Age-adapted painting descriptions change the viewing behavior of young visitors to the Rijksmuseum.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 10 2024
09 10 2024
Historique:
received:
16
05
2024
accepted:
23
09
2024
medline:
10
10
2024
pubmed:
10
10
2024
entrez:
9
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children learn about art by actively engaging with their surroundings. This makes museums potentially rich environments for learning and development. Yet, the descriptions of paintings on show are usually written for adults rather than younger visitors. This study uses mobile eye tracking to examine how painting descriptions tailored for children influence their eye movements when viewing paintings at the Rijksmuseum - the national museum of The Netherlands. Our findings underscore the importance of adapting information specifically for children, rather than simply providing them with adult-oriented museum materials. Children who received information tailored to their developmental level showed increased glance durations to areas highlighted in the descriptions. Strikingly, the behavior of children provided with painting descriptions intended for adults was no different from their behavior when they received no information at all.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39384845
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73963-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-73963-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22880Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 833029
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Museumvereniging. Trends in de museum sector. (2022).
Günay, B. Museum Concept from Past to Present and Importance of Museums as Centers of Art Education. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.55, 1250–1258 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.622
Tišliar, P. The development of Informal Learning and Museum Pedagogy in museums. Eur. J. Contemp. Educ.6, (2017).
Defeyter, M. A. Cognitive development. in An Introduction to Developmental Psychology (eds Slater, A. & Bremmer, G.) 306–340 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (2017).
Lee, K., Anzures, G. & Baluja, A. F. Cognitive development in adolescence. in An Introduction to Developmental Psychology (eds Slater, A. & Bremmer, G.) 543–576 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (2017).
Bailey-Ross, C., Beresford, A. M., Smith, D. T. & Warwick, C. Aesthetic appreciation and Spanish art: insights from eye-tracking. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit.34, i17–i35 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/llc/fqz027
Castellotti, S. et al. Psychophysiological and behavioral responses to descriptive labels in modern art museums. PLoS One. 18, e0284149 (2023).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284149
pubmed: 37134073
pmcid: 10155981
Swami, V. Context matters: investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat Arts. 7, 285–295 (2013).
doi: 10.1037/a0030965
Hidi, S. & Anderson, V. Producing Written summaries: Task demands, Cognitive Operations, and implications for instruction. Rev. Educ. Res.56, 473–493 (1986).
doi: 10.3102/00346543056004473
Hidi, S. & Baird, W. Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Read. Res. Q.23, 465 (1988).
doi: 10.2307/747644
Lucarevschi, C. R. The role of storytelling on language learning: A literature review. (2016). https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/WPLC/article/view/15309
Locher, P. J. The usefulness of eye movement recordings to subject an aesthetic episode with visual art to empirical scrutiny. Psychol. Sci.48, 106–114 (2006).
Nodine, C. F. & Krupinski, E. A. How do viewers look at artworks? Bull. Psychol. Arts. 4, 65–68 (2003).
Theeuwes, J. Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 135, 77–99 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
pubmed: 20507828
Wolfe, J. M. & Horowitz, T. S. Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nat. Hum. Behav.1, 0058 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058
pubmed: 36711068
pmcid: 9879335
Katsuki, F. & Costantinidis, C. Bottom-Up and top-down attention: different processes and overlapping neural systems. Neurosci. 20, 509–521 (2014).
Itti, L. & Koch, C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.2, 194–203 (2001).
doi: 10.1038/35058500
pubmed: 11256080
Kapoula, Z., Daunys, G., Herbez, O. & Yang, Q. Effect of title on Eye-Movement Exploration of Cubist paintings by Fernand Léger. Perception. 38, 479–491 (2009).
doi: 10.1068/p6080
pubmed: 19522318
Tatler, B. W. et al. Eye Movements, and Vision. Iperception. 1, 7–27 (2010).
pubmed: 23396904
pmcid: 3563050
Yarbus, A. L. Eye Movements during Perception of Complex objects. in Eye Movements and Vision 171–211 (Springer US, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7_8 . (1967).
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H. & Rosenberg, R. Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One. 9, 1–8 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
Carbon, C. C. Art perception in the museum: how we spend time and space in art exhibitions. Iperception. 8, 1-15 (2017).
Carbon, C. C. Ecological art experience: how we can Gain Experimental Control while preserving ecologically valid settings and contexts. Front. Psychol.11, 1–14 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00800
Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P. P. L., Scholl, M. & Leder, H. Beyond the lab: an examination of key factors influencing interaction with ‘Real’ and museum-based art. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat Arts. 11, 245–264 (2017).
doi: 10.1037/aca0000141
Walker, F., Bucker, B., Anderson, N. C., Schreij, D. & Theeuwes, J. Looking at paintings in the Vincent Van Gogh Museum: Eye movement patterns of children and adults. PLoS One. 12, e0178912 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178912
pubmed: 28636664
pmcid: 5479528
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P. & Keuleers, E. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: evidence from the Dutch lexicon project 2. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.42, 441–458 (2016).
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000159
pubmed: 26501839
Tobii Tobii Pro Glasses 2 Controller (1.114). (2014). https://www.tobii.com/
Tobii Tobii Pro Lab (1.194.41215). (2022). https://www.tobii.com/
Schindler, I. et al. Measuring aesthetic emotions: a review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLoS One. 12, e0178899 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178899
pubmed: 28582467
pmcid: 5459466
Walther, D. & Koch, C. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Netw.19, 1395–1407 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.10.001
pubmed: 17098563
Foulsham, T. & Underwood, G. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. J. Vis.8, 6 (2008).
doi: 10.1167/8.2.6
Anderson, N. C., Ort, E., Kruijne, W., Meeter, M. & Donk, M. It depends on when you look at it: salience influences eye movements in natural scene viewing and search early in time. J. Vis.15, 9 (2015).
doi: 10.1167/15.5.9
pubmed: 26067527
Ho-Phuoc, T., Guyader, N. & Guérin-Dugué, A. A. Functional and statistical Bottom-Up saliency model to reveal the relative contributions of low-level visual guiding factors. Cognit Comput.2, 344–359 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s12559-010-9078-8