Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
Re-revision
Revision
TKA
UPIC
Unsuspected PJI
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2024
14 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
29
02
2024
accepted:
24
09
2024
medline:
15
10
2024
pubmed:
15
10
2024
entrez:
14
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reported to be 8.32% with largely varying findings in individual studies (5.92-62.07%) due to a heterogeneity in preoperative diagnostic work-up and diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). When diagnosed as unsuspected PJI, re-revision rate is reported to be as high as 18.45% compared to 2.94% in patients with UPIC classified as contamination (p = 0.0237). We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of revision TKA surgery to determine prevalence of UPIC, risk of developing a subsequent PJI and re-revision rate after 24 months compared to those without UPIC. All presumed aseptic total knee revision procedures from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Single stage femorotibial revisions of TKA with at least 3 intraoperative cultures and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included, whereas partial revisions or revisions from unicompartimental knee prosthesis to TKA were excluded. Demographic data were collected as well as initial reason for revision, preoperative aspiration results, micro-organism identified and postoperative antibiotics' administration. Primary outcome was survival rate after 24 months with differentiation based on UPIC interpretation: sterile, contamination, unsuspected PJI. Of 256 included cases, 75 (29.3%) were found to have at least 1 UPIC during revision surgery, 72% of whom a single UPIC was found. Thirty-four cases (13.28%) were interpreted as unsuspected PJI and therefore treated with antibiotics. In total, 13 of the 256 patients (5.08%) had to be re-revised during follow-up with 7 PJI (2.73%), none of them developing reinfection defined as PJI with the same microorganism. A statistically significant trend towards earlier failure in the unsuspected PJI group compared to the contaminant group was not observed. However, a higher incidence of re-revisions attributed to septic reasons was noted in the former group. Presence of UPIC in presumed aseptic revision TKA does not correlate with a lower survival rate, but a higher incidence of subsequent PJI was observed in cases interpreted as unsuspected PJI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39402142
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05601-1
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05601-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Orthopride (2020) Belgian Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registry. Annual Report
Cromheecke M, Missinne M, Van Onsem S, Victor J, Arnout N (2020) Efficacy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgery depends upon the indication for revision: a systematic review. Acta Orthop Belg 86(4):663–677 PMID: 33861915
pubmed: 33861915
van Rensch PJH, Hannink G, Heesterbeek PJC, Wymenga AB, van Hellemondt GG (2020) Long-term outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty is Associated with indication for revision. J Arthroplasty 35(6):1671–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.053 Epub 2020 Jan 24. PMID: 32070659
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.053
pubmed: 32070659
Arndt KB, Schrøder HM, Troelsen A, Andersen MR, Rasmussen LE, Lindberg-Larsen M (2024) Pain without loosening-revisions of knee arthroplasties in the Danish knee Arthroplasty Register. Dan Med J 71(2):A04230242. https://doi.org/10.61409/A04230242
doi: 10.61409/A04230242
pubmed: 38314731
Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Bragan Turner E, Liew S et al (2017) Variation in Prosthetic Joint Infection and treatment strategies during 4.5 years of follow-up after primary joint arthroplasty using administrative data of 41397 patients across Australian, European and United States hospitals. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1569-2
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1569-2
pubmed: 28532409
pmcid: 5441102
Wildeman P, Rolfson O, Söderquist B, Wretenberg P, Lindgren V (2021) What are the long- term outcomes of mortality, quality of life, and hip function after prosthetic joint infection of the hip? A 10- year follow- up from Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479(10):2203–2213
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001838
pubmed: 34061486
pmcid: 8445574
Kloos J, Vander Linden K, Vermote S, Berger P, Vandenneucker H (2022) Prevalence, interpretation, and management of unexpected positive cultures in revision TKA: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(12):3998–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06856-6
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06856-6
pubmed: 35031821
Jacobs AME, Bénard M, Meis JF, van Hellemondt G, Goosen JHM (2017) The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection: incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions. Bone Joint J 99–B(11):1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2016-0655.R2
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2016-0655.R2
pubmed: 29092987
Sangaletti R, Zanna L, Akkaya M et al (2023) Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with multiple arthroplasties. Bone Joint J 105–B(3):294–300. BJJ-2022-0800.R1 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2022-0800.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2022-0800.R1
pubmed: 36854322
Lee SH, Chang CH, Hu CC, Chang Y, Hsieh PH, Lin YC (2021) The risk factor and outcome of Metachronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: a retrospective analysis with a Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty 36(11):3734–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.019
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.019
pubmed: 34419315
Neufeld ME, Lanting BA, Shehata M, Naudie DDR, McCalden RW, Teeter MG, Vasarhelyi EM (2022) The prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in presumed aseptic revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37(11):2262–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.036
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.036
pubmed: 35598759
Peddada KV, Welcome BM, Parker MC (2023) Survivorship and etiologies of failure in single-stage revision arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint infection: a Meta-analysis. JAAOS: Global 7(5):e2200218. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00218
doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00218
Sigmund IK, Luger M, Windhager R, McNally MA (2022) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections: a comparison of infection definitions: EBJIS 2021, ICM 2018, and IDSA 2013. Bone Joint Res 11(9):608–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.119.BJR-2022-0078.R1
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.119.BJR-2022-0078.R1
pubmed: 36047011
pmcid: 9533249
Staphorst F, Jutte PC, Boerboom AL et al (2021) Should all hip and knee prosthetic joints be aspirated prior to revision surgery? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 14:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03791-6
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03791-6
Fuchs M, Kirchhoff F, Reichel H, Perka C, Faschingbauer M, Gwinner C (2021) Variation of synovial fluid leucocyte cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage in patients with aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2–8:566–572. 2021– 0109. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO2021-0109
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO2021-0109
Michels R, Last K, Becker SL, Papan C (2021) Update on coagulase-negative staphylococci-what the Clinician should know. Microorganisms 9(4):830. 9040830. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms.9040830
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms.9040830
pubmed: 33919781
pmcid: 8070739
Huotari K, Peltola M, Jämsen E (2015) The incidence of late prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop 86(3):321–325. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1035173
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1035173
pubmed: 25813645
pmcid: 4443453
Portillo ME, Salvadó M, Alier A et al (2013) Prosthesis failure within 2 years of implantation is highly predictive of infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3672–3678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3200-7
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3200-7
pubmed: 23904245
pmcid: 3792275
Weinstein EJ, Stephens-Shields AJ, Newcomb CW et al (2023) Incidence, Microbiological Studies, and factors Associated with prosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. JAMA Netw Open 6(10):e2340457. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40457
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40457
pubmed: 37906194
pmcid: 10618849