Safety and efficacy of up to 60 h of iv istaroxime in pre-cardiogenic shock patients: Design of the SEISMiC trial.

cardiac calcitrope cardiogenic shock central haemodynamics inotrope istaroxime pre‐cardiogenic shock

Journal

ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 10 09 2024
accepted: 13 09 2024
medline: 8 10 2024
pubmed: 8 10 2024
entrez: 8 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a challenge for clinicians. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and blood pressure are crucial to prevent further deterioration. Unfortunately, current inotropes, which act through adrenergic receptor stimulation, are associated with malignant arrhythmias and poorer outcomes. Due to its unique mechanism of action, istaroxime should improve haemodynamics without adrenergic overactivation. The SEISMiC study is designed to examine the safety and efficacy (haemodynamic effect) of istaroxime administrated in pre-CS patients. The SEISMiC study is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study with two parts (A and B). The study enrols patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (pre-CS, not related to myocardial ischaemia) with persistent hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) 70-100 mmHg for at least 2 h] and clinically confirmed congestion, NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL, and LVEF≤40%. Subjects must not have taken intravenous (iv) vasopressors, inotropes or digoxin in the past 6 h. Eligible patients are randomized to receive IV infusion of istaroxime (different doses and regimens in Parts A and B) or placebo for up to 60 h. Central haemodynamics, ECG Holter monitoring, cardiac ultrasound and biomarkers are recorded at predefined time points during the trial. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the SBP area under the curve from baseline curve from baseline to 6 and 24 h in the combined SEISMiC Parts A and B population. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include haemodynamic, laboratory and clinical measures in SEISMiC B alone in the combined SEISMiC A and B studies. The study results will contribute to our understanding of the role of istaroxime in pre-CS patients and potentially provide insight into the drug's haemodynamic effects and safety in this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39375885
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15102
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Windtree Therapeutics, Inc.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Références

van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;136:e232‐e268. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525
Singh T, Samson R, Ayinapudi K, Motwani A, Le Jemtel TH. Precardiogenic shock: a new clinical entity. Cardiol Rev 2019;27:198‐201. doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000000237
Chioncel O, Parissis J, Mebazaa A, Thiele H, Desch S, Bauersachs J, et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and contemporary management of cardiogenic shock—a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:1315‐1341. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1922
Bers DM. Altered cardiac myocyte Ca regulation in heart failure. Physiology (Bethesda) 2006;21:380‐387. doi:10.1152/physiol.00019.2006
Galván‐Román F, Fernández‐Herrero I, Ariza‐Solé A, Sánchez‐Salado JC, Puerto E, Lorente V, et al. Prognosis of cardiogenic shock secondary to culprit left main coronary artery lesion‐related myocardial infarction. ESC Heart Fail 2023;10:111‐120. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14128
Zymlinski R, Biegus J, Sokolski M, Nawrocka‐Millward S, Todd J, Jankowska EA, et al. Increased blood lactate is prevalent and identifies poor prognosis in patients with acute heart failure without overt peripheral hypoperfusion. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1011‐1018. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1156
Zymlinski R, Sokolski M, Biegus J, et al. Multi‐organ dysfunction/injury on admission identifies acute heart failure patients at high risk of poor outcome. Eur J Heart Fail 2019;21:744‐750. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1378
Beer BN, Jentzer JC, Weimann J, Dabboura S, Yan I, Sundermeyer J, et al. Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock irrespective of the underlying cause—the Cardiogenic Shock Score. Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:657‐667. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2449
Guihaire J, Dang VS. Epinephrine infusion during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for cardiogenic shock: simply inefficient or deleterious? ESC Heart Failure 2022;9:3663‐3663. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13826
Maack C, Eschenhagen T, Hamdani N, Heinzel FR, Lyon AR, Manstein DJ, et al. Treatments targeting inotropy. Eur Heart J 2019;40:3626‐3644. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy600
Lu X, Wang X, Gao Y, Walline JH, Yu S, Ge Z, et al. Norepinephrine use in cardiogenic shock patients is associated with increased 30 day mortality. ESC Heart Fail 2022;9:1875‐1883. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13893
Riccardi M, Pagnesi M, Chioncel O, Mebazaa A, Cotter G, Gustafsson F, et al. Medical therapy of cardiogenic shock: contemporary use of inotropes and vasopressors. Eur J Heart Fail 2024;26:411‐431. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3162
Psotka MA, Gottlieb SS, Francis GS, Allen LA, Teerlink JR, Adams KF Jr, et al. Cardiac calcitropes, myotropes, and mitotropes: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2345‐2353. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.051
Zhang J, Lee MY, Cavalli M, Chen L, Berra‐Romani R, Balke CW, et al. Sodium pump α2 subunits control myogenic tone and blood pressure in mice. J Physiol 2005;569:243‐256. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.091801
Chioncel O, Collins SP, Butler J. Istaroxime in acute heart failure: the holy grail is at HORIZON? Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:1694‐1697. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1843
Gheorghiade M, Blair JE, Filippatos GS, Macarie C, Ruzyllo W, Korewicki J, et al. Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and neurohormonal effects of istaroxime, a novel intravenous inotropic and lusitropic agent: a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2276‐2285. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.015
Carubelli V, Zhang Y, Metra M, Lombardi C, Felker GM, Filippatos G, et al. Treatment with 24 hour istaroxime infusion in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure: a randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:1684‐1693. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1743
Shah SJ, Blair JE, Filippatos GS, Macarie C, Ruzyllo W, Korewicki J, et al. Effects of istaroxime on diastolic stiffness in acute heart failure syndromes: results from the hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and neurohormonal effects of istaroxime, a novel intravenous inotropic and lusitropic agent: a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure (HORIZON‐HF) trial. Am Heart J 2009;157:1035‐1041. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.007
Farmakis D, Filippatos G. Istaroxime: is the remedy better than the disease? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2011;25:115‐117. doi:10.1007/s10557‐011‐6295‐7
Arrigo M, Price S, Baran DA, Pöss J, Aissaoui N, Bayes‐Genis A, et al. Optimising clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a statement from the 2020 Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:1192‐1202. doi:10.1016/S2213‐2600(21)00172‐7
Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, Burkhoff D, Hall SA, Henry TD, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;94:29‐37. doi:10.1002/ccd.28329
Bertaina M, Morici N, Frea S, Garatti L, Briani M, Sorini C, et al. Differences between cardiogenic shock related to acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. ESC Heart Fail 2023;10:3472‐3482. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14510
Metra M, Chioncel O, Cotter G, Davison B, Filippatos G, Mebazaa A, et al. Safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with acute heart failure‐related pre‐cardiogenic shock ‐ a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study (SEISMiC). Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:1967‐1977. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2629
Metra M, Chioncel O, Davison B, Filippatos G, Mebazaa A, Novosadova M, et al. Safety and efficacy of Iistaroxime 1.0 and 1.5 μg/kg/min for patients with pre‐cardiogenic shock. J Card Fail 2023;29:1097‐1103. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.020
Kawaguchi A, Koch GG. sanon: an R package for stratified analysis with nonparametric covariable adjustment. J Stat Softw 2015;67:1‐37. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i09
Kanwar MK, Billia F, Randhawa V, Cowger JA, Barnett CM, Chih S, et al. Heart failure related cardiogenic shock: an ISHLT consensus conference content summary. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024;43:189‐203. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.014
Biegus J, Zymlinski R, Gajewski P, Sokolski M, Siwołowski P, Sokolska J, et al. Persistent hyperlactataemia is related to high rates of in‐hospital adverse events and poor outcome in acute heart failure. Kardiol Pol 2019;77:355‐362. doi:10.5603/KP.a2019.0030
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, et al. Clinical presentation, shock severity and mortality in patients with de novo versus acute‐on‐chronic heart failure‐related cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2024;26:432‐444. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3082
Tomasoni D, Vishram‐Nielsen JKK, Pagnesi M, Adamo M, Lombardi CM, Gustafsson F, et al. Advanced heart failure: guideline‐directed medical therapy, diuretics, inotropes, and palliative care. ESC Heart Fail 2022;9:1507‐1523. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13859
Thiele H, Møller JE, Henriques JPS, Bogerd M, Seyfarth M, Burkhoff D, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct‐related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta‐analysis of randomised trials with 6‐month follow‐up. The Lancet 404:1019‐1028. doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(24)01448‐X
Montero S, Rivas‐Lasarte M, Huang F, Chommeloux J, Demondion P, Bréchot N, et al. Time course, factors related to, and prognostic impact of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane flow in cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail 2023;10:568‐577. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14132
Møller JE, Engstrøm T, Jensen LO, Eiskjær H, Mangner N, Polzin A, et al. Microaxial flow pump or standard care in infarct‐related cardiogenic shock. New Engl J Med 2024;390:1382‐1393. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2312572
van Dort DIM, Peij K, Manintveld OC, Hoeks SE, Morshuis WJ, van Royen N, et al. Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neth Heart J 2020;28:179‐189. doi:10.1007/s12471‐019‐01351‐7
Rodenas‐Alesina E, Luis Scolari F, Wang VN, Brahmbhatt DH, Mihajlovic V, Fung NL, et al. Improved mortality and haemodynamics with milrinone in cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2023;10:2577‐2587. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14379

Auteurs

Jan Biegus (J)

Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Alexander Mebazaa (A)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Saint-Louis and Lariboisière Hospitals, FHU PROMICE, DMU Parabol, APHP Nord, Paris, France.
Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), Université Paris Cité, Inserm UMR-S 942, Paris, France.

Marco Metra (M)

Cardiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Matteo Pagnesi (M)

Cardiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Ovidiu Chioncel (O)

Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu', Bucharest, Romania.
University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.

Beth Davison (B)

Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), Université Paris Cité, Inserm UMR-S 942, Paris, France.
Momentum Research Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Gerasimos Filippatos (G)

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece.

Agnieszka Tycińska (A)

Department of Intensive Cardiac Care, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.

Maria Novosadova (M)

Momentum Research Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Gaurav Gulati (G)

Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Marianela Barros (M)

Momentum Research Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Maria Luz Diaz (ML)

ECLA International, Rosario, Argentina.

Carlos Guardia (C)

Windtree Therapeutics Inc, Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA.

Robert Zymliński (R)

Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Piotr Gajewski (P)

Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Piotr Ponikowski (P)

Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Phillip Simmons (P)

Windtree Therapeutics Inc, Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA.

Steven Simonson (S)

Windtree Therapeutics Inc, Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA.

Gad Cotter (G)

Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), Université Paris Cité, Inserm UMR-S 942, Paris, France.
Momentum Research Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Classifications MeSH