Clinical evaluation of a novel therapeutic single-use gastroscope: a pilot feasibility study.


Journal

Endoscopy
ISSN: 1438-8812
Titre abrégé: Endoscopy
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0215166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 10 2024
pubmed: 9 10 2024
entrez: 8 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The trend toward disposable products in gastrointestinal endoscopy, including single-use endoscopes, remains undeterred, even though crucial questions of sustainability and performance have not been sufficiently studied. The first therapeutic single-use gastroscope (Ambu aScope Gastro Large) was recently approved in Europe, but clinical data to support its use is currently unavailable. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Ambu aScope Gastro Large in routine procedures requiring a large working channel. Between January and May 2024, consecutive patients with an indication for therapeutic gastroscope use were included prospectively. The primary aim was to assess the intraprocedural technical success rate. Eight gastrointestinal bleedings, two pancreatic necrosectomies, four foreign body removals, four stent implantations, and two cryoablations were performed. The technical success rate was achieved in 16 out of 19 (84%) patients. Three crossovers to standard endoscopes occurred. Clinical success was achieved in all cases where the primary aim was achieved (85%). No adverse events were reported. The therapeutic single-use gastroscope demonstrated feasibility in various therapeutic procedures, however, a crossover rate of 16% and an average user quality assessment score of 3.2 on the Likert scale suggest that further technical improvements of the device are necessary.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS OBJECTIVE
The trend toward disposable products in gastrointestinal endoscopy, including single-use endoscopes, remains undeterred, even though crucial questions of sustainability and performance have not been sufficiently studied. The first therapeutic single-use gastroscope (Ambu aScope Gastro Large) was recently approved in Europe, but clinical data to support its use is currently unavailable. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Ambu aScope Gastro Large in routine procedures requiring a large working channel.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Between January and May 2024, consecutive patients with an indication for therapeutic gastroscope use were included prospectively. The primary aim was to assess the intraprocedural technical success rate.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight gastrointestinal bleedings, two pancreatic necrosectomies, four foreign body removals, four stent implantations, and two cryoablations were performed. The technical success rate was achieved in 16 out of 19 (84%) patients. Three crossovers to standard endoscopes occurred. Clinical success was achieved in all cases where the primary aim was achieved (85%). No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The therapeutic single-use gastroscope demonstrated feasibility in various therapeutic procedures, however, a crossover rate of 16% and an average user quality assessment score of 3.2 on the Likert scale suggest that further technical improvements of the device are necessary.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39379048
doi: 10.1055/a-2436-7933
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The single-use therapeutic gastroscopes used in this study were funded by the ambu GmbH. The study design, execution and manuscript preparation were carried out without any influence from the company. CR reports consulting fees from ambu Innovations and ambu GmbH, unpaid consultancies for Boston Scientific HM reports relationships with the following endoscopic companies: Ambu, Boston Scientific, Fujifilm, Hitachi, Olympus, has received honoraria from Olympus; has received consultation fees from ambu, Boston Scientific, Olympus. AE reports consulting fees from ambu and Olympus. The remaining authors and participating endoscopists declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Christoph Römmele (C)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Mousa Ayoub (M)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Julia Wanzl (J)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Vidan Tadic (V)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Georg Braun (G)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Tobias Weber (T)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Markus Wolfgang Scheppach (MW)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

David Roser (D)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Katharina Matic (K)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Sandra Nagl (S)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Helmut Messmann (H)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Alanna Ebigbo (A)

Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH