Predicting response to intravesical BCG in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer using an artificial intelligence-powered pathology assay: development and validation in an international 12 center cohort.

Artificial intelligence Bladder cancer Progression Recurrence

Journal

The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 10 2024
pubmed: 9 10 2024
entrez: 9 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There are few markers to identify those likely to recur or progress after treatment with intravesical BCG. We developed and validated artificial intelligence-based histologic assays that extract interpretable features from transurethral resection of bladder tumor digitized pathology images to predict risk of recurrence, progression, development of BCG unresponsive disease, and cystectomy. Pre-BCG resection-derived whole-slide images and clinical data were obtained for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer cases treated with BCG from 12 centers and were analyzed through a segmentation and feature extraction pipeline. Features associated with clinical outcomes were defined and tested on independent development and validation cohorts. Cases were classified into high or low risk for recurrence, progression, BCG unresponsive disease, and cystectomy. 944 cases (development:303, validation:641, median follow-up:36 months) representative of the intended use population were included (high-grade Ta:34.1%, high-grade T1:54.8%; carcinoma-in-situ only:11.1%, any carcinoma-in-situ:31.4%). In the validation cohort, "High recurrence risk" cases had inferior high-grade recurrence-free survival versus "Low recurrence risk" cases (HR 2.08, p<0.0001). "High progression risk" patients had poorer progression-free survival (HR 3.87, p<0.001) and higher risk of cystectomy (HR 3.35, p<0.001) than "Low progression risk". Cases harboring the BCG unresponsive disease signature had a shorter time to development of BCG unresponsive disease than cases without the signature (HR 2.31, p<0.0001). AI assays provided predictive information beyond clinicopathologic factors. We developed and validated AI-based histologic assays that identify high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer cases at higher risk of recurrence, progression, BCG unresponsive disease, and cystectomy, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39383345
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004278
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101097JU0000000000004278

Auteurs

Yair Lotan (Y)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Viswesh Krishna (V)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Waleed M Abuzeid (WM)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Bryn Launer (B)

Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Sam S Chang (SS)

Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vrishab Krishna (V)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Siddhant Shingi (S)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Jennifer B Gordetsky (JB)

Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Thomas Gerald (T)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Solomon Woldu (S)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Eugene Shkolyar (E)

Department of Urology, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Dickon Hayne (D)

Department of Urology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Andrew Redfern (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Lisa Spalding (L)

Department of Urology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Courtney Stewart (C)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Eduardo Eyzaguirre (E)

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Shamsunnahar Imtiaz (S)

Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Vikram M Narayan (VM)

Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Vignesh T Packiam (VT)

Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Michael A O'Donnell (MA)

Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Roger Li (R)

Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Loic Baekelandt (L)

Department of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Steven Joniau (S)

Department of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Tahlita Zuiverloon (T)

Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Mario I Fernandez (MI)

Department of Urology, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Marcela Schultz (M)

Department of Pathology, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Patrick J Hensley (PJ)

Department of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

Derek Allison (D)

Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

John A Taylor (JA)

Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Ameer Hamza (A)

Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Ashish Kamat (A)

Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Vivek Nimgaonkar (V)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Snehal Sonawane (S)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Daniel L Miller (DL)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Drew Watson (D)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Damir Vrabac (D)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Anirudh Joshi (A)

Valar Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Jay B Shah (JB)

Department of Urology, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Stephen B Williams (SB)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH