Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review.
Clinical Practice
Guidelines
OASIS
Perineal care
Recommendations
Severe perineal tears
Journal
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
12
05
2024
revised:
30
08
2024
accepted:
30
09
2024
medline:
11
10
2024
pubmed:
11
10
2024
entrez:
10
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included. Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations. Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39388912
pii: S0301-2115(24)00536-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.042
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362-369Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Professor M. Cosson has contracts from Ab medica, Promedon, Syliva, Proveday and receives consulting fees from Boston scientific and honoraria for educational events from Boston scientific and Promedon. He is also a founder of Digyne start-up.The other authors declare no conflict of interest.