Gross movement counting of fetuses conceived with assisted reproductive technology using a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder.
Assisted reproductive technology
Fetal development
Fetal movement
Fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
In vitro fertilization
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 10 2024
09 10 2024
Historique:
received:
28
09
2023
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
10
10
2024
pubmed:
10
10
2024
entrez:
9
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) affects gross fetal movement. A prospective cohort study. 65 women who conceived with ART (ART group) and 211 women (control group) without ART recorded fetal movement with the fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The number ratio of 10 s epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as the fetal movement parameter. When no fetal movement was observed for more than 5 min, it was defined as a no fetal movement period, and the average number per hour, the average duration, and the longest duration of the no fetal movement periods were calculated as the no fetal movement parameters. Gestational weeks were classified into 28-33 and 34-39 weeks, and the fetal movement parameter and the no fetal movement parameters were compared using the Student's t-test. The fetal movement parameters at 28-33 weeks were 17.43% (ART) and 16.58% (control) (p = 0.219), and those at 34-39 weeks were 11.72% (ART) and 11.96% (control) (p = 0.590). In the same way, for the no fetal movement parameters, the average numbers were 1.58 and 1.63 per hour (p = 0.357), and 2.36 and 2.30 per hour (p = 0.503). The average durations were 8.30 and 8.46 min (p = 0.712), and 9.20 and 9.51 min (p = 0.188). The longest durations were 16.26 and 17.02 min (p = 0.295), and 22.34 and 22.87 min (p = 0.534). ART does not affect gross fetal movement count.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39384755
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70279-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-70279-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23539Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP22K09627
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Spiliopoulos, D. & Economides, D. L. Early fetal growth in progesterone-treated IVF pregnancies. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 294, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3951-3 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3951-3
pubmed: 26563314
Eindhoven, S. C. et al. The influence of IVF/ICSI treatment on human embryonic growth trajectories. Hum. Reprod. 29, 2628–2636. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu271 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu271
pubmed: 25316447
Pinborg, A. et al. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer: Is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?. Hum. Reprod. 29, 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det440 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/humrep/det440
pubmed: 24413766
Nau, T. G. et al. Foetal thymus size in pregnancies after assisted reproductive technologies. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 298, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4795-4 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4795-4
pubmed: 29926171
Yin, L. et al. Effect of assisted reproductive technology on fetal brain development assessed by prenatal ultrasonography. J. Perinat. Med. 43, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0020 (2015).
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0020
pubmed: 24846955
Joy, J., McClure, N., Hepper, P. G. & Cooke, I. Fetal habituation in assisted conception. Early Hum. Dev. 88, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.10.009 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.10.009
pubmed: 22100057
Ryo, E., Nishihara, K., Matsumoto, S. & Kamata, H. A new method for long-term home monitoring of fetal movement by pregnant women themselves. Med. Eng. Phys. 34, 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.001 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.001
pubmed: 21962570
Ryo, E. et al. Reference values for a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder to count fetal movements. Pediatr. Res. 83, 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.328 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.328
pubmed: 29281617
Nishihara, K., Ohki, N., Kamata, H., Ryo, E. & Horiuchi, S. Automated software analysis of fetal movement recorded during a pregnant woman’s sleep at home. PLoS One 10(6), e0130503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130503 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130503
pubmed: 26083422
pmcid: 4470661
Manning, F. A., Platt, L. D. & Sipos, L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 136(6), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(80)90457-3 (1980).
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90457-3
pubmed: 7355965
Morita, M., Ryo, E., Kamata, H., Seto, M. & Yatsuki, K. Counting fetal movements of small-for-gestational infants using a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder. J. Matern. Fetal Neonat. Med. 33, 3699–3705. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1583732 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1583732
Hashimoto, K. et al. Gross motor function and general development of babies born after assisted reproductive technology. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 42, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12898 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/jog.12898
pubmed: 26643798
Drenth Olivares, M. et al. IVF procedures are not, but subfertility is associated with neurological condition of 9-year-old off spring. Early Hum. Dev. 129, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.12.017 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.12.017
pubmed: 30639464
Rumbold, A. R. et al. The impact of specific fertility treatments on cognitive development in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. Hum. Reprod. 32, 1489–1507. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex085 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex085
pubmed: 28472417
Zhan, Q. et al. An overview of studies on psychological well-being in children born flowing assisted reproductive technologies. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 14, 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1300101 (2013).
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300101
pubmed: 24190441
pmcid: 3829644
Liu, L. et al. Association between assisted reproductive technology and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in the offspring: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 7, 46207 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/srep46207
pubmed: 28387368
pmcid: 5384197
Kurjak, A. et al. New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three and four-dimensional sonography. J. Perinat. Med. 36, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.007 (2008).
doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.007
pubmed: 18184100
Morokuma, S. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of fetal brain dysfunction based on behavioral patterns. Brain Dev. 35, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2012.01.007 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.01.007
pubmed: 22321861