Relationship between dry eye disease and myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dry eye disease
Meta-analysis
Myopia
On-screen time
Systemaric review
Younger population
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Oct 2024
15 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
14
05
2024
revised:
07
09
2024
accepted:
27
09
2024
medline:
15
10
2024
pubmed:
15
10
2024
entrez:
15
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dry eye disease (DED) and myopia are common ocular disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the association between DED and myopia. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published between 1984 and 2022. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, and analysis was conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Of the 1,313 studies identified, 15 studies on DED and myopia were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall prevalence of subjective DED symptoms in the myopia population was 45.1 % (95 % confidence interval: 0.287-0.616). There was a significant association between DED and myopia. The myopia population had higher Ocular Surface Disease Index scores and shorter tear film breakup times than the non-myopia population. Additionally, the meta-regression analysis showed that spherical equivalent was significantly associated with the prevalence of DED symptoms in adults with myopia. Interventions to prevent DED are required in the myopia population. Enhancing patient awareness and self-management for DED, in addition to early screening and detection, is especially critical for younger populations who are at a higher risk of developing myopia.
Sections du résumé
Background/objectives
UNASSIGNED
Dry eye disease (DED) and myopia are common ocular disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the association between DED and myopia.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published between 1984 and 2022. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, and analysis was conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of the 1,313 studies identified, 15 studies on DED and myopia were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall prevalence of subjective DED symptoms in the myopia population was 45.1 % (95 % confidence interval: 0.287-0.616). There was a significant association between DED and myopia. The myopia population had higher Ocular Surface Disease Index scores and shorter tear film breakup times than the non-myopia population. Additionally, the meta-regression analysis showed that spherical equivalent was significantly associated with the prevalence of DED symptoms in adults with myopia.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Interventions to prevent DED are required in the myopia population. Enhancing patient awareness and self-management for DED, in addition to early screening and detection, is especially critical for younger populations who are at a higher risk of developing myopia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39403500
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38674
pii: S2405-8440(24)14705-6
pmc: PMC11471511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e38674Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: K.N. and A.M.I. received personal fees from InnoJin, Inc., outside the submitted work. S.N. received consulting fee from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK., Riverfield Inc., travel reimbursements and speaker fees from Alcon Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Canon Inc., JFC Sales Plan Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Machida Holdings Inc., MSD K.K., Novartis Pharma KK., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Wakamoto Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. not related to the submitted work. T.I. received non-financial support from Lion Corporation and Sony Network Communications Inc.; grants from Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc., Yuimedi Inc., ROHTO Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kandenko Co. Ltd., and Fukoku Co. Ltd.; and personal fees from Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., InnoJin Inc., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. not related to the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. The sponsors had no role in the design or execution of the study; data collection and management; the analysis and interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.