The evaluation of video-assisted debriefing for improving performance in simulated medical student resuscitations.


Journal

AEM education and training
ISSN: 2472-5390
Titre abrégé: AEM Educ Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 17 07 2024
revised: 10 09 2024
accepted: 18 09 2024
pmc-release: 10 10 2025
medline: 14 10 2024
pubmed: 14 10 2024
entrez: 14 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Simulation-based training is commonly used in medical education. However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding best practices in debriefing. We aimed to identify novel solutions to this by adapting video-assisted debriefing (VAD) methodologies used in athletic training. We hypothesized that utilizing VAD would lead to improvements in performance during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS)-based simulations compared to traditional verbal debriefing (VD). The study was conducted at a single medical school. Participants were fourth-year medical students engaging in ACLS simulation-based training as part of their emergency medicine rotation. After completing an ACLS-based simulation, participants received either VD or VAD and then completed a second simulation scenario. Our primary outcome was ACLS performance, graded by blinded reviewers utilizing a previously developed modified checklist. Secondary outcomes included time from cardiac arrest to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first defibrillation. Measurements were made before and after the interventional debrief, referred to as pre- and postdebrief. A modified Likert-scale survey was used to subjectively assess the student's overall experience. Forty-six groups of 275 students were included in the study. Mean ACLS performance score for VD and VAD postdebrief were 85% and 82%, respectively ( VD and VAD both led to improvements in ACLS performance, time to initiation of CPR, and defibrillation among fourth-year medical students. Though postdebrief results were not statistically significantly different by comparison, overall VD led to greater improvement overall across all outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39398865
doi: 10.1002/aet2.11029
pii: AET211029
pmc: PMC11465287
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e11029

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

James VandenBerg (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Henry Moss (H)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.

Courtney Wechsler (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Chelsea Johnson (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Matthew McRae (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine Covenant Emergency Care Center Saginaw Michigan USA.

Shawn Sloan (S)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine Trinity Health Oakland Hospital Pontiac Michigan USA.

Trifun Dimitrijevski (T)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Sarkis Kouyoumjian (S)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Jeffrey A Kline (JA)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Anne Messman (A)

Department of Emergency Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA.

Classifications MeSH