Neurotoxicology of Warfare Arsenical, Diphenylarsinic Acid in Humans and Experimental Models.
Cerebellar-brainstem dysfunction
Clarks I and II
DPAA
Neurotoxicity
Warfare agents
behavioral function
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Oct 2024
08 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
08
06
2024
revised:
07
10
2024
accepted:
08
10
2024
medline:
11
10
2024
pubmed:
11
10
2024
entrez:
10
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Unused warfare chemical agents, developed in World Wars I/II dumped in the ocean or buried at various sites across the world, pose significant environmental and human health risks. This review provides description of the neurotoxicity of arsenic-based warfare chemicals known as arsenicals. We specifically described the neuropathogenesis of diphenylarsinic acid (DPAA), a chemical warfare-related organoarsenicals and a degradation product of diphenylchloroarsine (DA), diphenylcyanoarsine (DC), also known as Clark I and Clark II respectively. These arsenicals are potent emetics, which were buried at a former naval base in the town of Kamisu, Japan. Several decades after burial, their environmental decay led to contamination of underground water table. Consumption of the contaminated water by the residents manifested a neurological syndrome, which was associated with damage to the cerebellum and brainstem as well as behavioral deficits. We summarized the chronology of this damage as recorded by monitoring the exposed population over time (∼15 years). Several simulating animal studies in primates and murine models demonstrate that DPAA caused this syndrome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39389373
pii: S0045-6535(24)02416-0
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143516
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
143516Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐ The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: