Patient-reported treatment satisfaction in essential tremor: levels of satisfaction and predictors of satisfaction.

clinical essential tremor medication survey treatment

Journal

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders
ISSN: 1756-2856
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101480242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 26 04 2024
accepted: 03 07 2024
medline: 9 10 2024
pubmed: 9 10 2024
entrez: 9 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although managing symptoms is paramount for both essential tremor (ET) patients and their healthcare providers, studies of treatment satisfaction are surprisingly lacking. We evaluated the satisfaction of patients who used a range of treatments and assessed the relation of a wide array of factors to satisfaction. One hundred four ET participants (age = 74.5 ± 10.2 years) completed a battery of self-report items. These included demographic information, measures of tremor and clinical history, psychological state, current ET treatment, and a series of questions about satisfaction with treatment. Analyses of responses to the four current treatment satisfaction questions revealed that the proportion of participants who were satisfied ranged from 35.0% to 57.3% (i.e., approximately 1/3 to 1/2); conversely, the proportion who were dissatisfied ranged from 9.2% to 37.0%. The remainder were neutral. Higher satisfaction levels were observed in participants who were included in treatment selection and who had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery, Between 1/3 and 1/2 of patients were satisfied with their treatment, whereas up to 1/3 were dissatisfied. In this initial exploration of correlates of treatment satisfaction in ET patients, we identified a number of associations between satisfaction and clinical, psychological and treatment variables. Additional research is warranted to further explore the nature of these relations over time.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although managing symptoms is paramount for both essential tremor (ET) patients and their healthcare providers, studies of treatment satisfaction are surprisingly lacking.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
We evaluated the satisfaction of patients who used a range of treatments and assessed the relation of a wide array of factors to satisfaction.
Methods UNASSIGNED
One hundred four ET participants (age = 74.5 ± 10.2 years) completed a battery of self-report items. These included demographic information, measures of tremor and clinical history, psychological state, current ET treatment, and a series of questions about satisfaction with treatment.
Results UNASSIGNED
Analyses of responses to the four current treatment satisfaction questions revealed that the proportion of participants who were satisfied ranged from 35.0% to 57.3% (i.e., approximately 1/3 to 1/2); conversely, the proportion who were dissatisfied ranged from 9.2% to 37.0%. The remainder were neutral. Higher satisfaction levels were observed in participants who were included in treatment selection and who had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery,
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Between 1/3 and 1/2 of patients were satisfied with their treatment, whereas up to 1/3 were dissatisfied. In this initial exploration of correlates of treatment satisfaction in ET patients, we identified a number of associations between satisfaction and clinical, psychological and treatment variables. Additional research is warranted to further explore the nature of these relations over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39380787
doi: 10.1177/17562864241271994
pii: 10.1177_17562864241271994
pmc: PMC11459580
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

17562864241271994

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2024.

Auteurs

Anjali Varghese (A)

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Diane S Berry (DS)

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Ali Ghanem (A)

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Nora C Hernandez (NC)

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Elan D Louis (ED)

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH