Growth, physical, and cognitive function in children who are born HIV-free: School-age follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial in rural Zimbabwe.


Journal

PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 31 12 2023
accepted: 26 08 2024
medline: 11 10 2024
pubmed: 11 10 2024
entrez: 11 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Globally, over 16 million children were exposed to HIV during pregnancy but remain HIV-free at birth and throughout childhood by 2022. Children born HIV-free (CBHF) have higher morbidity and mortality and poorer neurodevelopment in early life compared to children who are HIV-unexposed (CHU), but long-term outcomes remain uncertain. We characterised school-age growth, cognitive and physical function in CBHF and CHU previously enrolled in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in rural Zimbabwe. The SHINE trial enrolled pregnant women between 2012 and 2015 across 2 rural Zimbabwean districts. Co-primary outcomes were height-for-age Z-score and haemoglobin at age 18 months (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01824940). Children were re-enrolled if they were aged 7 years, resident in Shurugwi district, and had known pregnancy HIV-exposure status. From 5,280 pregnant women originally enrolled, 376 CBHF and 2016 CHU reached the trial endpoint at 18 months in Shurugwi; of these, 264 CBHF and 990 CHU were evaluated at age 7 years using the School-Age Health, Activity, Resilience, Anthropometry and Neurocognitive (SAHARAN) toolbox. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-II), with additional tools measuring executive function, literacy, numeracy, fine motor skills, and socioemotional function. Physical function was assessed using standing broad jump and handgrip for strength, and the shuttle-run test for cardiovascular fitness. Growth was assessed by anthropometry. Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance analysis and skinfold thicknesses. A caregiver questionnaire measured demographics, socioeconomic status, nurturing, child discipline, food, and water insecurity. We prespecified the primary comparisons and used generalised estimating equations with an exchangeable working correlation structure to account for clustering. Adjusted models used covariates from the trial (study arm, study nurse, exact child age, sex, calendar month measured, and ambient temperature). They also included covariates derived from directed acyclic graphs, with separate models adjusted for contemporary variables (socioeconomic status, household food insecurity, religion, social support, gender norms, caregiver depression, age, caregiver education, adversity score, and number of children's books) and early-life variables (length-for-age-Z-score) at 18 months, birthweight, maternal baseline depression, household diet, maternal schooling and haemoglobin, socioeconomic status, facility birth, and gender norms. We applied a Bonferroni correction for the 27 comparisons (0.05/27) with threshold of p < 0.00185 as significant. We found strong evidence that cognitive function was lower in CBHF compared to CHU across multiple domains. The KABC-II mental processing index was 45.2 (standard deviation (SD) 10.5) in CBHF and 48.3 (11.3) in CHU (mean difference 3.3 points [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.0, 4.5]; p < 0.001). The school achievement test score was 39.0 (SD 26.0) in CBHF and 45.7 (27.8) in CHU (mean difference 7.3 points [95% CI 3.6, 10.9]; p < 0.001); differences remained significant in adjusted analyses. Executive function was reduced but not significantly in adjusted analyses. We found no consistent evidence of differences in growth or physical function outcomes. The main limitation of our study was the restriction to one of two previous study districts, with possible survivor and selection bias. In this study, we found that CBHF had reductions in cognitive function compared to CHU at 7 years of age across multiple domains. Further research is needed to define the biological and psychosocial mechanisms underlying these differences to inform future interventions that help CBHF thrive across the life-course. ClinicalTrials.gov The SHINE follow-up study was registered with the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202201828512110). The original SHINE trial was registered at NCT https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01824940.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Globally, over 16 million children were exposed to HIV during pregnancy but remain HIV-free at birth and throughout childhood by 2022. Children born HIV-free (CBHF) have higher morbidity and mortality and poorer neurodevelopment in early life compared to children who are HIV-unexposed (CHU), but long-term outcomes remain uncertain. We characterised school-age growth, cognitive and physical function in CBHF and CHU previously enrolled in the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial in rural Zimbabwe.
METHODS AND FINDINGS RESULTS
The SHINE trial enrolled pregnant women between 2012 and 2015 across 2 rural Zimbabwean districts. Co-primary outcomes were height-for-age Z-score and haemoglobin at age 18 months (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01824940). Children were re-enrolled if they were aged 7 years, resident in Shurugwi district, and had known pregnancy HIV-exposure status. From 5,280 pregnant women originally enrolled, 376 CBHF and 2016 CHU reached the trial endpoint at 18 months in Shurugwi; of these, 264 CBHF and 990 CHU were evaluated at age 7 years using the School-Age Health, Activity, Resilience, Anthropometry and Neurocognitive (SAHARAN) toolbox. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-II), with additional tools measuring executive function, literacy, numeracy, fine motor skills, and socioemotional function. Physical function was assessed using standing broad jump and handgrip for strength, and the shuttle-run test for cardiovascular fitness. Growth was assessed by anthropometry. Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance analysis and skinfold thicknesses. A caregiver questionnaire measured demographics, socioeconomic status, nurturing, child discipline, food, and water insecurity. We prespecified the primary comparisons and used generalised estimating equations with an exchangeable working correlation structure to account for clustering. Adjusted models used covariates from the trial (study arm, study nurse, exact child age, sex, calendar month measured, and ambient temperature). They also included covariates derived from directed acyclic graphs, with separate models adjusted for contemporary variables (socioeconomic status, household food insecurity, religion, social support, gender norms, caregiver depression, age, caregiver education, adversity score, and number of children's books) and early-life variables (length-for-age-Z-score) at 18 months, birthweight, maternal baseline depression, household diet, maternal schooling and haemoglobin, socioeconomic status, facility birth, and gender norms. We applied a Bonferroni correction for the 27 comparisons (0.05/27) with threshold of p < 0.00185 as significant. We found strong evidence that cognitive function was lower in CBHF compared to CHU across multiple domains. The KABC-II mental processing index was 45.2 (standard deviation (SD) 10.5) in CBHF and 48.3 (11.3) in CHU (mean difference 3.3 points [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.0, 4.5]; p < 0.001). The school achievement test score was 39.0 (SD 26.0) in CBHF and 45.7 (27.8) in CHU (mean difference 7.3 points [95% CI 3.6, 10.9]; p < 0.001); differences remained significant in adjusted analyses. Executive function was reduced but not significantly in adjusted analyses. We found no consistent evidence of differences in growth or physical function outcomes. The main limitation of our study was the restriction to one of two previous study districts, with possible survivor and selection bias.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we found that CBHF had reductions in cognitive function compared to CHU at 7 years of age across multiple domains. Further research is needed to define the biological and psychosocial mechanisms underlying these differences to inform future interventions that help CBHF thrive across the life-course.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov The SHINE follow-up study was registered with the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202201828512110). The original SHINE trial was registered at NCT https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01824940.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39392862
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004347
pii: PMEDICINE-D-23-03875
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01824940']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1004347

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Piper et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Joe D Piper (JD)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Clever Mazhanga (C)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Marian Mwapaura (M)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Gloria Mapako (G)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Idah Mapurisa (I)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Tsitsi Mashedze (T)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Eunice Munyama (E)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Maria Kuona (M)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Thombizodwa Mashiri (T)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Kundai Sibanda (K)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Dzidzai Matemavi (D)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Monica Tichagwa (M)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Soneni Nyoni (S)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Asinje Saidi (A)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Manasa Mangwende (M)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Dzivaidzo Chidhanguro (D)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Eddington Mpofu (E)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Joice Tome (J)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Gabriel Mbewe (G)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Batsirai Mutasa (B)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Bernard Chasekwa (B)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Handrea Njovo (H)

Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Chandiwana Nyachowe (C)

Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Mary Muchekeza (M)

Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Kuda Mutasa (K)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Virginia Sauramba (V)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ceri Evans (C)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Melissa J Gladstone (MJ)

Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Jonathan C Wells (JC)

Population Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Elizabeth Allen (E)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Melanie Smuk (M)

Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Jean H Humphrey (JH)

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Lisa F Langhaug (LF)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Naume V Tavengwa (NV)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Robert Ntozini (R)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Andrew J Prendergast (AJ)

Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH