Clinical efficacy analysis of endoscopic band electrocision ligation surgical method in the treatment of small submucosal tumors of the gastric fundus.

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) band electrocision ligation (EEL) complications endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)

Journal

Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy
ISSN: 1365-2931
Titre abrégé: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9612996

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 11 10 2024
pubmed: 11 10 2024
entrez: 11 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic band electrocision ligation (EEL) in the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). We analyzed the clinical data of 130 patients with gastrointestinal SMTs (diameter ≤10 mm) who underwent endoscopic resection, including 62 cases in the EEL group and 68 in the ESD group, and compared indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and surgical cost, between the EEL and ESD group. EEL surgery time (8.9 ± 1.1 min) was significantly shorter than the ESD group (62.3 ± 2.8 min) ( In treating gastric muscular, mucosal, or submucosal tumors with a diameter of less than 10 mm, the EEL surgical method was superior to the ESD surgical method in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two methods, which was worthy of clinical application.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic band electrocision ligation (EEL) in the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs).
METHOD UNASSIGNED
We analyzed the clinical data of 130 patients with gastrointestinal SMTs (diameter ≤10 mm) who underwent endoscopic resection, including 62 cases in the EEL group and 68 in the ESD group, and compared indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and surgical cost, between the EEL and ESD group.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
EEL surgery time (8.9 ± 1.1 min) was significantly shorter than the ESD group (62.3 ± 2.8 min) (
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
In treating gastric muscular, mucosal, or submucosal tumors with a diameter of less than 10 mm, the EEL surgical method was superior to the ESD surgical method in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two methods, which was worthy of clinical application.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39392255
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2413113
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-9

Auteurs

Hui Zhang (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Zhisheng Huang (Z)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Yingyun Zhong (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Shuguang Su (S)

Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Classifications MeSH