endothelial dysfunction in mice. GeroScience. 2024;46:3993–4002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01086-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01086-3
Voisin S, et al. An epigenetic clock for human skeletal muscle. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:887–98.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12556
Coninx E, et al. Hippocampal and cortical tissue-specific epigenetic clocks indicate an increased epigenetic age in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:20817.
Bernabeu E, et al. Refining epigenetic prediction of chronological and biological age. Genome Medicine. 2023;15:12.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01161-y
Bibikova M, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium® assay. Epigenomics. 2009;1:177–200.
doi: 10.2217/epi.09.14
Weisenberger DJ, Van Den Berg D, Pan F, Berman B, Laird P. Comprehensive DNA methylation analysis on the Illumina Infinium assay platform. San Diego: Illumina; 2008.
Pidsley R, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–17.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1
Noguera-Castells A, García-Prieto CA, Álvarez-Errico D, Esteller M. Validation of the new EPIC DNA methylation microarray (900K EPIC v2) for high-throughput profiling of the human DNA methylome. Epigenetics. 2023;18:2185742.
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2185742
Sandoval J, et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics. 2011;6:692–702.
doi: 10.4161/epi.6.6.16196
Moran S, Arribas C, Esteller M. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 850,000 CpG sites of the human genome enriched in enhancer sequences. Epigenomics. 2016;8:389–99.
doi: 10.2217/epi.15.114
Horvath S, et al. Epigenetic clock for skin and blood cells applied to Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome and ex vivo studies. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:1758.
Kaur D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the Infinium human MethylationEPIC v2 BeadChip. Epigenetics Communications. 2023;3:6.
doi: 10.1186/s43682-023-00021-5
Koncevičius K, et al. Epigenetic age oscillates during the day. Aging Cell. 2024;23:e14170.
doi: 10.1111/acel.14170
Apsley AT, et al. Biological stability of DNA methylation measurements over varying intervals of time and in the presence of acute stress. Epigenetics. 2023;18:2230686.
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2230686
Oh G, et al. Circadian oscillations of cytosine modification in humans contribute to epigenetic variability, aging, and complex disease. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–14.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1608-9
Barrett T, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D991–5.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193
Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–10.
doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207
de Lima Camillo LP. pyaging: a Python-based compendium of GPU-optimized aging clocks. Bioinformatics. 2024;40:btae200.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae200
Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2005;67:301–20.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–30.
Zhang Q, et al. Improved precision of epigenetic clock estimates across tissues and its implication for biological ageing. Genome medicine. 2019;11:1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0667-1
Johnson ND, et al. Non-linear patterns in age-related DNA methylation may reflect CD4+ T cell differentiation. Epigenetics. 2017;12:492–503.
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1314419
Okada D, Cheng JH, Zheng C, Kumaki T, Yamada R. Data-driven identification and classification of nonlinear aging patterns reveals the landscape of associations between DNA methylation and aging. Hum Genomics. 2023;17:8.
doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00453-z
Carlsen L, Holländer O, Danzer MF, Vennemann M, Augustin C. DNA methylation-based age estimation for adults and minors: considering sex-specific differences and non-linear correlations. Int J Legal Med. 2023;137:635–43.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-02967-6
Bell CG, et al. DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–24.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y
Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:371–84.
doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3
Qin N, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration and chronic health conditions among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113:597–605.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa147
Dong Q, et al. Genome-wide association studies identify novel genetic loci for epigenetic age acceleration among survivors of childhood cancer. Genome Medicine. 2022;14:32.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01038-6
Sehl ME, Carroll JE, Horvath S, Bower JE. The acute effects of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy on peripheral blood epigenetic age in early stage breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020;6:23.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-0161-3
Xiao C, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration, fatigue, and inflammation in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a longitudinal study. Cancer. 2021;127:3361–71.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33641
Cappetta M, et al. Discovery of novel DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive sporadic breast cancer detection in the Latino population. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:473–86.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12842
Miranda Furtado CL, et al. Resistance and aerobic training increases genome-wide DNA methylation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Epigenetics. 2024;19:2305082.
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2305082
Ruegsegger GN, Booth FW. Health benefits of exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8: a029694.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029694
Mandolesi L, et al. Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front Psychol. 2018;9:509.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509
DiPietro L. Physical activity in aging: changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:13–22.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.suppl_2.13
Paterson DH, Jones GR, Rice CL. Ageing and physical activity: evidence to develop exercise recommendations for older adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:S69–108.
doi: 10.1139/H07-111
Grazioli E, et al. Physical activity in the prevention of human diseases: role of epigenetic modifications. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:111–23.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4193-5
Ferioli M, et al. Role of physical exercise in the regulation of epigenetic mechanisms in inflammation, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging process. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:14852–64.
doi: 10.1002/jcp.28304
Biological Age Test | Horvath’s Clock | myDNAge. https://mydnage.com/ .
TruDiagnostic.com. https://www.trudiagnostic.com/ .
Elysium Health - Healthy Aging Supplements. https://www.elysiumhealth.com/ .
Lee Y, et al. Blood-based epigenetic estimators of chronological age in human adults using DNA methylation data from the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07168-8
Knight AK, et al. An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1068-z
Wahl S, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity. Nature. 2017;541:81–6.
doi: 10.1038/nature20784
Kho M, et al. Epigenetic loci for blood pressure are associated with hypertensive target organ damage in older African Americans from the genetic epidemiology network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study. BMC Med Genomics. 2020;13:1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-00791-0
Robinson O, et al. Determinants of accelerated metabolomic and epigenetic aging in a UK cohort. Aging Cell. 2020;19: e13149.
doi: 10.1111/acel.13149
Kilaru V, et al. Critical evaluation of copy number variant calling methods using DNA methylation. Genet Epidemiol. 2020;44:148–58.
doi: 10.1002/gepi.22269
McRae AF, et al. Contribution of genetic variation to transgenerational inheritance of DNA methylation. Genome Biol. 2014;15:1–10.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r73
Kurushima Y, Tsai P, Castillo-Fernandez J, et al. Epigenetic findings in periodontitis in UK twins: a cross-sectional study. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0614-4
Zannas AS, et al. Epigenetic upregulation of FKBP5 by aging and stress contributes to NF-κB–driven inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:11370–9.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816847116
Hannon E, et al. An integrated genetic-epigenetic analysis of schizophrenia: evidence for co-localization of genetic associations and differential DNA methylation. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–16.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1041-x
Voisin S, et al. Many obesity-associated SNPs strongly associate with DNA methylation changes at proximal promoters and enhancers. Genome medicine. 2015;7:1–16.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0225-4
Liu Y, et al. Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:142–7.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2487
Horvath S, et al. An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–23.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0
Konigsberg IR, et al. Host methylation predicts SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical outcome. Communications medicine. 2021;1:42.
doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00042-y
Chuang YH, et al. Parkinson’s disease is associated with DNA methylation levels in human blood and saliva. Genome medicine. 2017;9:1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0466-5
Arloth J, et al. DeepWAS: Multivariate genotype-phenotype associations by directly integrating regulatory information using deep learning. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16: e1007616.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007616
Hannon E, et al. DNA methylation meta-analysis reveals cellular alterations in psychosis and markers of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Elife. 2021;10: e58430.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.58430
Kular L, et al. DNA methylation as a mediator of HLA-DRB1* 15: 01 and a protective variant in multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2397.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04732-5
Barturen G, et al. Whole blood DNA methylation analysis reveals respiratory environmental traits involved in COVID-19 severity following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4597.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32357-2
Oliva M, et al. DNA methylation QTL mapping across diverse human tissues provides molecular links between genetic variation and complex traits. Nat Genet. 2023;55:112–22.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01248-z
Roos L, et al. Integrative DNA methylome analysis of pan-cancer biomarkers in cancer discordant monozygotic twin-pairs. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:1–16.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0172-y
Johansson Å, Enroth S, Gyllensten U. Continuous aging of the human DNA methylome throughout the human lifespan. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e67378.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067378
Webster AP, et al. Donor whole blood DNA methylation is not a strong predictor of acute graft versus host disease in unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Front Genet. 2024;15:1242636.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1242636
Horvath S, Ritz BR. Increased epigenetic age and granulocyte counts in the blood of Parkinson’s disease patients. Aging. 2015;7:1130.
doi: 10.18632/aging.100859
Sánchez-Cabo F, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis and accelerated epigenetic age mediated by inflammation: a multi-omics study. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:2698–709.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad361
Crawford B, et al. DNA methylation and inflammation marker profiles associated with a history of depression. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:2840–50.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy199