The optic nerve sheath in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a cohort study.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 14 04 2024
accepted: 24 09 2024
medline: 8 10 2024
pubmed: 8 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Preeclampsia is implicated in 14% of maternal deaths worldwide, mostly due to complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral edema. Cerebral edema increases intracranial pressure, which can be predicted by ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Greater diameters have been reported in women with preeclampsia and eclampsia; however, data are lacking on the possible association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether there is an association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the ONSD, and between this measurement and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. This was a cohort study involving 183 women in the third trimester of pregnancy or within 24 h following childbirth, distributed as follows: control group (n = 30), gestational hypertension (n = 14), chronic hypertension (n = 12), preeclampsia without severe features (n = 12), preeclampsia with severe features (n = 62), superimposed preeclampsia (n = 23) and eclampsia (n = 30). The participants underwent ocular ultrasonography, and data on maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from the medical records. To compare the groups, analysis of variance was used for the normally distributed numerical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for variables with non-normal distribution. Two-tailed p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Overall comparison between the seven groups showed no statistically significant difference in the mean ONSD (p = 0.056). Nevertheless, diameters were significantly greater in the eclampsia group compared to the control group (p = 0.003). Greater diameters were associated with maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.01) and maternal near miss (p = 0.01). There was no association between ONSD and admission to the neonatal ICU (p = 0.1), neonatal near miss (p = 0.34) or neonatal death (p = 0.26). No association was found between ONSD and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the overall analysis; however, ONSD was greater in women with eclampsia compared to controls. Greater diameters were associated with maternal admission to the ICU and maternal near miss. These findings suggest a potential use for bedside ultrasound as an additional tool for stratifying risk in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Preeclampsia is implicated in 14% of maternal deaths worldwide, mostly due to complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral edema. Cerebral edema increases intracranial pressure, which can be predicted by ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Greater diameters have been reported in women with preeclampsia and eclampsia; however, data are lacking on the possible association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether there is an association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the ONSD, and between this measurement and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
This was a cohort study involving 183 women in the third trimester of pregnancy or within 24 h following childbirth, distributed as follows: control group (n = 30), gestational hypertension (n = 14), chronic hypertension (n = 12), preeclampsia without severe features (n = 12), preeclampsia with severe features (n = 62), superimposed preeclampsia (n = 23) and eclampsia (n = 30). The participants underwent ocular ultrasonography, and data on maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from the medical records. To compare the groups, analysis of variance was used for the normally distributed numerical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for variables with non-normal distribution. Two-tailed p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall comparison between the seven groups showed no statistically significant difference in the mean ONSD (p = 0.056). Nevertheless, diameters were significantly greater in the eclampsia group compared to the control group (p = 0.003). Greater diameters were associated with maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.01) and maternal near miss (p = 0.01). There was no association between ONSD and admission to the neonatal ICU (p = 0.1), neonatal near miss (p = 0.34) or neonatal death (p = 0.26).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
No association was found between ONSD and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the overall analysis; however, ONSD was greater in women with eclampsia compared to controls. Greater diameters were associated with maternal admission to the ICU and maternal near miss. These findings suggest a potential use for bedside ultrasound as an additional tool for stratifying risk in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39375707
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06858-5
pii: 10.1186/s12884-024-06858-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

654

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Narayan B, Nelson-Piercy C. Medical problems in pregnancy. Clin Med. 2016;16(Suppl 6):s110–6.
doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s110
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X pubmed: 25103301
Miller EC, Vollbracht S. Neurology of preeclampsia and related disorders: an update in neuro-obstetrics. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021;25:40.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00958-z pmcid: 10069269 pubmed: 33825997
Hammer ES, Cipolla MJ. Cerebrovascular dysfunction in preeclamptic pregnancies. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:64.
doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0575-8 pmcid: 4752117 pubmed: 26126779
Zeeman GG. Neurologic complications of pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:166–72.
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.003 pubmed: 19464507
Sterrett ME, Austin B, Barnes RM, Chang EY. Optic nerve sheath diameter in severe preeclampsia with neurologic features versus controls. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:224.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04548-8 pmcid: 8933926 pubmed: 35305582
Del Saz-Saucedo PD, Redondo-González O, Mateu-Mateu A, Huertas-Arroyo R, García-Ruiz R, Botia-Paniagua E. Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Sci. 2016;361:122–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.032 pubmed: 26810528
Dakson A, Kameda-Smith M, Staudt MD, Lavergne P, Makarenko S, Eagles ME, et al. A nationwide prospective multicenter study of external ventricular drainage: accuracy, safety, and related complications. J Neurosurg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.7.JNS21421 .
doi: 10.3171/2021.7.JNS21421 pubmed: 34826821
Berty Gutiérrez H, Carrera GE. Usefulness of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in hypertensive patients during pregnancy and the puerperium. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36:2187253.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2187253 pubmed: 36889743
Vitiello L, De Bernardo M, Capasso L, Cornetta P, Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasound evaluation in animals and normal subjects. Front Med. 2022;8:797018.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.797018
Hansen HC, Helmke K. Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure: ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:34–40.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0034 pubmed: 9202262
Soldatos T, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A. Optic nerve sonography: a new window for the non-invasive evaluation of intracranial pressure in brain injury. Emerg Med J. 2009;26:630–4.
doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.058453 pubmed: 19700575
Damiani D, Damiani D. [Non-invasive intracranial pressure evaluation in an emergency room – point-of-care ultrasonography]. Arq Bras Neurocir. 2019;38:279–83.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1594301
Dubost C, Le Gouez A, Jouffroy V, Roger-Christoph S, Benhamou D, Mercier FJ, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter used as ultrasonographic assessment of the incidence of raised intracranial pressure in preeclampsia: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1066–71.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea1a pubmed: 22258019
Bala R, Banerjee A, Taxak S, Kumar R. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured using ocular sonography is raised in patients with eclampsia. J Obstetric Anaesthesia Crit Care. 2019;9:65–9.
doi: 10.4103/joacc.JOACC_1_19
Arzpeyma SF, Khorram PB, Asgharnia M, Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Investigating the relationship between ultrasound measured optic nerve sheath diameter and preeclampsia. AIMS Medical Science. 2019;6:250–9.
doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.3.250
Marwen N, Sebri A, Fatnassi R. Mesure du diametre de la gaine du nerf optique:quelle correlation avec la severite de la preeclampsie? Revue Marocaine de Santé Publique. 2022;9:43–50.
Ali El-Din A, Diab DG, Abd El-Basir II, Reyad AR. Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as a surrogate measurement of intracranial pressure in preeclampsia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2021;84:2565–75.
doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.188553
Biswas J, Khatun N, Bandyopadhyay R, Bhattacharya N, Maitra A, Mukherjee S, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurements using ultrasonography to diagnose raised intracranial pressure in preeclampsia: an observational study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023;24:5–11.
doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-3-3 pmcid: 10019004 pubmed: 36919381
Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics in collaboration with Jimmy Espinoza, MD, MSc; Alex Vidaeff, MD, MPH; Christian M. Pettker, MD; and Hyagriv Simhan, MD. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e237–60.
Brzan Simenc G, Ambrozic J, Prokselj K, Tul N, Cvijic M, Mirkovic T, et al. Ocular ultrasonography for diagnosing increased intracranial pressure in patients with severe preeclampsia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018;36:49–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.06.005 pubmed: 30057149
Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC, WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss - towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:287–96.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 pubmed: 19303368
Pileggi C, Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Faúndes A. Neonatal near miss approach in the 2005 WHO Global Survey Brazil. J Pediatr. 2010;86:21–6.
Sedille L, Pierre F, Pourrat O, Desseauve D. Keeping eyes on preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:286–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.06.021 pubmed: 30177067
Brzan Simenc G, Ambrozic J, Osredkar J, Gersak K, Lucovnik M. Correlation between cerebral biomarkers and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with severe preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2021;40:9–14.
doi: 10.1080/10641955.2020.1849275 pubmed: 33205686
Singh SK, Bhatia K. Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as a surrogate measure of raised intracranial pressure in severe pregnancy-induced hypertension patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2018;12:42–6.
doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_218_17 pmcid: 5872891 pubmed: 29628552
Zeiler FA, Ziesmann MT, Goeres P, Unger B, Park J, Karakitsos D, et al. A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement. Crit Ultrasound J. 2016;8:9.
doi: 10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x pmcid: 4977242 pubmed: 27501699
Stevens RRF, Gommer ED, Aries MJH, Ertl M, Mess WH, Huberts W, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter assessment by neurosonology: a review of methodologic discrepancies. J Neuroimaging. 2021;31:814–25.
doi: 10.1111/jon.12906 pubmed: 34270144
Pansell J, Bell M, Rudberg P, Friman O, Cooray C. Optic nerve sheath diameter in intracranial hypertension: measurement external or internal of the dura mater? J Neuroimaging. 2023;33:58–66.
doi: 10.1111/jon.13062 pubmed: 36197323
Trocha G, Bonilla A, Romero C, Palacios J, Molano-Gonzalez N. Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in a healthy adult Colombian population. BMC Neurol. 2023;23:16.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03062-4 pmcid: 9837461 pubmed: 36639617
Rodríguez Aparicio EE, Carrizosa Gonzalez JA, Rodriguez Lima DR. Optic nerve sheath diameter at high altitude: standardized measures in healthy volunteers. Ultrasound J. 2022;14:46.
doi: 10.1186/s13089-022-00295-1 pmcid: 9674817 pubmed: 36401100
Wang L, Feng L, Yao Y, Deng F, Wang Y, Feng J, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter among healthy Chinese adults. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:683–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.020 pubmed: 26738627
Chen H, Ding GS, Zhao YC, Yu RG, Zhou JX. Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve diameter and optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy Chinese adults. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:106.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0361-x pmcid: 4493801 pubmed: 26148482
Kane SC, Dennis AT, Da Silva CF, Kornman LH, Cade TJ, Brennecke SP. Optic nerve sonography and ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in healthy pregnant women: an Australian cohort study. J Clin Ultrasound. 2019;47:531–9.
doi: 10.1002/jcu.22735 pubmed: 31087684
Omran AS, El Ansari T, Riad W. Effect of magnesium sulphate on the intracranial pressure of preeclampsia patients using ultrasound-guided optic nerve sheath diameter: a pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021;15:14–8.
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_887_20 pmcid: 8016057 pubmed: 33824637
Assu SM, Bhatia N, Jain K, Gainder S, Sikka P, Aditya AS. Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter following seizure prophylaxis in pre-eclamptic parturients with severe features: a prospective, observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40:2451–7.
doi: 10.1002/jum.15632 pubmed: 33448448
Rani K, Jain P, Bhogawar SD, Bhogawar RS, Prasad MK, Choudhary AK. Ultrasonographic changes in transorbital measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in magnesium sulfate-treated severely preeclamptic patients: a prospective observational study. Anesth Essays Res. 2022;16:366–72.
doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_117_22 pmcid: 9813994 pubmed: 36620100

Auteurs

Marina Félix da Mota (MF)

Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Melania Maria de Amorim (MM)

Reproductive Health From the World Health Organization (WHO), Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Mário Diego Teles Correia (MDT)

University of São Paulo (USP), Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Leila Katz (L)

Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. katzleila@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH