Nighttime/Weekend Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Is Not Associated With Increased 1-Year Mortality for Non-Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Indications.

critical care extracorporeal membrane oxygenation staffing timing

Journal

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
ISSN: 1532-8422
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110208

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
revised: 22 07 2024
accepted: 02 08 2024
medline: 12 10 2024
pubmed: 12 10 2024
entrez: 11 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The process of placing a patient on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is complex and requires the activation and coordination of numerous personnel from a variety of disciplines to achieve procedural success, initiate flow, and subsequently monitor the patient's condition. The literature suggests that nighttime cannulation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is associated with adverse outcomes compared to daytime cannulation. Given the strain on personnel that this process can create, it is plausible that patients who are initiated on VA-ECMO for non-ECPR indications during the nighttime and on weekends, which are generally periods with reduced staffing compared to weekday daytime hours, also may experience worse outcomes, including decreased survival. This study aimed to determine whether nighttime/weekend VA-ECMO cannulation is associated with worse outcomes, including decreased survival. Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Large quaternary academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: Patients INTERVENTIONS: VA-ECMO cannulation during the day versus night/weekends MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective review of patients at a single center who underwent VA-ECMO cannulation between 2011 and 2021. The 468 patients included 158 patients (33.8%) in the daytime cannulation cohort and 310 (66.2%) in the nighttime/weekend cannulation cohort. Nighttime and weekend VA-ECMO cannulations were not associated with increased 1-year mortality (64.2% vs 60.1%; p = 0.42) or with increased use of renal replacement therapy (25.4% vs 22.2%; p = 0.49). We conclude that nighttime and weekend VA-ECMO cannulations can be performed safely at a large academic medical center.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The process of placing a patient on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is complex and requires the activation and coordination of numerous personnel from a variety of disciplines to achieve procedural success, initiate flow, and subsequently monitor the patient's condition. The literature suggests that nighttime cannulation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is associated with adverse outcomes compared to daytime cannulation. Given the strain on personnel that this process can create, it is plausible that patients who are initiated on VA-ECMO for non-ECPR indications during the nighttime and on weekends, which are generally periods with reduced staffing compared to weekday daytime hours, also may experience worse outcomes, including decreased survival. This study aimed to determine whether nighttime/weekend VA-ECMO cannulation is associated with worse outcomes, including decreased survival.
DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Large quaternary academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: Patients INTERVENTIONS: VA-ECMO cannulation during the day versus night/weekends MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective review of patients at a single center who underwent VA-ECMO cannulation between 2011 and 2021. The 468 patients included 158 patients (33.8%) in the daytime cannulation cohort and 310 (66.2%) in the nighttime/weekend cannulation cohort. Nighttime and weekend VA-ECMO cannulations were not associated with increased 1-year mortality (64.2% vs 60.1%; p = 0.42) or with increased use of renal replacement therapy (25.4% vs 22.2%; p = 0.49).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that nighttime and weekend VA-ECMO cannulations can be performed safely at a large academic medical center.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39393988
pii: S1053-0770(24)00520-2
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for Journal for Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article.

Auteurs

Dane C Paneitz (DC)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Shu Y Lu (SY)

Division of Cardiac Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Jamel Ortoleva (J)

Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Eriberto Michel (E)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

David A D'Alessandro (DA)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Asishana A Osho (AA)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Jerome Crowley (J)

Division of Cardiac Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Adam A Dalia (AA)

Division of Cardiac Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: aadalia@mgh.harvard.edu.

Classifications MeSH