Risk Factors for High Repair Tension During Rotator Cuff Repair.

multivariate analysis repair tension risk factor rotator cuff tear univariate analysis

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 16 02 2024
accepted: 07 03 2024
medline: 14 10 2024
pubmed: 14 10 2024
entrez: 14 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Excessively high repair tension, especially tension ≥10 N, can lead to unsuccessful rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative risk factors for high repair tension in rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized was that older age, longer symptom duration, nontraumatic (ie, degenerative) tear onset, progressive fatty degeneration, and larger tear size would be among the risk factors. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. This retrospective study involved 80 patients (80 shoulders) diagnosed with rotator cuff tears by magnetic resonance imaging between July 2018 and August 2020. Repair tension was measured intraoperatively using a digital tension meter. Risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) were evaluated. The Symptom duration of ≥4 months, nontraumatic tear onset, large/massive tears, mediolateral (ML) tear length of ≥20 mm, and anteroposterior (AP) tear length of ≥18 mm were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N ( The independent risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) during rotator cuff repair were nontraumatic tear onset, ML tear length of ≥20 mm, and AP tear length of ≥18 mm. Symptom duration of ≥4 months and large/massive tears were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N, although they were not considered independent risk factors. Prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the clinical value of the risk factors identified in this study.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Excessively high repair tension, especially tension ≥10 N, can lead to unsuccessful rotator cuff repair.
Purpose/Hypothesis UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative risk factors for high repair tension in rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized was that older age, longer symptom duration, nontraumatic (ie, degenerative) tear onset, progressive fatty degeneration, and larger tear size would be among the risk factors.
Study Design UNASSIGNED
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This retrospective study involved 80 patients (80 shoulders) diagnosed with rotator cuff tears by magnetic resonance imaging between July 2018 and August 2020. Repair tension was measured intraoperatively using a digital tension meter. Risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) were evaluated. The
Results UNASSIGNED
Symptom duration of ≥4 months, nontraumatic tear onset, large/massive tears, mediolateral (ML) tear length of ≥20 mm, and anteroposterior (AP) tear length of ≥18 mm were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The independent risk factors for high repair tension (≥10 N) during rotator cuff repair were nontraumatic tear onset, ML tear length of ≥20 mm, and AP tear length of ≥18 mm. Symptom duration of ≥4 months and large/massive tears were associated with high odds of repair tension ≥10 N, although they were not considered independent risk factors. Prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the clinical value of the risk factors identified in this study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39399768
doi: 10.1177/23259671241276445
pii: 10.1177_23259671241276445
pmc: PMC11468603
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23259671241276445

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Auteurs

Satoshi Miyake (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Terufumi Shibata (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Shunsuke Kobayashi (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Kei Matsunaga (K)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Naofumi Hata (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Yozo Shibata (Y)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukuoka University, Chukushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Teruaki Izaki (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukuoka University, Chukushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Takuaki Yamamoto (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Classifications MeSH