Insights of dietary electrolyte balance in broilers raised under natural heat stress conditions.

Electrolyte balance carcass yield gut histomorphometry haematology zootechnical performance

Journal

British poultry science
ISSN: 1466-1799
Titre abrégé: Br Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 15740290R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 10 2024
pubmed: 14 10 2024
entrez: 14 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

1. Dietary electrolyte balance (DEB) has been used to minimise problems in broiler chickens raised in warm climates. However, there is a need to determine the most appropriate DEB levels in these animals2. This study evaluated the influence of five DEB levels (110, 175, 240, 305 and 370 mEq/kg) on water intake (WI), zootechnical performance (feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio), tibiotarsus bone variables (fresh bone weight, dry bone weight, bone length, mineral matter, Seedor index and bone strength) and intestinal histomorphometry (villus height (VH) and width (VW), crypt height (CH) and width (CW), internal and external muscularis) on broilers in two developmental phases (1-21 and 22-42 d of age). Additionally, the haematological profile (blood count and serum biochemistry), carcass yield, cuts and abdominal fat were assessed.3. Applying 370 mEq/kg DEB increased WI, VW in the jejunum and ileum and number of haemocytes at 21 d, while WI and VW in the duodenum and ileum at 42 d. In contrast, 110 mEq/kg increased chlorine concentrations at 21 d and leukocyte and heterophil numbers at 42 d.4. In summary, the 370 mEq/kg level was the most appropriate for broiler homoeostasis raised under natural heat stress, as the best results were found on WI and VW variables. Therefore, this DEB level was recommended in broilers aged 21 or 42 d.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39399982
doi: 10.1080/00071668.2024.2379959
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-9

Auteurs

F A D S Moura (FADS)

Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, Brazil.

D R S E Silva (DRSE)

Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, Brazil.

R D S Araújo (RDS)

Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT, Pontal do Araguaia, Brazil.

G J B D C Ferreira (GJBDC)

Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Bom Jesus, Brazil.

P M Lopes (PM)

Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, Brazil.

S D C Silva (SDC)

Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Bom Jesus, Brazil.

R M Bezerra (RM)

Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Bom Jesus, Brazil.

F L D A Carvalho (FLDA)

Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Bom Jesus, Brazil.

J D F S Cardoso (JDFS)

Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, Brazil.

L P Machado (LP)

Campus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Realeza, Parana, Brazil.

L R B Dourado (LRB)

Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH