CRISPR-Cas9: Unraveling Genetic Secrets to Enhance Floral and Fruit Traits in Tomato.
Architecture
Genome editing
Health
Inflorescence
Shelf life
Journal
Molecular biotechnology
ISSN: 1559-0305
Titre abrégé: Mol Biotechnol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9423533
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Oct 2024
08 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
08
2024
accepted:
17
09
2024
medline:
8
10
2024
pubmed:
8
10
2024
entrez:
8
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Tomato, a globally consumed vegetable, possesses vast genetic diversity, making it suitable for genetic manipulation using various genetic improvement techniques. Tomatoes are grown extensively for their market value and health benefits, primarily contributed by enhanced yield and nutritional value respectively, influenced by floral and fruit traits. Floral morphology is maintained by genes involved in meristem size control, regulation of inflorescence transition, and pollen development. SP (SELF-PRUNING) and SP5G (SELF-PRUNING 5G) determine growth habit and flowering time. RIN (RIPENING INHIBITOR) and PG (POLYGALACTURONASE) are responsible for the shelf life of fruits. In addition to this, nutrition-enriched tomatoes have been developed in recent times. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the major genes influencing floral morphology, flowering time, fruit size, fruit shape, shelf life, and nutritional value, ultimately resulting in enhanced yield. Additionally, we address the advances in CRISPR/Cas9 applied for the genetic improvement of tomatoes along with prospects of areas in which research development in terms of tomato genetic improvement has to be advanced.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39377911
doi: 10.1007/s12033-024-01290-8
pii: 10.1007/s12033-024-01290-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
FAO. Tomato land and water 2023 https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information/tomato
Ali, M. Y., Sina, A. A. I., Khandker, S. S., Neesa, L., Tanvir, E., Kabir, A., Khalil, M. I., & Gan, S. H. (2020). Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds in tomatoes and their impact on human health and disease: A review. Foods., 10(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010045
doi: 10.3390/foods10010045
pubmed: 33375293
pmcid: 7823427
Friedman, M. (2013). Anticarcinogenic, cardioprotective, and other health benefits of tomato compounds lycopene, α-tomatine, and tomatidine in pure form and in fresh and processed tomatoes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(40), 9534–9550. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402654e
doi: 10.1021/jf402654e
pubmed: 24079774
Borguini, R. G., da Silva, F., & Torres, E. A. (2009). Tomatoes and tomato products as dietary sources of antioxidants. Food Review International, 25(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559120903155859
doi: 10.1080/87559120903155859
Kumar, K. S., Paswan, S., & Srivastava, S. (2012). Tomato-a natural medicine and its health benefits. Journal of Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry., 1(1), 33–43.
Toor, R. K., & Savage, G. P. (2005). Antioxidant activity in different fractions of tomatoes. Food Research International, 38(5), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.10.016
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.10.016
Chaudhary, P., Sharma, A., Singh, B., & Nagpal, A. K. (2018). Bioactivities of phytochemicals present in tomato. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55, 2833–2849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3221-z
doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3221-z
pubmed: 30065393
pmcid: 6045986
Fiedor, J., & Burda, K. (2014). Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients, 6(2), 466–488. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6020466
doi: 10.3390/nu6020466
pubmed: 24473231
pmcid: 3942711
Tiwari, J. K., Rai, N., Singh, M. K., Mishra, L. K., Mishra, G., & Behera, T. (2023). Characterization of tomato lines for yield components, processing traits and disease resistance based on phenotype and molecular markers. Vegetable Science, 50(2), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2023.v50.i2.06
doi: 10.61180/vegsci.2023.v50.i2.06
Razifard, H., Ramos, A., Della Valle, A. L., Bodary, C., Goetz, E., Manser, E. J., Li, X., Zhang, L., Visa, S., Tieman, D., van der Knaap, E., & Caicedo, A. L. (2020). Genomic evidence for complex domestication history of the cultivated tomato in Latin America. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37(4), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz297
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz297
pubmed: 31912142
pmcid: 7086179
Bauchet, G., & Causse, M. (2012). Genetic diversity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its wild relatives. Genetic diversity in plants, 8, 134–162. https://doi.org/10.5772/33073
doi: 10.5772/33073
Di Matteo, A., Rigano, M. M., Sacco, A., Frusciante, L., & Barone, A. (2011). Genetic transformation in tomato: Novel tools to improve fruit quality and pharmaceutical production. Genetic transformation. https://doi.org/10.5772/24521
doi: 10.5772/24521
Sacco, A., Greco, B., Di Matteo, A., De Stefano, R., & Barone, A. (2013). Evaluation of tomato genetic resources for response to water deficit. American Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.4.12A3016
doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.4.12A3016
Saito, T., Ariizumi, T., Okabe, Y., Asamizu, E., Hiwasa-Tanase, K., Fukuda, N., et al. (2011). TOMATOMA: A novel tomato mutant database distributing Micro-Tom mutant collections. Plant and Cell Physiology., 52(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr004
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr004
pubmed: 21258066
pmcid: 3037083
Pnueli, L., Gutfinger, T., Hareven, D., Ben-Naim, O., Ron, N., Adir, N., et al. (2001). Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. The Plant Cell, 13(12), 2687–2702. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010293
doi: 10.1105/tpc.010293
pubmed: 11752381
pmcid: 139482
Soyk, S., Müller, N. A., Park, S. J., Schmalenbach, I., Jiang, K., Hayama, R., et al. (2017). Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato. Nature Genetics, 49(1), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3733
doi: 10.1038/ng.3733
pubmed: 27918538
Li, J., Scarano, A., Gonzalez, N. M., D’Orso, F., Yue, Y., Nemeth, K., et al. (2022). Biofortified tomatoes provide a new route to vitamin D sufficiency. Nature Plants, 8(6), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01154-6
doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01154-6
pubmed: 35606499
pmcid: 9213236
Lawal, O., Ayodele, A., & Chukwuka, K. (2007). Morphological studies in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill lines in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(5), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2007.737.744
doi: 10.3923/jbs.2007.737.744
Sharma, P., Thakur, S., & Negi, R. (2019). Recent advances in breeding of tomato–a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.151
doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.151
Begna, T. (2021). Conventional breeding methods widely used to improve self-pollinated crops. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0701001
doi: 10.20431/2454-6224.0701001
Lamichhane, S., & Thapa, S. (2022). Advances from conventional to modern plant breeding methodologies. Plant Breed. Biotech., 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2022.10.1.1
doi: 10.9787/PBB.2022.10.1.1
Shahwar, D., Ahn, N., Kim, D., Ahn, W., & Park, Y. (2023). Mutagenesis-based Plant Breeding Approaches and Genome Engineering: A Review Focused on Tomato. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108473
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108473
pubmed: 37716439
Hasan, N., Choudhary, S., Naaz, N., Sharma, N., & Laskar, R. A. (2021). Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 19(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00231-1
doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00231-1
Zhang, Y., Massel, K., Godwin, I. D., & Gao, C. (2018). Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biology, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y
Shamshirgaran, Y., Liu, J., Sumer, H., Verma, P. J., & Taheri-Ghahfarokhi, A. (2022). Tools for efficient genome editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR. Applications of genome modulation and editing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2301-5_2
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2301-5_2
Nussenzweig, P. M., & Marraffini, L. A. (2020). Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas immunity in bacteria. Annual Review of Genetics, 54, 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-022120-112523
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-022120-112523
pubmed: 32857635
Rehman, F., Gong, H., Bao, Y., Zeng, S., Huang, H., & Wang, Y. (2022). CRISPR gene editing of major domestication traits accelerating breeding for Solanaceae crops improvement. Plant Molecular Biology, 108(3), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01229-6
doi: 10.1007/s11103-021-01229-6
pubmed: 35032250
Tyumentseva, M., Tyumentsev, A., & Akimkin, V. (2023). CRISPR/Cas9 landscape: Current state and future perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(22), 16077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216077
doi: 10.3390/ijms242216077
pubmed: 38003266
pmcid: 10671331
Park, S. J., Jiang, K., Schatz, M. C., & Lippman, Z. B. (2012). Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(2), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114963109
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114963109
Xu, C., Liberatore, K. L., MacAlister, C. A., Huang, Z., Chu, Y.-H., Jiang, K., Brooks, C., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M., Xiong, G., Pauly, M., Van Eck, J., Matsubayashi, Y., van der Knaap, E., & Lippman, Z. B. (2015). A cascade of arabinosyltransferases controls shoot meristem size in tomato. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3309
doi: 10.1038/ng.3309
pubmed: 26005869
Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tian, L., Miao, Y., Hou, L., Sun, M., Qi, M., & Li, T. (2023). Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Downstream Genes of CLAVATA3 in Tomato. Horticulturae, 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010011
doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10010011
Yang, Y., Yang, H., Tan, Y., Zhao, T., Xu, X., Li, J., & Jiang, J. (2021). Comparative Genome Analysis of Genes Regulating Compound Inflorescences in Tomato. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(22), 12548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212548
doi: 10.3390/ijms222212548
pubmed: 34830429
pmcid: 8623504
Guo, X., Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Qiao, J., Zhang, Y., Shen, H., & Hu, Z. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of SlCMT4 causes changes in plant architecture and reproductive organs in tomato. Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac081
doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac081
pubmed: 36793754
pmcid: 9926158
Zhang, Y., Zhang, B., Yang, T., Zhang, J., Liu, B., Zhan, X., & Liang, Y. (2020). The GAMYB-like gene SlMYB33 mediates flowering and pollen development in tomato. Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-00366-1
doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00366-1
pubmed: 33372175
pmcid: 7769993
Guo, X., Hu, Z., Yin, W., Yu, X., Zhu, Z., Zhang, J., & Chen, G. (2016). The tomato floral homeotic protein FBP1-like gene, SlGLO1, plays key roles in petal and stamen development. Science and Reports, 6(1), 20454. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20454
doi: 10.1038/srep20454
Wu, M., Zhang, Q., Wu, G., Zhang, L., Xu, X., Hu, X., Gong, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Li, H., & Deng, W. (2023). SlMYB72 affects pollen development by regulating autophagy in tomato. Horticulture. Research., 10(3), p286. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac286
doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac286
Wang, X., Liu, Z., Sun, S., Wu, J., Li, R., Wang, H., & Cui, X. (2021). SISTER OF TM3 activates FRUITFULL1 to regulate inflorescence branching in tomato. Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00677-x
doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00677-x
pubmed: 34923572
pmcid: 8684551
Lin, W., Gupta, S. K., Arazi, T., & Spitzer-Rimon, B. (2021). MIR172d is required for floral organ identity and number in tomato. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9), 4659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094659
doi: 10.3390/ijms22094659
pubmed: 33925088
pmcid: 8124722
Xu, C., Park, S. J., Van Eck, J., & Lippman, Z. B. (2016). Control of inflorescence architecture in tomato by BTB/POZ transcriptional regulators. Genes & Development, 30(18), 2048–2061. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.288415.116
doi: 10.1101/gad.288415.116
Shang, L., Tao, J., Song, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Ge, P., Li, F., Dong, H., Gai, W., Grierson, D., Ye, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutations of FANTASTIC FOUR gene family for creating early flowering mutants in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14223
doi: 10.1111/pbi.14223
pubmed: 37942846
pmcid: 10893942
Cao, K., Cui, L., Zhou, X., Ye, L., Zou, Z., & Deng, S. (2016). Four tomato FLOWERING LOCUS T-like proteins act antagonistically to regulate floral initiation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01213
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01213
pubmed: 26793202
pmcid: 4707262
Carmel-Goren, L., Liu, Y. S., Lifschitz, E., & Zamir, D. (2003). The SELF-PRUNING gene family in tomato. Plant Molecular Biology, 52, 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLAN.0000004333.96451.11
doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000004333.96451.11
pubmed: 14682620
Pnueli, L., Carmel-Goren, L., Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Alvarez, J., Ganal, M., Zamir, D., & Lifschitz, E. (1998). The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development, 125(11), 1979–1989. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.11.1979
doi: 10.1242/dev.125.11.1979
pubmed: 9570763
Jiang, X., Lubini, G., Hernandes-Lopes, J., Rijnsburger, K., Veltkamp, V., de Maagd, R. A., Angenent, G. C., & Bemer, M. (2022). FRUITFULL-like genes regulate flowering time and inflorescence architecture in tomato. The Plant Cell, 34(3), 1002–1019. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab298
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab298
pubmed: 34893888
Grandillo, S., Ku, H., & Tanksley, S. (1999). Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics., 99, 978–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051405
doi: 10.1007/s001220051405
Van der Knaap, E., Chakrabarti, M., Chu, Y. H., Clevenger, J. P., Illa-Berenguer, E., Huang, Z., Keyhaninejad, N., Mu, Q., Sun, L., Wang, Y., & Wu, S. (2014). What lies beyond the eye: The molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00227
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00227
pubmed: 24904622
pmcid: 4034497
Guo, M., Rupe, M. A., Dieter, J. A., Zou, J., Spielbauer, D., Duncan, K. E., Howard, R. J., Hou, Z., & Simmons, C. R. (2010). Cell Number Regulator1 affects plant and organ size in maize: Implications for crop yield enhancement and heterosis. The Plant Cell, 22(4), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.073676
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.073676
pubmed: 20400678
pmcid: 2879740
Chakrabarti, M., Zhang, N., Sauvage, C., Muños, S., Blanca, J., Cañizares, J., Diez, M. J., Schneider, R., Mazourek, M., McClead, M. C., & van der Knaap, E. (2013). A cytochrome P450 regulates a domestication trait in cultivated tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(42), 17125–17130. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307313110
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307313110
Huang, Z., & van der Knaap, E. (2011). Tomato fruit weight 11.3 maps close to fasciated on the bottom of chromosome 11. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 123, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1599-3
doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1599-3
pubmed: 21541852
Ning, Y., Wei, K., Li, S., Zhang, L., Chen, Z., Lu, F., Yang, P., Yang, M., Liu, X., Liu, X., Wang, X., Cao, X., Wang, X., Guo, Y., Liu, L., Li, X., Du, Y., Li, J., & Huang, Z. (2023). Fine mapping of fw6. 3, a major-effect quantitative trait locus that controls fruit weight in tomato. Plants, 12(11), 2065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112065
doi: 10.3390/plants12112065
pubmed: 37299049
pmcid: 10255850
Rodríguez, G. R., Muños, S., Anderson, C., Sim, S.-C., Michel, A., Causse, M., McSpadden Gardener, B. B., Francis, D., & van der Knaap, E. (2011). Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in the tomato germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiology, 156(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.167577
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167577
pubmed: 21441384
pmcid: 3091046
Xiao, H., Jiang, N., Schaffner, E., Stockinger, E. J., & van der Knaap, E. (2008). A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science, 319(5869), 1527–1530. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115304
doi: 10.1126/science.115304
pubmed: 18339939
Cong, B., Barrero, L. S., & Tanksley, S. D. (2008). Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nature Genetics, 40(6), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.144
doi: 10.1038/ng.144
pubmed: 18469814
Zhu, Q., Deng, L., Chen, J., Rodríguez, G. R., Sun, C., Chang, Z., Yang, T., Zhai, H., Jiang, H., Topcu, Y., Francis, D., Hutton, S., Sun, L., Li, C. B., van der Knaap, E., & Li, C. (2023). Redesigning the tomato fruit shape for mechanized production. Nature Plants, 9(10), 1659–1674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01522-w
doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01522-w
pubmed: 37723204
Vrebalov, J., Pan, I. L., Arroyo, A. J. M., McQuinn, R., Chung, M., Poole, M., Rose, J., Seyour, G., Grandillo, S., Giovannoni, J., & Irish, V. F. (2009). Fleshy fruit expansion and ripening are regulated by the tomato SHATTERPROOF gene TAGL1. The Plant Cell, 21(10), 3041–3062. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.066936
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.066936
pubmed: 19880793
pmcid: 2782289
Ito, Y., Sekiyama, Y., Nakayama, H., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., Shima, Y., Nakamura, N., Kotake-Nara, E., Kawasaki, S., Hirose, S., & Toki, S. (2020). Allelic mutations in the ripening-inhibitor locus generate extensive variation in tomato ripening. Plant Physiology, 183(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.20.00020
doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00020
pubmed: 32094307
pmcid: 7210617
Li, S., Xu, H., Ju, Z., Cao, D., Zhu, H., Fu, D., Grierson, D., Qin, G., Luo, Y., & Zhu, B. (2018). The RIN-MC fusion of MADS-box transcription factors has transcriptional activity and modulates expression of many ripening genes. Plant Physiology, 176(1), 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01449
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01449
pubmed: 29133374
Yang, Y., Zhu, G., Li, R., Yan, S., Fu, D., Zhu, B., Tian, H., Luo, Y., & Zhu, H. (2017). The RNA editing factor SlORRM4 is required for normal fruit ripening in tomato. Plant Physiology, 175(4), 1690–1702. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01265
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01265
pubmed: 29061908
pmcid: 5717740
Chen, Y., Hu, G., Rodriguez, C., Liu, M., Binder, B. M., & Chervin, C. (2020). Roles of SlETR7, a newly discovered ethylene receptor, in tomato plant and fruit development. Journal Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-0239-y
doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0239-y
pubmed: 33372175
Yang, L., Huang, W., Xiong, F., Xian, Z., Su, D., Ren, M., & Li, Z. (2017). Silencing of SlPL, which encodes a pectate lyase in tomato, confers enhanced fruit firmness, prolonged shelf-life and reduced susceptibility to grey mould. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(12), 1544–1555. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12737
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12737
pubmed: 28371176
pmcid: 5698048
Wang, D., Lu, Q., Wang, X., Ling, H., & Huang, N. (2023). Elucidating the role of SlXTH5 in tomato fruit softening. Horticulture Plant Journal, 9(4), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2022.12.005
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2022.12.005
Li, R., Sun, S., Wang, H., Wang, K., Yu, H., Zhou, Z., Xin, P., Chu, J., Zhao, T., Wang, H., Li, J., & Cui, X. (2020). FIS1 encodes a GA2-oxidase that regulates fruit firmness in tomato. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19705-w
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19705-w
pubmed: 33203832
pmcid: 7673020
Nie, H., Shi, Y., Geng, X., & Xing, G. (2022). CRISRP/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of tomato polygalacturonase gene (SlPG) delays fruit softening. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 729128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.729128
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.729128
pubmed: 35665160
pmcid: 9162796
De Jong, M., Wolters-Arts, M., Feron, R., Mariani, C., & Vriezen, W. H. (2009). The Solanum lycopersicum auxin response factor 7 (SlARF7) regulates auxin signaling during tomato fruit set and development. The Plant Journal, 57(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03671.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03671.x
pubmed: 18778404
Mounet, F., Moing, A., Kowalczyk, M., Rohrmann, J., Petit, J., Garcia, V., Maucourt, M., Yano, K., Deborde, C., Aoki, K., Berges, H., Granell, A., Fernie, A. R., Bellini, C., Rothan, C., & Lemaire-Chamley, M. (2012). Down-regulation of a single auxin efflux transport protein in tomato induces precocious fruit development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(13), 4901–4917. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers167
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers167
pubmed: 22844095
pmcid: 3427993
Ren, Z., Li, Z., Miao, Q., Yang, Y., Deng, W., & Hao, Y. (2011). The auxin receptor homologue in Solanum lycopersicum stimulates tomato fruit set and leaf morphogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(8), 2815–2826. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq455
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq455
pubmed: 21266497
Martí, C., Orzáez, D., Ellul, P., Moreno, V., Carbonell, J., & Granell, A. (2007). Silencing of DELLA induces facultative parthenocarpy in tomato fruits. The Plant Journal, 52(5), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03282.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03282.x
pubmed: 17883372
Tomlinson, L., Yang, Y., Emenecker, R., Smoker, M., Taylor, J., Perkins, S., Smith, J., MacLean, D., Olszewski, N. E., & Jones, J. D. G. (2019). Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in tomato to create a gibberellin-responsive dominant dwarf DELLA allele. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(1), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12952
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12952
pubmed: 29797460
Su, L., Bassa, C., Audran, C., Mila, I., Cheniclet, C., Chevalier, C., Bouzayen, M., Roustan, J. P., & Chervin, C. (2014). The auxin Sl-IAA17 transcriptional repressor controls fruit size via the regulation of endoreduplication-related cell expansion. Plant and Cell Physiology, 55(11), 1969–1976. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu124
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu124
pubmed: 25231966
Klap, C., Yeshayahou, E., Bolger, A. M., Arazi, T., Gupta, S. K., Shabtai, S., Usadel, B., Salts, Y., & Barg, R. (2017). Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from Sl AGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function. Plant Biotechnology Journal., 15(5), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12662
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12662
pubmed: 27862876
Ueta, R., Abe, C., Watanabe, T., Sugano, S. S., Ishihara, R., Ezura, H., Osakabe, Y., & Osakabe, K. (2017). Rapid breeding of parthenocarpic tomato plants using CRISPR/Cas9. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00501-4
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00501-4
pubmed: 28360425
pmcid: 5428692
Filler Hayut, S., MelamedBessudo, C., & Levy, A. A. (2017). Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15605. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15605
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15605
pubmed: 28548094
pmcid: 5458649
Yang, T., Ali, M., Lin, L., Li, P., He, H., Zhu, Q., et al. (2023). Recoloring tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex gene editing. Horticulture Research, 10(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac214
doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac214
Čermák, T., Baltes, N. J., Čegan, R., Zhang, Y., & Voytas, D. F. (2015). High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biology., 16, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9
Menconi, J., Perata, P., & Gonzali, S. (2024). In pursuit of purple: Anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits of the tomato clade. Trends in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.010
pubmed: 38177013
Zsögön, A., Čermák, T., Naves, E. R., Notini, M. M., Edel, K. H., Weinl, S., Freschi, l, Voytas, D. F., Kudla, J., & Pereira, L. E. (2018). De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nature Biotechnology, 36(12), 1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4272
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4272
Nonaka, S., Arai, C., Takayama, M., Matsukura, C., & Ezura, H. (2017). Efficient increase of ɣ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 7057. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06400-y
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06400-y
pubmed: 28765632
pmcid: 5539196
Do, J. H., Park, S. Y., Park, S. H., Kim, H. M., Ma, S. H., Mai, T. D., Shim, J. S., & Joung, Y. H. (2022). Development of a genome-edited tomato with high ascorbate content during later stage of fruit ripening through mutation of SlAPX4. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 836916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836916
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.836916
pubmed: 35498670
pmcid: 9039661
Chaudhuri, A., Halder, K., & Datta, A. (2022). Classification of CRISPR/Cas system and its application in tomato breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 135(2), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03984-y
doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03984-y
pubmed: 34973111
Hu, N., Xian, Z., Li, N., Liu, Y., Huang, W., Yan, F., Su, D., Chen, J., & Li, Z. (2019). Rapid and user-friendly open-source CRISPR/Cas9 system for single- or multi-site editing of tomato genome. Horticulture Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0082-6
doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0082-6
pubmed: 31754435
pmcid: 6861294
Li, R., Li, R., Li, X., Fu, D., Zhu, B., Tian, H., Luo, Y., & Zhu, H. (2018). Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated metabolic engineering of γ-aminobutyric acid levels in Solanum lycopersicum. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 16(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12781
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12781
pubmed: 28640983
Yang, T.-x, Deng, L., Zhao, W., Zhang, R., Jiang, H.-l, Ye, Z., Li, C. B., & Li, C. (2019). Rapid breeding of pink-fruited tomato hybrids using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 46(10), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2019.10.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2019.10.002
pubmed: 31734133
Fernandez-Moreno, J.-P., Tzfadia, O., Forment, J., Presa, S., Rogachev, I., Meir, S., Orzaez, D., Aharoni, A., & Granell, A. (2016). Characterization of a new pink-fruited tomato mutant results in the identification of a null allele of the SlMYB12 transcription factor. Plant Physiology, 171(3), 1821–1836. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00282
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00282
pubmed: 27208285
pmcid: 4936558
Larriba, E., Yaroshko, O., & Pérez-Pérez, J. M. (2024). Recent advances in tomato gene editing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(5), 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052606
doi: 10.3390/ijms25052606
pubmed: 38473859
pmcid: 10932025
Sretenovic, S., Liu, S., Li, G., Cheng, Y., Fan, T., Xu, Y., Zhou, J., Zheng, X., Coleman, G., Zhang, Y., & Qi, Y. (2021). Exploring C-To-G base editing in rice, tomato, and poplar. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 3, 756766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2021.756766
doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.756766
pubmed: 34713268
pmcid: 8525388
Lin, C.-S., Hsu, C.-T., Yuan, Y.-H., Zheng, P.-X., Wu, F.-H., Cheng, Q.-W., Wu, Y.-L., Wu, T.-L., Lin, S., Yue, J.-J., Cheng, Y.-H., Lin, S.-I., Shih, M.-C., Sheen, J., & Lin, Y.-C. (2022). DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing of wild tetraploid tomato Solanum peruvianum using protoplast regeneration. Plant Physiology, 188(4), 1917–1930. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac022
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac022
pubmed: 35088855
pmcid: 8968427
Liu, Y., Andersson, M., Granell, A., Cardi, T., Hofvander, P., & Nicolia, A. (2022). Establishment of a DNA-free genome editing and protoplast regeneration method in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant Cell Reports, 41(9), 1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-022-02893-8
doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02893-8
pubmed: 35773498
pmcid: 9395478
Shimatani, Z., Kashojiya, S., Takayama, M., Terada, R., Arazoe, T., Ishii, H., Teramura, H., Yamamoto, T., Komatsu, H., Miura, K., Ezura, H., Nishida, K., Ariizumi, T., & Kondo, A. (2017). Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nature Biotechnology, 35(5), 441–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3833
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3833
pubmed: 28346401
Kawaguchi, K., Takei-Hoshi, R., Yoshikawa, I., Nishida, K., Kobayashi, M., Kusano, M., Lu, Y., Ariizumi, T., Ezura, H., Otagaki, S., Matsumoto, S., & Shiratake, K. (2021). Functional disruption of cell wall invertase inhibitor by genome editing increases sugar content of tomato fruit without decrease fruit weight. Science and Reports, 11(1), 21534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00966-4
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00966-4
Hunziker, J., Nishida, K., Kondo, A., Ariizumi, T., & Ezura, H. (2022). Phenotypic characterization of high carotenoid tomato mutants generated by the target-AID base-editing technology. Frontiers in Plant Science., 13, 848560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.848560
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.848560
pubmed: 35874006
pmcid: 9301137
He, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Technological breakthroughs in generating transgene-free and genetically stable CRISPR-edited plants. Abiotechnology, 1(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42994-019-00013-x
doi: 10.1007/s42994-019-00013-x
Lin, C. S., Hsu, C. T., Yang, L. H., Lee, L. Y., Fu, J. Y., Cheng, Q. W., Wu, F. H., Hsiao, H. C. W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., Chang, W. J., Yu, C. T., Wang, W., Liao, L. J., Gelvin, S. B., & Shih, M. C. (2018). Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: From single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 16(7), 1295–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12870
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12870
pubmed: 29230929
pmcid: 5999315
Wang, P., Zhao, F.-J., & Kopittke, P. M. (2019). Engineering crops without genome integration using nanotechnology. Trends in Plant Science, 24(7), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.05.004
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.05.004
pubmed: 31155336
Yubing, H., Min, Z., Lihao, W., Junhua, W., Qiaoyan, W., Rongchen, W., & Yunde, Z. (2019). Improvements of TKC technology accelerate isolation of transgene-free CRISPR/Cas9-edited rice plants. Rice Science, 26(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.11.001
Pan, C., Ye, L., Qin, L., Liu, X., He, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., & Lu, G. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 24765. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24765
doi: 10.1038/srep24765
pubmed: 27097775
pmcid: 4838866
Xia, X., Cheng, X., Li, R., Yao, J., Li, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134(9), 2727–2747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03874-3
doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03874-3
pubmed: 34076729
Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., Mgonigle, L. K., Missirian, A., Qaim, M., Sargent, R. D., Souza-Rodrigues, E., & Kremen, C. (2024). Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops. Science, 385(6712), 9340. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado9340
doi: 10.1126/science.ado9340
Rissler, J., & Mellon, M. G. (1996). The ecological risks of engineered crops. MIT Press.
Chandrasekaran, M., Boopathi, T., & Paramasivan, M. (2021). A status-quo review on CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing applications in tomato. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 190, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.169
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.169
pubmed: 34474054
Waltz, E. (2022). GABA-enriched tomato is first CRISPR-edited food to enter market. Nature Biotechnology, 40(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41587-021-00026-2
doi: 10.1038/d41587-021-00026-2
pubmed: 34907351
Li, T., Yang, X., Yu, Y., Si, X., Zhai, X., Zhang, H., Dong, H., Dong, W., Gao, C., & Xu, C. (2018). Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nature Biotechnology, 36(12), 1160–1163. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4273
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4273
Rodríguez-Leal, D., Lemmon, Z. H., Man, J., Bartlett, M. E., & Lippman, Z. B. (2017). Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell, 171(2), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030
pubmed: 28919077
Ito, Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., Mikami, M., Shima, Y., Nakamura, N., Kotake-Nara, E., Kawasaki, S., & Toki, S. (2017). Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nature Plants, 3(11), 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0041-5
doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0041-5
pubmed: 29085071
Ito, Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., Mikami, M., & Toki, S. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 467(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117
pubmed: 26408904
Yu, Q.-h, Wang, B., Li, N., Tang, Y., Yang, S., Yang, T., Xu, J., Guo, C., Yan, P., Wang, Q., & Asmutola, P. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf life tomato lines. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 11874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1
pubmed: 28928381
pmcid: 5605656
Nguyen, C. C., Van Vu, T., Shelake, R. M., Nguyen, N. T., Khanh, T. D., Kim, W.-Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2024). Generation of parthenocarpic tomato plants in multiple elite cultivars using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Molecular Breeding, 44(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-024-01452-1
doi: 10.1007/s11032-024-01452-1
pubmed: 38317771