Radiographically Apparent Acetabular Sourcil Landmarks Are Created by Comparable Regions of the Pelvis With Extraarticular Bone Variably Confounding Estimates of Joint Coverage.
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Oct 2024
09 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
11
04
2024
accepted:
13
09
2024
medline:
13
10
2024
pubmed:
13
10
2024
entrez:
10
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The severity of hip dysplasia is characterized by radiographic measurements that require user definition of the acetabular sourcil edge, a bony landmark for which the corresponding three-dimensional (3D) anatomy is not well defined in any imaging plane. To use digitally reconstructed radiographs to determine: (1) What 3D anatomy is contributing to the "acetabular sourcil" location used to make lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) measurements in standing AP and false-profile radiographic views, respectively? (2) How do intraobserver and interobserver agreement in LCEA and ACEA translate into agreement of the 3D anatomy being evaluated? (3) How distinct are regions around the acetabular rim circumference that are evaluated by LCEA and ACEA measurements on radiographs? Between January 2018 and May 2019, 72 patients were indicated for periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia or acetabular retroversion at our institution. From these patients, a series of 10 patients were identified of the first 12 patients in 2018 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy, excluding two with missing or low-quality clinical imaging. A second series of 10 patients was identified of the first 11 patients in 2019 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy and concurrent hip arthroscopy, excluding one who was missing clinical imaging. Pelvis and femoral bone surface models were generated from CT scans of these two series of 10 patients. There were 15 female and five male patients, with a median patient age of 18 years (IQR 17 to 23 years), a preoperative LCEA of 22° (IQR 18° to 24°), and a preoperative ACEA of 23° (IQR 18° to 27°). Exclusion criteria included missing preoperative CT or standard clinical radiographic imaging or severe joint incongruity. To address our first study question, digitally reconstructed radiographs matching each patient's standing AP and false-profile clinical radiographs were created from the segmented CT volumes. A board-certified orthopaedic surgeon and three trained researchers measured LCEA and ACEA on the digitally reconstructed radiographs, and the selected sourcil points were projected back into coordinates in the 3D anatomic space. To address our second study question, intraobserver and interobserver agreement in radiographic coverage angles were related to variations in 3D coordinates of the selected bony anatomy. Lastly, to address our third study question, 3D locations around the acetabular rim identified as contributing to the lateral and anterior sourcil points were summarized across patients in a clockface coordinate system, and statistical analysis of the "time" separating the 3D acetabular contributions of the sourcil edges was performed. The 3D anatomy contributing to the lateral sourcil was a variable length (27 mm [IQR 15 to 34 mm]) span of the laterosuperior acetabular edges, with contributions by the anterior inferior iliac spine in 35% (7 of 20) of hips. The anterior sourcil reflected a 28-mm (IQR 25 to 31 mm) span of bone from the medial ilium (posterior-medial to the anterior-inferior iliac spine and anterior-lateral to the arcuate line) to the anterior and lateral edges of the acetabulum. Interobserver variability was good for LCEA (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.82 to 0.83) and moderate to good for ACEA (ICC 0.73 to 0.79), whereas the agreement in identified 3D sourcil locations varied widely (ICC 0.32 to 0.95). The acetabular edge of the 3D anatomy contributing to the anterior sourcil overlapped the circumferential range of the acetabular rim contributing to the lateral sourcil. Projection of two-dimensional radiographic landmarks contributing to the diagnosis of structural hip deformity into 3D allowed for the identification of the overlapping bony anatomy contributing to radiographically visible anterior and lateral sourcil edges. This work leveraging digitally reconstructed radiographs and 3D pelvis anatomy has found that bone outside the joint contributes to the radiographic appearance of the sourcil and may variably confound estimates of joint coverage. Furthermore, the substantial overlap between the acetabular bone contributing to measurement of the LCEA and ACEA would indicate that these angles measure similar acetabular deformity, and that additional measures are needed to assess anterior coverage independent of lateral coverage.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The severity of hip dysplasia is characterized by radiographic measurements that require user definition of the acetabular sourcil edge, a bony landmark for which the corresponding three-dimensional (3D) anatomy is not well defined in any imaging plane.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
OBJECTIVE
To use digitally reconstructed radiographs to determine: (1) What 3D anatomy is contributing to the "acetabular sourcil" location used to make lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) measurements in standing AP and false-profile radiographic views, respectively? (2) How do intraobserver and interobserver agreement in LCEA and ACEA translate into agreement of the 3D anatomy being evaluated? (3) How distinct are regions around the acetabular rim circumference that are evaluated by LCEA and ACEA measurements on radiographs?
METHODS
METHODS
Between January 2018 and May 2019, 72 patients were indicated for periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia or acetabular retroversion at our institution. From these patients, a series of 10 patients were identified of the first 12 patients in 2018 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy, excluding two with missing or low-quality clinical imaging. A second series of 10 patients was identified of the first 11 patients in 2019 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy and concurrent hip arthroscopy, excluding one who was missing clinical imaging. Pelvis and femoral bone surface models were generated from CT scans of these two series of 10 patients. There were 15 female and five male patients, with a median patient age of 18 years (IQR 17 to 23 years), a preoperative LCEA of 22° (IQR 18° to 24°), and a preoperative ACEA of 23° (IQR 18° to 27°). Exclusion criteria included missing preoperative CT or standard clinical radiographic imaging or severe joint incongruity. To address our first study question, digitally reconstructed radiographs matching each patient's standing AP and false-profile clinical radiographs were created from the segmented CT volumes. A board-certified orthopaedic surgeon and three trained researchers measured LCEA and ACEA on the digitally reconstructed radiographs, and the selected sourcil points were projected back into coordinates in the 3D anatomic space. To address our second study question, intraobserver and interobserver agreement in radiographic coverage angles were related to variations in 3D coordinates of the selected bony anatomy. Lastly, to address our third study question, 3D locations around the acetabular rim identified as contributing to the lateral and anterior sourcil points were summarized across patients in a clockface coordinate system, and statistical analysis of the "time" separating the 3D acetabular contributions of the sourcil edges was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The 3D anatomy contributing to the lateral sourcil was a variable length (27 mm [IQR 15 to 34 mm]) span of the laterosuperior acetabular edges, with contributions by the anterior inferior iliac spine in 35% (7 of 20) of hips. The anterior sourcil reflected a 28-mm (IQR 25 to 31 mm) span of bone from the medial ilium (posterior-medial to the anterior-inferior iliac spine and anterior-lateral to the arcuate line) to the anterior and lateral edges of the acetabulum. Interobserver variability was good for LCEA (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.82 to 0.83) and moderate to good for ACEA (ICC 0.73 to 0.79), whereas the agreement in identified 3D sourcil locations varied widely (ICC 0.32 to 0.95). The acetabular edge of the 3D anatomy contributing to the anterior sourcil overlapped the circumferential range of the acetabular rim contributing to the lateral sourcil.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Projection of two-dimensional radiographic landmarks contributing to the diagnosis of structural hip deformity into 3D allowed for the identification of the overlapping bony anatomy contributing to radiographically visible anterior and lateral sourcil edges.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
This work leveraging digitally reconstructed radiographs and 3D pelvis anatomy has found that bone outside the joint contributes to the radiographic appearance of the sourcil and may variably confound estimates of joint coverage. Furthermore, the substantial overlap between the acetabular bone contributing to measurement of the LCEA and ACEA would indicate that these angles measure similar acetabular deformity, and that additional measures are needed to assess anterior coverage independent of lateral coverage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39387480
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003268
pii: 00003086-990000000-01761
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R25GM058939
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Références
Aitken HD, Miller A, Rivas DJL, et al. Radiographically successful periacetabular osteotomy does not achieve optimal contact mechanics in dysplastic hips. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2023;104:105928.
Badrinath R, Jeffords ME, Bomar JD, et al. 3D characterization of acetabular deficiency in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Indian J Orthop. 2020;55:1576-1582.
Beltran LS, Rosenberg ZS, Mayo JD, et al. Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:1077-1088.
Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Fine JP. Classification and localization of acetabular labral tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:391-397.
Brown S, Bailey DL, Willowson K, Baldock C. Investigation of the relationship between linear attenuation coefficients and CT Hounsfield units using radionuclides for SPECT. Appl Radiat Isotopes. 2008;66:1206-1212.
Carlisle JC, Zebala LP, Shia DS, et al. Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy. Iowa Orthop J. 2011;31:52-58.
Cheng H, Ren N, Gu W, et al. Comparison of anterior center-edge angle measured from the acetabular sourcil versus the anterior bone-edge of the acetabulum: a descriptive laboratory study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12:23259671231221295.
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 (Suppl 4):47-66.
Cooperman D. What is the evidence to support acetabular dysplasia as a cause of osteoarthritis? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33 Suppl 1:S2-7.
Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:79-85.
DeFroda SF, Alter TD, Lambers F, et al. Quantification of acetabular coverage on 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography scan bone models in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a descriptive study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211049457.
Disantis AE, Martin RL, Enseki K, Spaid V, McClincy M. Non-operative rehabilitation principles for use in individuals with acetabular dysplasia: a north American based Delphi study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023;18:1331-1345.
Domb BG, Owens JS, Glein RM, Jimenez AE, Maldonado DR. Borderline dysplasia after primary hip arthroscopy with capsular plication and labral preservation: ten-year survivorship and patient-reported outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105:687-699.
Domb BG, Stake CE, Lindner D, El-Bitar Y, Jackson TJ. Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: two-year clinical outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2591-2598.
Fabeck L, Farrokh D, Behets C, Delince P. Anatomical and radiological correlation of lequesne’s “false profile.” Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24:212-216.
Featherall J, Metz AK, Froerer DL, et al. False-profile radiograph sourcil-edge and bone-edge measurements correlate to different weightbearing regions of the acetabulum: a 3-dimensional analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52:2603-2610.
French M, Thorhauer ED, Kimura T, Sangeorzan BJ, Ledoux WR. Displacement of the metatarsal sesamoids in relation to first metatarsophalangeal joint extension. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022;7:24730114221126457.
Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ. The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:199-204.
Graesser EA, Schwabe MT, Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ. Defining the borderline dysplastic hip: high variability in acetabular coverage and femoral morphology on low-dose computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51:2551-2558.
Hanson JA, Kapron AL, Swenson KM, et al. Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2:280-286.
Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20-33.
Hetsroni I, Poultsides L, Bedi A, Larson CM, Kelly BT. Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2497-2503.
Horberg JV, Bailey JR, Mikesell TA, Graham RD, Allan DG. Assessing the weight-bearing surface in dysplastic acetabulae: the sourcil index. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:56-61.
Huang P, Wang D, Mo Y, Zheng Y, Ning B. Teardrop and sourcil line (TSL): a novel radiographic sign that predicts residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) in DDH after closed reduction. Transl Pediatr. 2022;11:458-465.
Irie T, Espinoza Orias AA, Irie TY, et al. Computed tomography-based three-dimensional analyses show similarities in anterosuperior acetabular coverage between acetabular dysplasia and borderline dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:2623-2632.
Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:211-218.
Kamenaga T, Ritacco L, Slullitel PA, et al. Prediction of 3-dimensional coverage surface area of the femoral head in hip dysplasia through conventional computed tomography. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12:23259671241234684.
Karns MR, Jacxsens M, Uffmann WJ, et al. The critical acromial point: the anatomic location of the lateral acromion in the critical shoulder angle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:151-159.
Kokubu Y, Kawahara S, Kitamura K, et al. Evaluation of the anterior acetabular coverage with a false profile radiograph considering appropriate range of positioning. Sci Rep. 2023;13:8288.
Lane NE, Lin P, Christiansen L, et al. Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:400-404.
Lequesne M, Djian A. [New radiographic angles for the study of the hip. The “false profile” of the pelvis] [in French]. Vie Med. 1961;42:1629-1641.
Levine L, Levine M. DRRGenerator: a three-dimensional slicer extension for the rapid and easy development of digitally reconstructed radiographs. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020;10:69.
Lewis CL, Khuu A, Marinko LN. Postural correction reduces hip pain in adult with acetabular dysplasia: a case report. Man Ther. 2015;20:508-512.
Li PL, Ganz R. Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003:245-253.
Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:188-199.
Meyer AM, Schaver AL, Cohen BH, et al. Fear index in predicting treatment among patients with femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia and the relationship of femoral version. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022;9:84-89.
Millis MB, McClincy M. Periacetabular osteotomy to treat residual dysplasia in adolescents and young adults: indications, complications, results. J Child Orthop. 2018;12:349-357.
Mittal A, Bomar JD, Jeffords ME, et al. Defining the lateral edge of the femoroacetabular articulation: correlation analysis between radiographs and computed tomography. J Child Orthop. 2016;10:365-370.
Miyasaka D, Ito T, Imai N, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of femoral head coverage in normal and dysplastic hips: a novel method. Acta Med Okayama. 2014;68:277-284.
Monazzam S, Bomar JD, Cidambi K, Kruk P, Hosalkar H. Lateral center-edge angle on conventional radiography and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2233-2237.
Mozingo JD, Schuring LL, Mortensen AJ, Anderson AE, Aoki SK. Effect of patient positioning on measurement of the anterior center-edge angle on false-profile radiographs and its 3-dimensional mapping to the acetabular rim. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10:23259671211073834.
Nepple JJ, Wells J, Ross JR, et al. Three patterns of acetabular deficiency are common in young adult patients with acetabular dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:1037-1044.
Philippon MJ, Michalski MP, Campbell KJ, et al. An anatomical study of the acetabulum with clinical applications to hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1673-1682.
Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, et al. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571-1580.
Pointon JL, Wen T, Tugwell-Allsup J, et al. Simulation of x-ray projections on GPU: benchmarking gVirtualXray with clinically realistic phantoms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023;234:107500.
Putnam SM, Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ. Do changes in pelvic rotation and tilt affect measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile radiographs? A cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477:1066-1072.
Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:787-793.
Rivas DJ, Aitken HD, Dibbern KN, et al. Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2024;238:237-249.
Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Is vertical-center-anterior angle equivalent to anterior coverage of the hip? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2865-2871.
Samani DJ, Weinstein SL. The pelvic tear-figure: a three-dimensional analysis of the anatomy and effects of rotation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:650-659.
Slullitel PA, Holc F, Buljubasich M, et al. Anterior center-edge angle is less reliable than anterior wall index to predict anterior coverage of the femoral head. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51:2151-2160.
Spiker AM, Fabricant PD, Wong AC, Suryavanshi JR, Sink EL. Radiographic and clinical characteristics associated with a positive part (prone apprehension relocation test): a new provocative exam to elicit hip instability. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020;7:288-297.
Tannast M, Fritsch S, Zheng G, Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD. Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1255-1266.
Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1234-1246.
Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, et al. Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1199-1205.
Thomas GE, Palmer AJ, Batra RN, et al. Subclinical deformities of the hip are significant predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis and joint replacement in women. A 20 year longitudinal cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:1504-1510.
Uemura K, Hiraiwa T, Okamoto M, Tokunaga K, Anderson AE. The anterior center edge angle has limited ability to predict three-dimensional coverage of the femoral head in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing curved periacetabular osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143:1323-1330.
Unberath M, Zaech JN, Lee SC, et al. DeepDRR - a catalyst for machine learning in fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2018;11073:98-106.
van der Bom MJ, Groote ME, Vincken KL, Beek FJ, Bartels LW. Pelvic rotation and tilt can cause misinterpretation of the acetabular index measured on radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1743-1749.
Vaudreuil NJ, McClincy MP. Evaluation and treatment of borderline dysplasia: moving beyond the lateral center edge angle. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13:28-37.
Vijayan V. Ray casting for deformable triangular 3d meshes. 2022. MATLAB Central File Exchange. Available at: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/41504-ray-casting-for-deformable-triangular-3d-meshes. Accessed June 10, 2022.
Welton KL, Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, Mei-Dan O. Radiographic parameters of adult hip dysplasia. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11:23259671231152868.
Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference on the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand Supple. 1939;83:28-38.
Willey M. Diagnosis and management of borderline hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion. J Hip Surg. 2018;02:156-166.
Willey MC, Kern AM, Goetz JE, Marsh JL, Anderson DD. Biomechanical guidance can improve accuracy of reduction for intra-articular tibia plafond fractures and reduce joint contact stress. J Orthop Res. 2023;41:546-554.
Willey MC, Kern AM, Goetz JE, Marsh JL, Anderson DD. Biomechanical guidance can improve accuracy of reduction for intra-articular tibia plafond fractures and reduce joint contact stress. J Orthop Res. 2023;41:546-554.
Wylie JD, Kapron AL, Peters CL, Aoki SK, Maak TG. Relationship between the lateral center-edge angle and 3-dimensional acetabular coverage. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2325967117700589.
Zhang DG, Pan X, Zhang H, et al. The lateral center-edge angle as radiographic selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged above 13 years. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2020;21:493.
Zhang J, Li C, Zhang J, Zhao G, Liu Y. Lateral center-edge angle of 18 degrees (bone-edge): threshold for hip arthroscopy treatment in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip? Orthop Surg. 2023;15:2665-2673.
Zimmerer A, Schneider MM, Nietschke R, Miehlke W, Sobau C. Is hip arthroscopy an adequate therapy for the borderline dysplastic hip? Correlation between radiologic findings and clinical outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120920851.
Zingg PO, Werner CM, Sukthankar A, et al. The anterior center edge angle in Lequesne’s false profile view: interrater correlation, dependence on pelvic tilt and correlation to anterior acetabular coverage in the sagital plane. A cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:787-791.