Comparing the effectiveness of a blended video plus face-to-face educational program with a face-to-face educational program on quality of life among adolescents undergoing hemodialysis in Palestine.
adolescent
educational program
quality of life
video assisted
Journal
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis
ISSN: 1542-4758
Titre abrégé: Hemodial Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101093910
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Oct 2024
13 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
19
09
2024
received:
19
06
2024
accepted:
25
09
2024
medline:
14
10
2024
pubmed:
14
10
2024
entrez:
13
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Hemodialysis is frequently used as a primary treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and it significantly impacts the quality of life in adolescents undergoing this procedure. Providing a hemodialysis education to these patients is a valuable strategy for enhancing their well-being. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of the video-assisted educational program on the quality of life among adolescents undergoing hemodialysis in Palestine. This study employed a quasi-experimental design, a pre-test-post-test interventional study, involving a sample of 68 adolescent patients between the ages of 13 and 18 diagnosed with ESKD. The quality of life level was assessed in both groups using an Arabic version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ version 3.0 ESKD Module survey. The study was conducted at the dialysis units in four hospitals associated with Augusta Victoria Hospital, An-Najah University Hospital, Palestine Medical Complex/Ramallah, and Beit Jala (Al Housain) Hospital. The study involved providing tailored face-to-face educational sessions with video assistance to the experimental group, while the control group received regular face-to-face education. The Generalized Estimating Equation analysis revealed no significant differences in quality of life between the experimental and control groups over time, across pre-test, post-test, and follow-up periods (p ≥ 0.05). However, within the experimental group, there was a significant improvement in total quality of life scores between the pre-test, post-test, and post-test follow-up (p ≤ 0.001), although the difference between the pre-test and follow-up approached significance but was not statistically significant (p = 0.056). In contrast, the control group showed significant differences in quality of life across the pre-test, post-test, and follow-up time points (p ≤ 0.05). Implementing suitable interventions can potentially enhance the quality of life for individuals undergoing hemodialysis. Consequently, we suggest using video-based education as a cost-effective, uncomplicated, and engaging approach for educating hemodialysis patients.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 International Society for Hemodialysis.
Références
Mitsnefes MM, Laskin BL, Dahhou M, Zhang X, Foster BJ. Mortality risk among children initially treated with dialysis for end‐stage kidney disease, 1990‐2010. JAMA. 2013;309(18):1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.4208
Massengill S, Ferris M. Chronic kidney disease in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rev. 2014;35(1):16–29.
Francis A, Didsbury MS, Van Zwieten A, Chen K, James LJ, Kim S, et al. Quality of life of children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease: a cross‐sectional study. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(2):134–140. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314934
Mitsnefes MM. Cardiovascular disease in children with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(4):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011111115
Hansen M, Tesfaye W, Sewlal B, Mehta B, Sud K, Kairaitis L, et al. Psychosocial factors affecting end‐stage kidney disease patients and the impact of social worker. Research Square. 2021 https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-330231/v1
Roumelioti ME, Argyropoulos CP, Unruh ML. Sleep disorders in patients with CKD and ESKD. Psychosocial aspects of chronic kidney disease. Springer, Cham: Academic Press; 2021. p. 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817080-9.00009-9
Clavé S, Tsimaratos M, Boucekine M, Ranchin B, Salomon R, Dunand O, et al. Quality of life in adolescents with chronic kidney disease who initiate haemodialysis treatment. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):1–10.
Lopes M, Ferraro A, Koch VH. Health‐related quality of life of children and adolescents with CKD stages 4‐5 and their caregivers. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(7):1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00467-014-2769-8
Dotis J, Pavlaki A, Printza N, Stabouli S, Antoniou S, Gkogka C, et al. Quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;31(12):2309–2316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3457-7
El Shafei AM, Soliman Hegazy I, Fadel FI, Nagy EM. Assessment of quality of life among children with end‐stage renal disease: a cross‐sectional study. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:8565498. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8565498
Obiagwu PN, Sangweni B, Moonsamy G, Khumalo T, Levy C. Health‐related quality of life in children and adolescents with end‐stage renal disease receiving dialysis in Johannesburg. South Afr J Child Health. 2018;12(2):58–62. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCH.2018.V12I2.1457
Ku E, Kwok J. Complications of chronic kidney disease in adolescents. Adolescents with chronic kidney disease: from diagnosis to end‐stage disease. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97220-6_1
Harmer M, Wootton S, Gilbert R, Anderson C. Association of nutritional status and health‐related quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:1565–1573.
Marks PW. Evaluation of anemia in children and adults. Nonmalignant hematology: expert clinical review: questions and answers. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. p. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30352-9_1
Lazarus ER. Effectiveness of education and exercise on quality of life among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;7(3):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2018.07.003
McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(2):255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12509
Kuwabara A, Su S, Krauss J. Utilizing digital health technologies for patient education in lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14(2):137–142.
Alikari V, Tsironi M, Matziou V, Tzavella F, Stathoulis J, Babatsikou F, et al. The impact of education on knowledge, adherence and quality of life among patients on haemodialysis. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1989-y
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37(2):126–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003
Fadlalmola HA, Elkareem EMA. Impact of an educational program on knowledge and quality of life among hemodialysis patients in Khartoum state. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;12:100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100205
Guler MA, Aydın EO. Development and validation of a tool for evaluatingYouTube‐based medical videos. Ir J Med Sci. 2022;191(5):1985–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845‐021‐02864‐0.
Becherucci F, Roperto RM, Materassi M, Romagnani P. Chronic kidney disease in children. Clin Kidney J. 2016;9(4):583–591. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw047
Wong FK, Chow SK, Chan TM. Evaluation of a nurse‐led disease management programme for chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(3):268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.001
Chuasuwan A, Pooripussarakul S, Thakkinstian A, Ingsathit A, Pattanaprateep O. Comparisons of quality of life between patients underwent peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01449-2
Murray PD, Dobbels F, Lonsdale DC, Harden PN. Impact of end‐stage kidney disease on academic achievement and employment in young adults: a mixed methods study. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(4):505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.03.017
Maslakpak MH, Shams S. A comparison of face to face and video‐based self care education on quality of life of hemodialysis patients. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2015;3(3):234–243.
Baraz S, Zarea K, Dashtbozorgi B. Comparing the effect of two educational programs on the quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(8):19368. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.19368
Bakarman M, Felimban M, Atta MM, Butt NS. The effect of an educational program on quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis in western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(4):339–343. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.4.24049
Karimi Moonaghi H, Hasanzadeh F, Shamsoddini S, Emamimoghadam Z, Ebrahimzadeh S. A comparison of face to face and video‐based education on attitude related to diet and fluids: adherence in hemodialysis patients. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(5):360–364.
Baldwin DM. Viewing an educational video can improve phosphorus control in patients on hemodialysis: a pilot study. Nephrol Nurs J. 2013;40(5):437–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21701-0_64
Ren Q, Shi S, Yan C, Liu Y, Han W, Lin M, et al. Self‐management micro‐video health education program for hemodialysis patients. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(6):1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211033922
Kim ES. Development and effect of a rational‐emotive‐behaviour‐therapy‐based self‐management programme for early renal dialysis patients. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(21–22):4179–4191 https://doi.org/10.1111/JOCN.14608