Offspring may succeed well next to their relatives, but it needs particular traits.

Quercus germination in temperate forest Janzen-Connell and reversed Janzen-Connell effect biotic mosaic of selection herbivory and seed predation niche conservatism and niche shift traits

Journal

Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 06 07 2024
medline: 8 10 2024
pubmed: 8 10 2024
entrez: 8 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is ongoing debate about whether offspring perform best next to phylogenetically distantly related adult neighbours (due to the scarcity of enemies and competitors) or next to closely related adults (due to the abundance of mutualists). Here we hypothesise that relatedness of adult neighbours affects which traits confer performance rather than performance itself. We studied seed removal, seed germination and sapling growth in Sessile Oaks (Quercus petraea and hybrids), and how they depend on size, shape and other traits, under both closely and distantly related canopies, manipulating offspring-density, presence of insects, and fungi, and spatial proximity to oaks. We found that phylogenetic distance of adult neighbours affects only little performance of offspring but strongly which traits confer performance to offspring, in particular the size and shape of seeds and saplings. Differences in trait-performance relationships mostly disappear once insects or conspecific competitors are excluded (albeit exclusion of fungi reinforced these differences). Effects of phylogenetic distance of neighbours were not replaceable by the percentage of the gymnosperms among neighbours, nor the environmental conditions considered. We suggest that by responding to a biotic micro-mosaic of selection pressures, Sessile Oak flexibly succeeds in diverse neighbourhoods. Sessile Oak might maintain the potential for both, convergence with and divergence from phylogenetically distantly related species, thereby reinforcing or eroding phylogenetic signal of niches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
There is ongoing debate about whether offspring perform best next to phylogenetically distantly related adult neighbours (due to the scarcity of enemies and competitors) or next to closely related adults (due to the abundance of mutualists). Here we hypothesise that relatedness of adult neighbours affects which traits confer performance rather than performance itself.
METHODS METHODS
We studied seed removal, seed germination and sapling growth in Sessile Oaks (Quercus petraea and hybrids), and how they depend on size, shape and other traits, under both closely and distantly related canopies, manipulating offspring-density, presence of insects, and fungi, and spatial proximity to oaks.
KEY RESULTS RESULTS
We found that phylogenetic distance of adult neighbours affects only little performance of offspring but strongly which traits confer performance to offspring, in particular the size and shape of seeds and saplings. Differences in trait-performance relationships mostly disappear once insects or conspecific competitors are excluded (albeit exclusion of fungi reinforced these differences). Effects of phylogenetic distance of neighbours were not replaceable by the percentage of the gymnosperms among neighbours, nor the environmental conditions considered.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We suggest that by responding to a biotic micro-mosaic of selection pressures, Sessile Oak flexibly succeeds in diverse neighbourhoods. Sessile Oak might maintain the potential for both, convergence with and divergence from phylogenetically distantly related species, thereby reinforcing or eroding phylogenetic signal of niches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39377181
pii: 7815490
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae177
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Keliang Zhang (K)

College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Maud Deniau (M)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Vincent Jung (V)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Benoît Béchade (B)

Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.

Valérie Gousbet (V)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Margot Brunellière (M)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Benjamin Yguel (B)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Andreas Prinzing (A)

Research Unit "Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Evolution"; Université de Rennes 1/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Campus de Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14A, 35042 Rennes, France.

Classifications MeSH