Hospital-based Costs to the National Health Service (UK) for Children and Adolescents Born with Cleft from Birth to 20 Years.

cleft lip and palate cleft palate health policies

Journal

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
ISSN: 1545-1569
Titre abrégé: Cleft Palate Craniofac J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9102566

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 10 2024
pubmed: 15 10 2024
entrez: 15 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The primary aim was to assess the cost (£) to the National Health Service (NHS) of hospital treatment for individuals born with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and cleft palate (CP), from birth to 20 years. The secondary aim was to assess the number of scheduled clinical outpatient and inpatient/outpatient surgical visits for this cohort. Retrospective micro-costing analysis. Patients treated within the South West of England Cleft Service (UK). Twenty-three case-notes of children born with cleft (5 BCLP; 10 UCLP; 8 CP) were identified from birth up to and including secondary alveolar bone graft (ABG), and a second group of 23 hospital case-notes (3 BCLP; 10 UCLP; 10 CP) were identified, post-ABG to 20 years. Mean costs from birth to ABG were £17,004 (BCLP), £11,620 (UCLP), and £6137 (CP), and post-ABG to 20 years were £9,463, £7,945, and £3,816, respectively. The largest costs were for staff. Repeat surgery had a significant impact on costs. The mean number of clinical outpatient visits for BCLP, UCLP, and CP were 140, 110 and 83 respectively and 8, 6 and 2 for inpatient/outpatient surgical visits, respectively. Costs for provision of cleft care by the NHS are significant. The greatest costs were incurred with care for patients with BCLP. Patients were expected to attend many appointments, with BCLP experiencing the most visits. Engagement with quality improvement programmes to minimise repeat surgery, and remote consultation for certain appointments, to reduce the patient burden are recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39403010
doi: 10.1177/10556656241289669
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10556656241289669

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Kyle Durman (K)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Saleem Hasanally (S)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Joanna Thorn (J)

Population Health Science, Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Anthony Ireland (A)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Peter Fowler (P)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Scott Deacon (S)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Jonathan Sandy (J)

Department of Oral Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Classifications MeSH