Clinical Features, Long-Term Prognosis, and Clinical Management of Genotype-Negative Long QT Syndrome Patients.

clinical management genetics life-threatening arrhythmias long QT syndrome β-blockers

Journal

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
ISSN: 2405-5018
Titre abrégé: JACC Clin Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101656995

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 13 05 2024
revised: 16 07 2024
accepted: 22 07 2024
medline: 13 10 2024
pubmed: 13 10 2024
entrez: 10 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Approximately 15% to 20% of patients clinically diagnosed with long QT syndrome (LQTS) are genotype-negative (GEN-). Whether they have a different arrhythmic risk or should be managed differently remains unclear, often leading to incomplete treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical aspects of GEN- and genotype-positive (GEN+) LQTS patients. We retrospectively evaluated 832 LQTS patients genetically screened in Japan (n = 347) and Italy (n = 485), including 698 with a disease-causing variant in the KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A genes (GEN+), and 134 without variants in these LQTS-related genes (GEN-). At diagnosis, the Japanese patients were more often probands (86% vs 60%), symptomatic (39% vs 18%), and of younger age than the Italian patients; conversely, they used less β-blockers (65% vs 95%), more rarely had a family history (FH) of LQTS (42% vs 73%), and had more cardiac events during follow-up (13% vs 4%) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Within the Japanese cohort, the GEN- had more cardiac arrests, used less β-blockers, and had much less FH for LQTS compared their GEN+ counterpart. The Italian cohort was more homogeneous, with just more LQTS FH among the GEN+. QTc shortening (close to 30 ms in all groups) during follow-up was similar between Japanese and Italian patients, irrespective of their being GEN+ or GEN-. In both cohorts, during an average follow-up of 6 and 7 years, respectively, GEN+ and GEN- patients showed a comparable clinical outcome. Arrhythmic risk is similar between GEN+ and GEN- LQTS patients; they should be managed and treated in the same way.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Approximately 15% to 20% of patients clinically diagnosed with long QT syndrome (LQTS) are genotype-negative (GEN-). Whether they have a different arrhythmic risk or should be managed differently remains unclear, often leading to incomplete treatment.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical aspects of GEN- and genotype-positive (GEN+) LQTS patients.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated 832 LQTS patients genetically screened in Japan (n = 347) and Italy (n = 485), including 698 with a disease-causing variant in the KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A genes (GEN+), and 134 without variants in these LQTS-related genes (GEN-).
RESULTS RESULTS
At diagnosis, the Japanese patients were more often probands (86% vs 60%), symptomatic (39% vs 18%), and of younger age than the Italian patients; conversely, they used less β-blockers (65% vs 95%), more rarely had a family history (FH) of LQTS (42% vs 73%), and had more cardiac events during follow-up (13% vs 4%) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Within the Japanese cohort, the GEN- had more cardiac arrests, used less β-blockers, and had much less FH for LQTS compared their GEN+ counterpart. The Italian cohort was more homogeneous, with just more LQTS FH among the GEN+. QTc shortening (close to 30 ms in all groups) during follow-up was similar between Japanese and Italian patients, irrespective of their being GEN+ or GEN-. In both cohorts, during an average follow-up of 6 and 7 years, respectively, GEN+ and GEN- patients showed a comparable clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Arrhythmic risk is similar between GEN+ and GEN- LQTS patients; they should be managed and treated in the same way.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39387742
pii: S2405-500X(24)00750-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work has been partially supported by a grant from Health Science Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (21FC1004, 23FC1003 to Dr Aiba), a Japanese Circulation Society research grant for genome analysis project in cardiovascular diseases (to Drs Horie and Aiba), the Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente grant ‘Registry of Cardiac Channelopathies’, the EJP RD Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2019–Project LQTS-NEXT–EJPRD19-187, and the Fondation Leducq grant 18CVD05 “Towards Precision Medicine with Human iPSCs for Cardiac Channelopathies” (to Drs Crotti and Schwartz). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Keiko Shimamoto (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan; Medical Genome Center, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

Federica Dagradi (F)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy.

Seiko Ohno (S)

Medical Genome Center, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.

Carla Spazzolini (C)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy.

Lia Crotti (L)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Fulvio L F Giovenzana (FLF)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy.

Giulia Musu (G)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy.

Matteo Pedrazzini (M)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy.

Kengo Kusano (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

Misa Takegami (M)

Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

Kunihiro Nishimura (K)

Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

Minoru Horie (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.

Takeshi Aiba (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan; Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan. Electronic address: aiba@ncvc.go.jp.

Peter J Schwartz (PJ)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: p.schwartz@auxologico.it.

Classifications MeSH